Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Rules of Engagement

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by FourDeuce, Nov 25, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. FourDeuce

    FourDeuce Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Messages:
    4
    Location:
    North Arkansas
    "If the point was just to stop an attack, why not carry mace?"

    Did anyone else see that little demonstration they did in Survival Guide(I think) years ago? They had a guy with a handgun facing off against someone else with some mace. They were facing about 45° away from each other. The person with the mace was just trying to defend himself. The person with the pistol was the "attacker" and was supposed to engage a target after being sprayed with the mace. The person with the mace went first. The mace holder sprayed the guy with the mace, and then the guy with the pistol pulled out his pistol, shot the target several times, then had to stop shooting because he couldn't see good enough to shoot any more. I think that demonstrates how good a defense mace is. ;)
    Remember, a self-defense shooting is to make the person stop doing something(like attacking YOU). It may take killing them to make them stop, but the short-term objective is to make them stop what they're doing. You can worry later about other things, like facing them(or their survivors) in court.
     
  2. clubsoda22

    clubsoda22 member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2003
    Messages:
    1,718
    Location:
    SE PA
    I carry mace because it's all i can carry for now, but when faced with an opponent with a gun, there's no rule that says, "you get to go first, there's no wind and your attacker is at most 10 ft away"

    Mace works quite well for unarmed thugs, however.
     
  3. c_yeager

    c_yeager Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2003
    Messages:
    5,479
    Location:
    Seattle
    I agree with clubsoda. There is one HUGE problem with that scenario. If the guy with the gun is the "attacker" wouldnt his weapon be displayed first? All the demonstration proved is the if someone ATTACKS you with mace you wont be able to shoot them too easily.
     
  4. BluesBear

    BluesBear member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2003
    Messages:
    7,672
    Location:
    The Great Pacific NorthWet
    I know a doorman at a bar in bowntown Seattle who will for a modest amount of $$$ spray OC in his mouth like it was Binaca.
    :what:

    Yeah he sheds 3 or 4 tears but that's about it.

    Or course I saw a drunk smash a ½full Budweiser Longneck over his head once and he just smiled and said "That was refreshing".
     
  5. Checkman

    Checkman member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,884
    Location:
    Idaho
    Mace dosen't effect everybody the same way. It also may not be that effective against individuals who are extremely intoxicated or are using drugs. It also may not work on mental subjects, but having said all that it is fairly effective on most of the population. In order to carry it I had to be sprayed with it. That was almost four years ago and I never want to go through that again.
     
  6. goalie

    goalie Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2003
    Messages:
    1,168
    Location:
    Minnetonka, Minnesota
    We had a little guy in boot camp that sat in the gas chamber and laughed at the DIs. He said that after a few minutes it "tickled" his nose a little.
     
  7. FPrice

    FPrice Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,380
    Location:
    People's Commonwealth of Massachusetts
    Did anyone else see that little demonstration they did in Survival Guide(I think) yea

    The way you (they) present this scenario is flawed. As many people have already pointed out, the man with the pistol had no motivation other than to participate in a test and perform a mechanical function. Even at that he was able to draw his pistol and hit the target.

    Now take an attacker who is motivated by anger or adrenaline, high on booze or drugs and they may very well be resistant to the effects of a spray long enough to do you real harm.

    Just as we need to have the ability to arm ourselves with appropriate items to defend ourselves, we need to be armed with facts to resist such artificial demonstrations of why "we do not need guns".

    Thanks for helping to educate our audience.
     
  8. BluesBear

    BluesBear member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2003
    Messages:
    7,672
    Location:
    The Great Pacific NorthWet
    To triumph over the lion one must be smarter than the lion.

    But

    To triumph over evil one must be stronger than the evil.



    Feel free to quote me.
     
  9. 45+

    45+ Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2003
    Messages:
    184
    Location:
    The Lone Star State
    I remember standing at attention in the "(Tear) Gas Chamber" shouting general orders at the top of our lungs after removing our masks just to prove to us that we could continue to function. I do not know the strength of the tear gas, and we certainly coughed and choked, but we stayed in there shouting those orders until they let us out, and then we went on with our "activities".

