Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Ruger LCR .357

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by Wade Wilson, Jun 24, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Wade Wilson

    Wade Wilson Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    Messages:
    50
    Location:
    Kennewick, WA
    How do you guys feel about the new LCR in the .357, think it will be a worthy competitor in the conceal carry competition?
     
  2. inthelineofire

    inthelineofire Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    78
    JMO, but I'm not a fan. There is a thread around here somewhere about the LCR and problems with flame cutting. I'd opt for a Smith 442 any day of the week.
     
  3. oasis618

    oasis618 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2009
    Messages:
    491
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    442 is nice but not an option if looking for a .357.
     
  4. 96projectz24

    96projectz24 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    54
    There are threads everywhere about every gun made that has had issues and for the most part aren't mass recalls. You sure there's never been an issue with a S&W 442. I just picked up an LCR, you're missing out on a great weapon by writing it off as garbage so fast.
     
  5. inthelineofire

    inthelineofire Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    78
    Certainly not writing it off as "garbage." I just would opt for a Smith with the same features. I understand the 442 is not available in .357. They are fine looking pieces, but from my personal experience, Smith and Wesson has higher quality. You get what you pay for. I do, however, LOVE my LCP.
     
  6. Old Fuff

    Old Fuff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    23,908
    Location:
    Arizona
    I am sure they will sell like hotcakes - but not to the Old Fuff. The LCR is an interesting platform, but an ultra-light .357 Magnum leaves me cold, regardless of who makes it. Most users won't be able to make fast but accurate follow-up shots and basketball sized patterns at bad breath distance is playing long odds.
     
  7. Wade Wilson

    Wade Wilson Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    Messages:
    50
    Location:
    Kennewick, WA
    Old Fuff,

    You would recommend sticking with the 38 spl, with a light weight snubby?
     
  8. oasis618

    oasis618 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2009
    Messages:
    491
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    Agreed. I love my little LCR CT but I'm not so sure I'd be interested in firing .357 magnums out of it. I've fired one of those S&W 12 oz. .357 jobby jobs and that isn't something I think I need to do again. ZING!!! :eek: ;)
     
  9. gordy

    gordy Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2010
    Messages:
    509
    Location:
    south central Minnesota
    S&W 640 is what you want.
     
  10. Old Fuff

    Old Fuff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    23,908
    Location:
    Arizona
    Yes I would, or at least I wouldn't go over .38 Special in this platform. In a larger, all-steel snubby I particularly like my 5-shot /.44 Special Taurus model 445. If one was determined to go to a small platform in .357 Magnum I would recommend Ruger's SP 101. Going still larger I like Smith & Wesson's K-frame models with at least a 3 inch barrel.

    As a side note: The Border Patrol's late shooting ace (and experienced gunfighter), Bill Jordan recommended the little .22 WRM as an ideal choice in the lightweight aluminum/steel J-frame revolvers that were available during his day. But he was a capable of putting his bullets exactly where he wanted to, even under extreme stress.
     
  11. hemiram

    hemiram Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    1,081
    Location:
    Toledo, Ohio
    I just don't even understand the appeal of the LCR at all. I shot the .38 one recently, and it just reinforced my original opinion. I would pick any number of small steel revolver over one, anytime.
     
  12. L-Frame

    L-Frame Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    479
    I am intrigued by the LCR in .357, but not to shoot .357's out of. I carry in an iwb anyway,not pocket, so the extra 5 ounces means nothing to me except in dampening recoil. I like the more weight and sturdier construction so I can shoot .38 +P's out of it easier and not have to worry about the gun coming apart.
     
  13. Lucky Derby

    Lucky Derby Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    Messages:
    2,145
    Location:
    Colorado Rockies
    The LCR is interesting but I have no use for .357 in any gun that small. IMHO the trade off between power and recoil/muzzle blast just isn't worth it in anything with less than 3" of barrel. I stick with .38's in the shorter barrels.
    Others may disagree, many do.
    That said the LCR appears to be a decent, although homely weapon. I would consider one in .38 if I didn't already have 2 revolvers that filled that role.
     
