Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Ruger 77/357 (or 77/44) Peep Sights?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by HoosierQ, Aug 25, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. HoosierQ

    HoosierQ Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2008
    Messages:
    2,568
    Location:
    Central Indiana.
    Has anybody gone this route? N.E.C.G. has a "Ruger Receiver Sight" made for "most M-77, 77/22, and No.1 factory front sights". Kind of pricey but the 77/357 is not a cheap gun and I'd love to get this kind of sight on there.

    Is the factory front sight compatible? I'll change it if I have to but I'd rather not if possible.
     
  2. ECVMatt

    ECVMatt Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,427
    Location:
    Yonder
    I have also seen that NECG also makes a new ghost ring site for the Ruger as well. I am also interested if anyone has firsthand experience with either one of these sights.
     
  3. shadow9

    shadow9 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    300
    From what I understand, you won't know about the front sight until you get the peep on there.
    It would work - the NECG peep uses the exact same mounting as the stock Ruger scope rings - which IIRC are the same across all their bolt action rifles.
     
  4. HoosierQ

    HoosierQ Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2008
    Messages:
    2,568
    Location:
    Central Indiana.
    I read a review online and the reviewer, a big fan, did say he had to add a taller front sight. I think if I did so, I would add a fiber optic one perhaps...or at least a conventional one with a bigger bead...or a fatter post.
     
  5. HoosierQ

    HoosierQ Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2008
    Messages:
    2,568
    Location:
    Central Indiana.
    Yes, I'd expect so. Frankly I don't like whacking on those dovetailed sights with a punch. I swapped tech sights onto my 10/22. I had the barrel supported properly (so I thought) but I had to hit that so hard and so many times that the torque canted the barrel maybe 5 degrees. Fortunately, that's easy enough to fix on a 10/22 with that barrel nut and wedge set-up. I DO NOT want that to happen on the 77/357. Those universal sight pusher tools cost more than the sights and I wouldn't use if enough to pay for it...and nobody I know has one.
     
  6. Kernel

    Kernel Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2003
    Messages:
    2,005
    Location:
    77 Square Miles Surrounded by Reality (Madison), W
  7. sappyg

    sappyg Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2010
    Messages:
    1,439
    Location:
    South Carolina
    I have an NECG peep sight and have used it on both an RSI and a #1.

    Windage adjustments are a bit fiddley as you drift the sight with the base screw. It does work. It's just hard ( but not impossible) to get a fine tune on the system because you have to loosen the base mount to drift the sight.
    The factory front works for me at least on my rifles out to 100 yards in 308. & 45-70. For this sight I've always felt the factory front sight is too narrow for the peep. I think you can get smaller diameter peeps for it but I've never tried them.
    The peep itself is well made.
    You might consider calling NECG with a specific question regarding the front sight for the 77/ 357.
     
  8. HoosierQ

    HoosierQ Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2008
    Messages:
    2,568
    Location:
    Central Indiana.
  9. Deer_Freak

    Deer_Freak Member.

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2012
    Messages:
    662
    Location:
    North Carolina
    You will still need a way to press the dovetail out. I have a bearing press that I have R&R dovetails for friends with. It was tedious getting the gun clamped in a manner that wouldn't allow the gun to twist or damage the gun.
     
  10. Revoliver

    Revoliver Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2012
    Messages:
    304
    Location:
    USofA
  11. HoosierQ

    HoosierQ Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2008
    Messages:
    2,568
    Location:
    Central Indiana.
    I'll tell ya, nothing is easy. I just do not understand why in this day and age, more rifles are not offered with a rearmost mounted peep sight! Everybody has grown up shooting M1s, M1 carbines, M14s, minis, ARs, etc. The Ruger GSR has it. I think Savage has a scout rifle...and that's about it unless you're talking semi-automatic and even then, with 22s. Just seems like the sort of thing a lot of people would buy. Of course, probably that market is owned by the scope. I may look at a scope instead...I have rings. Heck, regular irons work well enough...it's my eyes that don't work so well!

    We'll see.
     
  12. Revoliver

    Revoliver Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2012
    Messages:
    304
    Location:
    USofA
    I agree that iron sights shoupd be a standard feature on all rifles. It seems it used to be, but recently has faded to afterthought at best.

    Though, to be fair, Ruger at least did just come out with their guide gun line of rifles that have iron sights standard.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page