    Like ClubSoda, if that is all I could legally carry, I would consider it. It's better than nothing. But what about situations like the bg following you home being discussed in another thread? What if he is 10' away as Clubsoda mentioned? What if there are several of them?

    The subject of FTS rightly gets a lot of discussion when we are discussing firearms. How much higher is the probability of FTS with OC? What do you do then, spray him again?

    IMO OC is an appropriate weapon for the U.S. Postman. It might work on dog and since CCW is totally ruled out, it could be used against an attacker in a pinch. But that is what I said before. It is better than nothing.

    Safe packin'...
     
  10. FourDeuce

    FourDeuce Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Messages:
    4
    Location:
    North Arkansas
    Lessons learned

    "The way you (they) present this scenario is flawed. As many people have already pointed out, the man with the pistol had no motivation other than to participate in a test and perform a mechanical function. Even at that he was able to draw his pistol and hit the target."

    I'm not absolutely positive, but it seems to me the object lesson they were trying to demonstrate with that test was that mace might not be enough in a defensive situation.

    "Now take an attacker who is motivated by anger or adrenaline, high on booze or drugs and they may very well be resistant to the effects of a spray long enough to do you real harm.
    Just as we need to have the ability to arm ourselves with appropriate items to defend ourselves, we need to be armed with facts to resist such artificial demonstrations of why "we do not need guns".""

    I took that as more of a demonstration of "why we DO need guns".
     
  11. Checkman

    Checkman member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,884
    Location:
    Idaho
    Just a technical point. OC and CS are not the same. Having experienced both CS is much worse. But I wasn't disagreeing with anybody here regarding the effectiveness of Pepper Spray. Cops carry a can of pepper spray as just one of many tools on his or her belt. Not the only tool.
     
  12. FPrice

    FPrice Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,380
    Location:
    People's Commonwealth of Massachusetts
    "I took that as more of a demonstration of "why we DO need guns"."

    I wasn't sure what the original intent was, but I felt that it proved what you said. And I felt that the way it proved it would provide verbal ammunition for someone who wanted to limit us to sprays only.

    Perhaps I was not as clear as I should have been.
     
  13. foghornl

    foghornl Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    7,403
    There is a certain percentage of the population that is essentially immune to Mace, pepper sparay, etc.

    I can eat hot & spicy, but there is a limit. I have a distant cousin that will run screaming out of the room when someone opens one of those little pouches of 'taco bell hot sauce'. My nephew, a Marine Lance Corporal, said the tear gas chamber test hardly bothered him, while a couple of guys were on the floor.

    Each of us has a different sensitivity level to Mace, OC, etc.
     
  14. Dave R

    Dave R Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    3,628
    Location:
    Idaho
    The best example of the relative effectiveness of OC spray vs. handgun may be Tamara's 1st person thread.

    Short version is, she sprayed an attacker. REALLY sprayed him. Then withdrew. He kept coming. She drew her pistol. He left.
     
  15. Gordon Fink

    Gordon Fink Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,322
    Location:
    California
    In my experience, cops don’t have a whole lot of faith in sprays. I don’t doubt them.

    Personally, I think non-lethal “weapons†are a potentially dangerous waste of time in most self-defense situations.

    ~G. Fink
     
  16. Marko Kloos

    Marko Kloos Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    2,587
    Location:
    Enfield, NH
    I've known plenty of people who are unaffected by mace, tear gas, or OC.

    I have yet to meet anyone who is bulletproof.

    Ergo, I carry a handgun for self-defense, and leave the hot stuff for cooking.
     
  17. DadOfThree

    DadOfThree Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    278
    Location:
    Greencastle, IN
    I'm one of those guys. I went through the gas chamber and it really wasn't that bad. My eyes watered a little and that was it. When we were given the okay to go everybody else charged the door. I just stood back and watched the shoving match. :) I have never been sprayed with pepper gas but I don't have any desire to try it.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page