Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

S&W 586 vs Python

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by schmeky, Apr 21, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. schmeky

    schmeky Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2006
    Messages:
    2,190
    Location:
    West Monroe, Louisiana
    I have a nickle plated S&W 586, no dash I bought in 1984. I recently bought a NIB Colt Python. Naturally a quasi-comparison is inevitable.

    My 586 is very slick from many years of shooting, the Python is velevety smooth right out of the box.

    After lusting after a Python for many many years, I was surprised to find the 586 gives up little if anything to the Colt in smoothness, trigger pull, lock-up, and general feel (subjective of course). My 586 has held up extremely well after firing thousands and thousands of rounds, in fact, everything works, fits, and feels like jeweled perfection.

    I do like this Python, but the old forged steel 586's are truly a milestone in S&W .357's.
     
  2. jt1

    jt1 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2007
    Messages:
    1,008
    Location:
    WA State
    schmeky - Sounds like you can make both your hands happy at the same time.
     
  3. GUNKWAZY

    GUNKWAZY Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2004
    Messages:
    976
    Location:
    AZ
    Sounds like I'll have to trade you my 586 for that crappy Python straight up.
    My loss would be your gain.
    I'm willing to make that sacrifice to make you happy ...:neener:

    Jeff (GUNKWAZY)
     
  4. SaxonPig

    SaxonPig Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    4,787
    I see quite a few 586/686 owners comparing their guns to the Python but frankly I don't get it. The two are not in the same league and were never meant to be compared.

    The 5/686 is a working gun. It's not fancy or refined or deluxe.

    The Python is a top of the line model with lots of hand fitting and deluxe finish and features. To me it's like comparing a Lincoln and an F150. Both are good at what they do, but the Lincoln does its thing with more comfort and style.

    Maybe it's because S&W tried to copy the appearance of the Python with a ribbed barrel that some shooters think they are similar?
     
  5. schmeky

    schmeky Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2006
    Messages:
    2,190
    Location:
    West Monroe, Louisiana
    SaxonPig,

    I respectfully disagree with your analogy. The 586 action can be made as slick as the Pythons for a modest cost. The nickel plating on my particular 586 is beautiful. I have seen some blued 586's that while not as mirror blue finished as the Python, were still beautifully polished.

    I believe the Pythons edge is in the manner the barrel bore is made. Pythons have a slight decreasing diameter as the crown is approached. This ensures positive engraving of the rifling by the bullet.

    Don't get me wrong, the Python is a work of art, but the 586/686 is an outstanding revolver in its own right.
     
  6. L-Frame

    L-Frame Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    479
    I'm not python bashing here, but with the Python's relatively weak lockwork and stacking trigger, I think 686's are simply better guns for what guns are meant to do, shoot. Pythons are beautiful guns. I think they are the nicest looking handguns ever made. But I would never pay those prices for that, or for an additional 1/2 inch of accuracy at 25 yards.
     
  7. Sundles

    Sundles Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Messages:
    236
    L-Frame and Schmecky are correct.

    The Python has weak lock work and if you shoot much more than a few thousand rounds of full power 357 out of them, you'll have to have them rebuilt--been there, seen that.

    Also, Pythons are all very slow shooters. While they are normally quite accurate and have smooth actions, they are notoriously slow. You wouldnt know this unless you have been chrongraphing them for a long time. Normally, a four inch Smith and Wesson, will shoot the same ammo about 100 fps faster than a SIX INCH Python.

    Some L frame Smiths are every bit as accurate as a Python.
     
  8. YodaVader

    YodaVader Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    940
    Location:
    Indiana
    I had a Python in the late 80's , a used 1970s vintage - to me it was the most beautiful revolver I had ever owned and seemed more like a piece of artwork compared to the Smith 686 and Ruger GP100 I owned at the time.

    But when it came to shooting I could not shoot that revolver anywhere near as well as I could the Smith or Ruger? I mean the trigger was great , no problem with the sights , just did not shoot for me. :confused:

    I ended up trading it off , should have not done so since I could have sold it for so much today!
     
  9. Sunray

    Sunray Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2003
    Messages:
    10,481
    Location:
    London, Ont.
    "...is velevety smooth right out of the box..." That's why they're a thousand bucks and a 586 runs about half that. The trigger job is done in the factory. All other firearms require a trigger job.
     
    Last edited: Apr 22, 2007
  10. schmeky

    schmeky Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2006
    Messages:
    2,190
    Location:
    West Monroe, Louisiana
    I have handled some S&W K and N frames that had a professionally slicked action that was even better than the Python's.

    L-Frame,

    My 586 has a DA pull that I describe as "cam" like. I can pull the trigger in the DA mode and about 2/3's through the pull actually gets lighter. I can easily modulate the trigger in this manner allowing me to shoot my 586 very accurately in a slow controlled DA mode.

    I have handled nearly every revolver brand and I always compare my 586's DA pull and I have not found anything that equals it, let alone is better. Even the Python.
     
  11. glockman19

    glockman19 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Messages:
    3,699
    Both great guns. I have a 686 and would like a 586 to go with it. The colt python is a classic. Not even sure I can get it in CA as I think it's off the DOJ list, I may be wrong.
     
