Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Ruger Mark III Hunter

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by glockman19, Nov 18, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. glockman19

    glockman19 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Messages:
    3,699
  2. Neophyte1

    Neophyte1 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    318
    Location:
    NC
    Ruger shooter

    glockman19: Sir; The hunter is an outstanding unit. Pricing is as always all over the place. Here in NC my shooting buddy has one set aside for $.350.00-$360.00
    It is the same unit. We chased all over NC and found a Dealer we hadn't done any business with; straight up pricing. It actually worked out he is the closest.Typically with Rugers; take the list and deduct approx. $125.00 and you'll be in a good starting ballpark.
     
  3. Frandy

    Frandy Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,354
    Location:
    NC
    I like the Ruger series and many will say that they prefer the I and II over the latest III. That aside...

    I have the Hunter. I bought it strictly because of it's looks, not to hunt. I like the fluted barrel. But, I would ask what you are going to do with it? Hunt? This is the Hunter and is set up for that - supposedly. If you are plinking or target shooting, there are others that some prefer, particularly the Target model with the grip that has a thumb rest.

    Ah, the Hi Viz sights? My middle-aged eyes hated them. Again, I'm plinking and shooting at paper. I ordered the appropriate set of standard sights from Ruger and swapped them out. I prefer the standard sights and a red dot much, much better.

    Can't comment on the price. I paid $400 plus 7% sales tax back in Aug. 2006.

    One man's humble opinion.

    Photo was taken before I changed the sights:
    [​IMG]
    Frandy
     
  4. stevereno1

    stevereno1 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2007
    Messages:
    801
    Location:
    GEORGIA, GO DAWGS!
    they are a little high in price. I want one though!
     
  5. KBintheSLC

    KBintheSLC Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    3,197
    Location:
    Stalingrad, USA
    I recently saw a nice Hunter SS BBL fluted with Fiber Optic front sight for about $395. That seemed a bit high but it was a sweet piece. The price on that site seems pretty high... maybe I am missing something?? I love my MKIII target, but I almost wish I had spent a bit more and bought a Hunter.
     
  6. P. Plainsman

    P. Plainsman Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,125
    Location:
    Red America
    The V-notch rear sight would really annoy me. When did US gun makers decide that inaccurate rear sight designs on target pistols were somehow cool?

    Definitely swap that out for a Patridge-type rear sight -- so add that to the budget for the pistol.

    Otherwise, kinda cool. I like its looks.
     
  7. GunNut

    GunNut Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,075
    Location:
    Washington State
    For that price I would consider picking up a used Ruger MK II and buying a nice Tactical Solutions upper for it.
     
  8. greener

    greener Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    353
    Location:
    Glen Allen, Virginia
    My first Ruger was a MKIII Hunter. Liked the feel of the grip, liked the fact that my aging eyes could see the front sight. I haven't been disappointed with the pistol.

    $459 seems to be an average price for these.

    Just to rekindle the MKIII/MKII dispute. I have a MKIII Hunter, MKIII 22/45 and KMKII678GC. Except for the location of the magazine release, I don't see any difference in function, reliability or accuracy. I think the MKIII loaded chamber indicator is a waste. My "LCI" is the bolt back and, as a minimum, eyes peering into the chamber. Does it bother me? No. Nor do I care if the pistol needs a magazine in the grip to fire or not. I bought the MKII because it was at the right price, in excellent shape and I knew from my experience with the MKIII's that it would do very nicely.

    If you like the Hunter, it will do very nicely. Nice thing about Rugers is they all seem to do very well.
     
  9. ewb45acp

    ewb45acp Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2003
    Messages:
    281
    Location:
    Northeast PA.
    I picked up a MKIII Hunter when they were first introduced. I've had a MKII for years and love it. When I handled the MKIII... "WOW" The feel, the balance... perfect. I couldn't buy it fast enough. At the range was a different story. I could never get a good sight picture with those fiber optic sights. My eyes just couldn't focus on them. I guess I could have swapped 'em out for more traditional sights, but I ended up trading it off for a Super Blackhawk.

    Anybody else have trouble with HI-VIS sights going all blurry on them?
     
  10. doc2rn

    doc2rn Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    Messages:
    3,495
    Location:
    SW Florida
    Yup me too, rented one today. I was gonna buy one till I saw it on the rental list now I am glad I waited. The new sights blurred real bad when aimed at a shoot n c. I will however get a MKII Target instead. I still like my MKI the best.
     
  11. zeke707

    zeke707 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2007
    Messages:
    59
    Locktite the front sight and have fun re-assembling after a cleaning! I bought one new. Great gun, excellent shooter with looks but... still worth buying.:)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page