  14. TarDevil

    TarDevil Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2009
    Messages:
    1,490
    Location:
    NC Coast
    When the LCR hit the market in .38, I wrote Ruger to see if they might chamber the gun in .327 Fed... just seemed to make more sense to me than .357. They said they had no such plans for that gun. I've read elsewhere that the .327's 45,000 psi is too much for the LCR.

    LCR in .357 wouldn't interest me except for the reasons stated by L-Frame.
     
  15. Girodin

    Girodin Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Messages:
    5,570
    I have shot a fair number of rounds including a good many +p loads through the .38 spl LCR.

    As far as revolvers go I like the LCR and in my experience it compares favorably with Smith J frames as a carry piece. Shooting hotter .38 loads makes me think I wouldn't want to shoot too many hard hitting .357 mag rounds in a .357 LCR. I'll use my SP101 (a gun I have used to shoot hand loads I wouldn't dream of putting one of the light weights) for that purpose. Some shooters have found the recoil of the .38 spl LCR to be objectionable, particularly the +p loads. The .357 LCR with .38s might be a better choice for them because of the extra weight.
     
  16. snooperman

    snooperman Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    2,143
    A 17 oz 357 magnum LCR would be too much for me...

    as quick follow-up shots would be rather difficult . I have the Ruger SP101 and that would be as light as I would want to go. To me, the 38 special is hard to be for a carry gun.
     
  17. snooperman

    snooperman Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    2,143
    Lately , I have been carrying my Colt Cobra...

    which weighs about 16 oz and it is all I need in a light 38 special.
     
  18. The Lone Haranguer

    The Lone Haranguer Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    11,717
    Location:
    Johnson City, TN
    Too light for full powered .357 loads, IMO, although at 17 ounces it might be OK with a "medium velocity" load.
     
  19. rd2007

    rd2007 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2009
    Messages:
    317
    Location:
    San Antonio, TX
    Is this thing for sale yet?
     
  20. 22-rimfire

    22-rimfire Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    11,450
    Location:
    TN
    Not a gun I would be interested in. I would stick to the light 38spl revolvers. I'd go with a steel frame for a 357 mag.
     
  21. 93PT92

    93PT92 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2010
    Messages:
    29
    Totally hearsay, but I've heard mention they're full alloy frames, as opposed to poly over alloy for the 38s, or something like that. Worth googling. Threads I've read elsewhere had interest on the aspect of an LCR that's less polymer and more metal. Still mainly for 38 use.

    EDIT:

    Didn't notice your nick at first. What up Deadpool?
     
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2010
  22. rd2007

    rd2007 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2009
    Messages:
    317
    Location:
    San Antonio, TX
    I am actually interested in buying one of these. Does anyone know a place that has them for sale? Online would be ideal.
     
  23. NG VI

    NG VI Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2007
    Messages:
    4,884
    Location:
    Maine
    At 17 ounces it should be good to go with medium-light .357 loads, or hot .38 which wouldn't be very comfortable in a lighter gun. If it were the original 12-13 ounce LCR I'd shoot .357 out of it if I were getting paid to. But something like a 140 grain bullet going about a thousand feet per second, maybe a hair faster, that wouldn't be too outrageous and is a set of numbers I would feel very good about.
     
  24. antiquus

    antiquus Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    300
    Well, I can hit inside the 5 ring with my LCR at 50 yards, so anyone dissing LCR accuracy hasn't any experience with them.

    BUT, I am also sure that considering the pain that Buffalo Bore 38 Spl +P Heavy gives when shooting them out of a 13oz gun, I'd have no interest in a .357 version even at 17oz.
     
  25. Fat Boy

    Fat Boy Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2007
    Messages:
    698
    Location:
    Kansas Plains
    I cannot imagine shooting a 357 mag out of this platform, but then I can't imagine shooting a .357 mag out of any lightweight snubnose revolver-

    I appreciated Old Fuff's comment about Bill Jordan-I seem to remember Mr. Jordan once talking favorably about the .22 mag as a viable home defense round- some would consider that advice heretical today
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page