  12. KINGMAX

    KINGMAX Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2006
    Messages:
    1,166
    Location:
    Central North Carolina
    I have a 686

    I would say that I prefer my 686 over a Colt Python. It may be just that the 686 is one of my favorite shooters. I do not, nor have I ever owned a Colt Python. I have shot one several times. I prefer my 686 over alot of my own pistols, one of by favorite for sure.
     
  13. AH-1

    AH-1 Member In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    477
    Location:
    TEXAS
    got a 586, 681, python, and a few rugers sooo

    the python is the best for accuracy.
    mine has only had 148 gr wc loads at will eat the center out of the bull at 25 meters any day of the week.
    down side a steady diet of heavy 357 mag loads and your going to shoot it loose.they just can't take abuse. a sweet smooth action but it comes at a price.

    next come the smiths.I like them but stock to stock they don't come close to a python.you can spend some money and "maybe" get them close but thats a maybe.
    I have a 681 that has been tune by one of the best great gun.I carry it while hunting.I trust it enough for carry and we have mountain lions here.
    down side yup a steady diet of heavy 357 mag loads and over time you will shoot it loose.much stronger action than the python.

    next the rugers.I have a security six and a new sp101.they don't come close to the smith..or the python.that said they are built like a tank and have shot some heavy loads out of the ruger ss and not one problem.
    again some money spent on a tune by a good gun smith and the action can be nice but not as good a smith 586/686/681.
    ever hear of some shooting loose a ruger:) I haven't.

    just my .02 as a 357 nut:) now flame beat me up...its ok.
    pete
     
  14. sansone

    sansone Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2007
    Messages:
    2,173
    Location:
    north florida USA
    I owned & loved the 686, but would have traded it (and giggled) to have a python
     
  15. Jackal

    Jackal Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    4,371
    Location:
    Northwest Washington
    Well, I personally feel that overall, the winner is a toss-up. The Python, while more finely finished has little actual edge over the 586. My 586, that I purchased used, is an excellent shooter that just happens to have the best trigger, single or double action that I have ever felt. For the money, the 586 beats the Python hands down. What it all comes down to is the name. I compare these two handguns with a car analogy. I am a guy who owns a Ford and I don't feel like spending the extra $50,000 just to say that I own a Benz.
     
  16. CSA 357

    CSA 357 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,400
    Location:
    North Alabama
    give me the l frame smith, had a python and was tickeled when i got rid of it. the colt is just not as strong as the smith, dont try to tell me it is , even the k frame smith is stronger than the python , but they are a very sweet looking revolver but over priced for my needs , im not trying to step on any ones toes csa
     
  17. schmeky

    schmeky Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2006
    Messages:
    2,190
    Location:
    West Monroe, Louisiana
    I have owned many .357's in SA and DA configuration. Currently have a new S&W 66, the 6" blued Python, my 6" 586, and have owned a couple of Ruger Security Six's (great pistols by the way) in the past, also a Dan Wesson (broke the day after I bought it).

    I think the L frame is the ideal size, soaks up recoil, holds up well after thousands of rounds, and has a classic look to it.

    I think the Python is probably the best looking revolver ever made and has a certain "aire" about it. The 586 is for go, the Python is for show.
     
  18. L-Frame

    L-Frame Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    479
    I think that alot of people mistake frame strength with lockwork strength when it comes to a python. The python frame is actually very strong. In fact, if I remember right it was built on Colt's .41 mag. frame. Shooting alot of magnums won't hurt the frame or cause the gun to fall apart, but the lockwork will fall out of time quicker than either a smith or ruger. The lockwork is more delicate, not the frame.
     
  19. JohnBT

    JohnBT Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    13,232
    Location:
    Richmond, Virginia
  20. L-Frame

    L-Frame Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    479
    Grant talks about parts in the python having a normal replacement interval, and requiring action adjustments so internal part won't start beating themselves up requiring expensive repairs. I'd call that delicate.
     
  21. AH-1

    AH-1 Member In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    477
    Location:
    TEXAS
    tough as nails
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    but this is my fav.
    [​IMG]
     
  22. 10-Ring

    10-Ring Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,037
    Location:
    California
    I too lusted for a Python for a long time & finally got one a few months ago. Today, I am happy w/ my S&W mod 19 and my circa 1969 Python. I am really glad I have both and appreciate both for diff't reasons.
     
  23. glassman

    glassman Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    730
    Location:
    Springfield, Pennsylvania
    NIB??

    Colt quit making the Python in the mid 90's (1996 I think). You could still get an elite model from the custom shop till 2003. I can't believe that the python in question here has been on the shelf without having at least one previous owner. Grant cunningham's analogy IMHO is spot on. :scrutiny:
     
  24. JohnBT

    JohnBT Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    13,232
    Location:
    Richmond, Virginia
    "I'd call that delicate."

    Like a Ferrari is delicate. :D

    If you want a gun to shoot and ignore and are willing to accept the looser tolerances and other design differences, well, have at it. There's one piece on the Colt that needs attention, so it's no big deal unless you ignore it and ignore it and ignore it.

    Come to think of it, all cars are delicate if you don't change the oil regularly.

    John
     
  25. 71Commander

    71Commander Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Messages:
    2,336
    Location:
    Headin back to Johnson City
    I don't like Pythons. The cylinder turns the wrong way.:D

    I'll keep my 686.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page