So trying to figure out an unproductive way to blow the tax return and looking at .308 "battle" rifles to add to my collection. I hear/read good things both about the Ruger SR-762, and the Sig 716 and I'm trying to decide if the extra $300 (give or take) the Sig is going for is genuinely worth it or if it's apples and oranges. Anyone want to chime in on the idea? Obviously wouldn't mind saving a few bucks unless the Ruger is actually inferior. I've read the Sig generally requires a break-in period to reliably feed, while the Ruger seems to do fine out of the box. Then there's also the idea I'd probably change the butt stock on the Ruger which would add a little to the price off the bat, any other accessory would likely apply to either anyway. Thoughts? Maybe shared experiences with either?