Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Ruger MKII standard

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by 4D5, Mar 4, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 4D5

    4D5 Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2004
    Messages:
    264
    Location:
    Nevada, Carson Valley
    This little orphan has been languishing in the local pawn display case for some time, sharing space with the “big” relatives. I looked at it every time I was there but never checked it out. The hang tag was $299 so I never gave it too much thought, because I didn’t feel like negotiating for it as they probably would not come down much. I recently scored a 10” MKII there and checked it out while I was waiting paperwork.

    Well last week at lunch I decided to buy it provided the price was right. I bargained with the owner some but did not get to my price, the owner said best he could do is $250, but took my number for his son who I originally spoke with about the gun. The son called me and offered $210 plus tax & Brady :D (I was willing to go $220). I said I’ll be there this afternoon. So now it has a new home.

    Took it out yesterday and it shoots great.

    I got the box, papers and pistol. It appears to be LNIB and maybe fired only a few times.
    Standard model
    6 inch tapered bbl

    It looks like this:

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  2. Road Less Traveled

    Road Less Traveled Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2011
    Messages:
    20
  3. headoftheholler

    headoftheholler Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2012
    Messages:
    344
    I have the same in stainless. Very very accurate.
     
  4. MutinousDoug

    MutinousDoug Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2005
    Messages:
    848
    Location:
    Colorado
    A VERY similar gun carried me to a 288/300 Bullseye score back when I could see iron sights well and shot Conventional Pistol in a league some years back (1980's).
    I think you will enjoy it.
     
  5. gunlaw

    gunlaw Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    339
    I would have been all over that for $250. You got a great deal on a great pistol. Enjoy it!!
     
    Last edited: Mar 4, 2012
  6. PO2Hammer

    PO2Hammer Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    3,221
    Location:
    MINNESOTA
    Yup, I would have jumped at $250. $210 is fantastic.
    Very nice. I have the 4-5/8" WBR/NRA commemorative, accurate and runs like a top.
     
  7. SASS#23149

    SASS#23149 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    1,839
    Location:
    Washougal,Wa
    SUPER PRICE. they are very much the 'in demand Mark series' gun.
     
  8. smallbore

    smallbore Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2009
    Messages:
    457
    Location:
    I live in the White Mountains area of New Hampshir
    Nice. Very nice.
     
  9. Pietro Beretta

    Pietro Beretta Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2005
    Messages:
    618
    Location:
    WA
    Being a Mark II, does it make it more desirable than an MKIII ?
     
  10. Zeke/PA

    Zeke/PA Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Messages:
    2,295
    Location:
    Southeastern Pa.
    Congrats on a great buy.
    I just love the Ruger "MK" series .22 Autos.
    My own is a MK 1 Bull Barrel that I bought eons ago, like in 1970.
    Price on the box reads $54.00.
    I shoot about 1000 rounds/ year through it and I had to replace the firing pin 25 or so years ago.
     
  11. Remllez

    Remllez Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2011
    Messages:
    980
    Great price!!....Super pistol....some guys have all the luck.
     
  12. Carl N. Brown

    Carl N. Brown Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Messages:
    7,816
    Location:
    Kingsport Tennessee
    Depends on how you feel about new Mark III features like loaded chamber indicator, the magazine safety, and the magazine release in the Colt/Luger position (rather than heel of butt on the Mark II).

    I own a Mark II, blue, 6 inch tapered barrel, so I am Prejudiced. Difference between the two really depends on which one you are most familiar with.
     
  13. PapaG

    PapaG Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,994
    Location:
    Il
    I'll take MKIIs over IIIs any day. IIIs are much more user unfriendly to disassemble (at least for our customers) and our smith says the triggers are much more difficult to tune..
    I picked up a like new MKI the other day (a real MKI, the target model--the MK designation started with the target gun..the others were called "standard automatic".) It shoots great, just like its little brother, the MKII than hangs beside it in the safe. ($250, but I had to find a magazine for it)
     
  14. Greg528iT

    Greg528iT Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,220
    Nice.

    I like my Mark iii a LOT. When I press the mag release button instead of the heal release, I like that a lot too. I've heard complaints about the chamber loaded lever on the Mark iii, but to date (knock) mine has been a non issue.
     
  15. PO2Hammer

    PO2Hammer Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    3,221
    Location:
    MINNESOTA
    To me it does. I was not impressed at all with my Mark III hunter. The barrel leaded badly, it had sharp edges and the LCI is very unattractive (IMO) and it just didn't shoot as well as my Mark II.

    The heel release on the Mark II doesn't bother me, although sometimes after shooting it I start reaching for heel releases on other guns that aren't there.
     
  16. tuj

    tuj Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2011
    Messages:
    1,976
    Location:
    Houston
    I have shot both the MKII and MKIII in bullseye competition. Both guns need a VQ extractor to be more reliable (the VQ part has a much sharper edge on it, prevents stove-pipes). The MKII for me needed an extended mag release. The mag safety on the MKIII is crap but it is easily removed using one of Sam Lam's bushings from Rimfire Central or a Clark or VQ MKII bushing.

    The LCI some people find annoying, some people find it gets dirty and causes jams. I agree it could have been implemented better, but there is an LCI filler piece sold on RFC if you don't like it. I personally like it because it helps me know quickly if the pistol has picked up the next round in the mag or not without having to manipulate the bolt to check. Which isn't to say I rely on the LCI to tell me the gun is clear, I would NEVER do that. But in competition the LCI can tell you that you are loaded. I also find the LCI useful with new shooters, but always remind them that the gun is always loaded until you visually and physically inspect the chamber.

    I don't like the stock grips on either gun, so I put some Hogues on the MKII and VQ Volthane on the MKIII.

    As for accuracy, they are the same. As far as the triggers, I don't see any difference between a MKII and a MKIII with the mag. disconnect safety removed; the mechanisms are virtually identical. Plus VQ makes a great drop-in trigger kit for the gun that is easily installed yourself.

    Overall the MK-series guns are great.
     
  17. glove

    glove Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    539
    Location:
    Richfield, Ohio
    Nice find.:) And also a great price.
     
  18. Pilot

    Pilot Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    6,605
    Location:
    USA
    Nice! I have four MK II's, probably will never get a MK III, although never is a long time. :)
     
  19. bannockburn

    bannockburn Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    13,170
    Wow great buy! I would have paid $250 for it without thinking twice about it.
     
  20. Stevie-Ray

    Stevie-Ray Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,059
    Location:
    Mitchi-gun, the Sunrise Side
    I still love mine too. 'Course mine was only 92 bucks new all those years ago.
    [​IMG]

    In fact my NIB KMK-512 many years later was only $259. Times change.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page