Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

S&W 29 or Ruger Redhawk?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by lindcase, Oct 28, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. lindcase

    lindcase Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2004
    Messages:
    32
    I have several Rugers and several S&W's. I now want to purchase a 44 magnum. Price and brand loyalty aside which would you buy?
     
  2. tc300mag1

    tc300mag1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,913
    Location:
    Wayne, Mi
    i prefer the super redhawk or a redhawk over the model 29 had a model 29 didnt like it .. So my vote is for a ruger
     
  3. g_gunter

    g_gunter Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2003
    Messages:
    166
    Location:
    Mississippi
    If you plan on shooting loads it was originally intended to shoot....240/250 gr. @ 1200-1400 fps then I say go with the Smith 29. In my opinion you can't beat the Smith. If, on the other hand, you are wanting to shoot the real heavy .44 mag loads (300 gr. plus) then you definitely need to go with the Ruger. I've shot the 300 gr. Hornady XTP through a Redhawk and it loved it.

    g_gunter
     
  4. unspellable

    unspellable Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,744
    Location:
    Iowa
    44 choice

    For light duty the S&W.

    For serious shooting, the Dan Wesson.

    I sold my Ruger Redhawk.
     
  5. 41mag

    41mag Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2003
    Messages:
    1,021
    Location:
    western mi
    This post looks familiar?:D

    I still vote for either.:)

    Although,if $$ is an issue,a new Redhawk can be had for $450-500.A new Smith is a good $100-200 more.:(
     
  6. stans

    stans Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    2,426
    Location:
    central Virginia
    S&W for loads using bullets of no more than 250 grains at factory velocity. For heavier loads, the Ruger or Dan Wesson.
     
  7. Rich K

    Rich K Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2004
    Messages:
    552
    Location:
    SE Michigan
    I shoot my S&W Mod 29 withstandard factory 240 gr loads,and enjoy it,even took a whitetail with it last season.But my main outside handgun is a Redhawk in 44 mag,stainless.After a trip to Mag-Na-Port,for a trigger job,It is a very good gun that will handle anything I care to drop in the cylinder,and I can keep my Mod 29 for special social occasions.:)
     
  8. MrPhil

    MrPhil Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Messages:
    111
    Location:
    Oregon
    My own preference is for the Smith. Something about the Ruger doesn't agree with my hand. The gun seems to rotate in my hands and I find myself regripping between shots.
     
  9. stans

    stans Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    2,426
    Location:
    central Virginia
    The factory Redhawk stocks are pretty skinny, the Super Redhawk uses the same stocks and attaching arrangement as the GP-100 and I have found these to be as close to perfect as any revolver I have ever handled. The first 44 that I purchased was a Super Redhawk, for the price it was unbeatable and the integral scope mount and great stocks made it ideal. I later purchased a used S&W 29-3 for shooting lighter loads.
     
  10. lindcase

    lindcase Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2004
    Messages:
    32
    Thanks for all the replies. For those who inquired, I posted this same question on the following boards: Ruger forum, S&W forum, The High Road and Pistolsmith. The replies were mostly the same, S&W for carry/duty use with factory ammo (better trigger). Or the Redhawk for hot ammo at the range or hunting large game. I did find it interesting that no one beat up on either gun. Every one seemed to put loyalty aside. A few suggested a Dan Wesson. Unfortunately I live in the peoples republik of Massachusetts and the head of the Gestapo, uh, I mean Attorney Generals office, refuses to allow me to buy a Dan Wesson revolver, he tells me it’s not safe! He won’t prosecute Catholic Bishops or Cardinals for raping little boys but I can’t buy a gun! Sorry for the editorial. I will only be using this gun for “big yucks†at the range. So I guess the Redhawk will be my next revolver. I do carry a S&W 4" 66 and just love it. Maybe I will have a trigger job done if I find it too rough.
     
  11. stans

    stans Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    2,426
    Location:
    central Virginia
    Yeah, right, DW revolvers are unsafe. We always hear those stories about DW revolvers just firing by themselves, repeatedly, even after all the ammo in the gun has been fired.:rolleyes:
     
  12. TODD3465

    TODD3465 Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2003
    Messages:
    323
    DW are pretty good though the company itself has had some ups and downs.


    Currently of the ones asked about I'd go Ruger I've had too many timing and QC issues with S&W "N" frames myself, though that was back in thier gun of the month days of the late 80's.
     
  13. Marshall

    Marshall Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    5,569
    Location:
    Oklahoma, Green Country
    Either one with the above mentioned guidlines. Both are nice guns!
     
  14. Magnum88C

    Magnum88C Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    351
    Both are great.

    I think unless you're going to run a steady diet of 300-gr barn-burners, the N-frame Smiths are fine. I haven't had a lick of trouble out of the 6" 629 DX or the 4" 629. I've shot 300-grainers out of them, but not a lot.

    If you plan on shooting top-tier loads a lot, definitely go with the Ruger.
     
  15. Jubal Early

    Jubal Early Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2003
    Messages:
    5
    Location:
    Round Rock, Tx
    I have owned both. I agree that either is fine for normal loads, and if you are going for really heavy loads choose the Ruger. I suggest you see if you can shoot each and see which feels best in your hand. I always had a slight preference for Ruger based on that test.
     
  16. wanderinwalker

    wanderinwalker Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    1,970
    Location:
    SW NH
    Not to thread-jack, but I am trying to see if I have figured this out. (I'm looking between finding a .44 Mountain Gun or a 5.5" Redhawk as my 21st birthday present to self.)

    Smith and Wesson: Good for factory 240/250gr loads and lighter. Unwise to fire too many heavy (250?+) magnums through. (Although I suspect discomfort of shooting said loads in a Mountain Gun would help mitigate the issue.)

    Ruger Redhawk: Go ahead, try to wear it out with heavy loads, we dare you. Not quite as svelte as a Smith or refined, but overall is a much tougher piece of steel.

    Am I getting this? And I'm looking for a pistol mostly for packing in the woods (never know what you might meet) and plinking at targets of opportunity, plus the possibility of being turned against 4-legged game (whitetails #1).

    Sorry to hijack all, please go easy on me...
     
  17. TK73

    TK73 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    177
    Location:
    Far away
    If you can afford it, get both. It'll help the industry and you'll have two great .44 Mag. revolvers. Don't forget to add a Ruger Super Blackhawk and/or Ruger NM Bisley later. :cool:
     
  18. mountainclmbr

    mountainclmbr Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2003
    Messages:
    1,289
    Location:
    On top of a mountain in Colorado
    I have had a Dan Wesson for about 22 years. Never had a problem.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page