Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

S&W 629 in 6? 5? 4?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by Classified00, Sep 21, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Classified00

    Classified00 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2003
    Messages:
    214
    Location:
    DFW, TX
    Howdy all,

    I'm dangerously close to buying a S&W 629. I definately don't want the 6" barrel. I really like the looks of the 4" barrel. Does it add much recoil vs. the 5"? :confused:

    The gun will not be used for concealed carry. It will mostly be a range gun but it will see some carry in the great outdoors (either in an OC holster or a pack). :scrutiny:

    Thanks!
    :cool:
     
  2. Kernel

    Kernel Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2003
    Messages:
    2,005
    Location:
    77 Square Miles Surrounded by Reality (Madison), W
    I have a 5" "Classic" and think the barrel length is perfect, based on the aesthetics of the 629's frame size and the .44 Mag's internal ballistics. Anything shorter wouldn't look right or shoot right, IMO.
     
  3. rd2007

    rd2007 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2009
    Messages:
    317
    Location:
    San Antonio, TX
    I just bought a 6" 629 in June and am looking to sell it. Too bad you're not further south... I'd highly recommend shooting one if you can, though, unless you're a huge fan of recoil. I actually like it a lot, but this 629 pushes the limit of my enjoyment..
     
  4. TuckerNielson

    TuckerNielson Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2009
    Messages:
    42
    I own a S&W 625 JM, which is fairly similar, and I have been pleasantly surprised at how much I enjoy the 4" barrel. Obviously the 45acp is a whole different animal but like you, I just take it to the range to shoot. It feels just fine to me, very well balanced.

    My two cents.
     
  5. Stainz

    Stainz Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Messages:
    3,117
    Location:
    Pinson, AL
    I agree re the 625JM - it's a larger bore, but kinder on the wrist and pocket book, choice. You can buy .45 ACP's anywhere - and reasonably, too. Mine is a keeper, and so are my two 629's - but only because I reload.

    I consider my 629's, a 4" & 6", as .44 Specials, even if they do launch a bunch of mild Magnums. This is only possible because I reload - and can load 'Special' level loads in Magnum cases. The 6" handles and points great - I've even mounted a 2x28mm scope on mine a few times, too. Great range gun. It would make a great white tail gun, too. The 4" is only two ounces lighter, missing literally just the 2" of barrel from the 6"-er. I'd likely keep the 4" longer - but the 6" is close behind.

    Stainz
     
  6. huntershooter

    huntershooter Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    1,058
    Hard to beat the 4" 629 for a woods packin' gun.

    [​IMG]
     
  7. Ala Dan

    Ala Dan Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,879
    Location:
    Home Of The First Capitol Of The Confederate State
    5" Classic
     
  8. Nomad

    Nomad Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2010
    Messages:
    268
    I doubt you could go wrong with either the 4" or 5" barrel. I've owned both but I think I prefer the 4". Truthfully I'm not sure I could tell the difference between the two. You may gain 25 to 50 fps on the chrono with a 5" but in the field that gain has little practical value.
     
  9. Oceans

    Oceans Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    153
    The 4 inch half lug is obviously the handiest and lightest, but some states will not let you hunt with a 4 inch barrel revolver, like here in MD, you have to have at least a 6 inch, though, if you measure from the recoil shield to the muzzle, a 5.5 would be ok, depends on where they take the measurement. Also, if you are hunting whitetails, you would probably want an expanding hollow point moving over 1250 fps to ensure expansion on modern constructed hollow point bullet designs. Here, in this case, every fps counts, and the 6 inch should give you more velocity than the 4 inch. The 6 inch 629 in half lug, handles very well, it is really a fun revolver to shoot, but the 4 inch is a very handy belt gun. The classics with the full underlug seem muzzle heavy to me, and I prefer the half lug.
     
  10. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    33,545
    Location:
    Central PA
    I shoot the 4" in IDPA and carry it concealed regularly. I've shot the longer ones but the .44 Mag cartridge just doesn't seem to need quite that much gun.

    I shoot mostly .44 Spc. in competition but have no problem handling 300 gr., 1250 fps loads through it as well. In fact, recently ran a competition side match using those loads including weak hand and "Bill Drills." Fun, "boomy," but not painful or hard to control.

    4" is useful and flexible. 5" is as well, but not as much. 6" would be a safe queen for me.
     
  11. Legionnaire

    Legionnaire Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    4,070
    Location:
    Texas
    I'd probably opt for the 4-inch ... if I didn't already have a 3. :neener: But I intend mine for carry. My range .44 is a Ruger, and it has a 5.5-inch barrel.
     
  12. Marshall

    Marshall Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    5,569
    Location:
    Oklahoma, Green Country
    Hunting... I prefer a 6".
    Carry... I prefer a 4".
    All around...I'm with Ala Dan, definitely the 5".
     
  13. Stainz

    Stainz Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Messages:
    3,117
    Location:
    Pinson, AL
    Here are my 4" & 6" with Ahrends wood grips - ready for .44 Russians, Specials, and milder Magnums:

    [​IMG]

    And here is my 6" sporting a Weigand SS scope rail in lieu of the rear sight. The 2x28mm Weaver H2 corrects for my prebsbyopia.

    [​IMG]

    The 6" 629 also sports the Hogue made-for-S&W .500 Magnum monogrips - which pad that backstrap for recoil help. The X-frame grips fit K, L, & N, too.

    Stainz
     
  14. Confederate

    Confederate Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,104
    Location:
    Bethesda, MD
    I can't imagine why someone would want to have a 629 with a barrel less than 6-inches. These guns are vicious kickers, and they are made for ranges of about 75-100 yards for most games.

    If you want a shorter barrel, consider a .357.
     
  15. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    33,545
    Location:
    Central PA
    Considering how they can fire anything from cowboy-fart .44 Russians, a wide variety of .44 Special loads, and all but the heaviest of .44 Mag loads, that's too broad a statement.

    I've fired around 10,000 .44 Specials through mine in competition. 200 gr. bullet at 850 fps. My 7 year old daughter shoots those ... not exactly a "vicious kicker."

    Even "powerful" 300 gr. loads aren't much of a bother. Use good technique and work up to them if you feel the need, but for goodness' sake, they aren't going to hurt you!

    Mine must be broken. ;) Don't think I've ever tried to shoot it that far. Works great at contact-distance out to 35 yds, though, which is why I bought it.
     
  16. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    33,545
    Location:
    Central PA
    The vicious kicker in action:

    [​IMG]

    :)
     
  17. thunder173

    thunder173 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2007
    Messages:
    813
    Location:
    Upper Peninsula, Michigan
    Had a 4 inch 629,..had to let it go some time back, and have been kicking self in the rear since. Was a sweet shooter with .44 Special and wasn't all that bad with 240 grain JSP .44 Mags. It was a great woods carry gun. Five inchers are nice as well. If I needed a 6 inch to control the recoil,...I'd get a rifle instead.... :)

    Just sayin'.............
     
  18. Classified00

    Classified00 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2003
    Messages:
    214
    Location:
    DFW, TX
    The answer is clear as mud :eek: :p
     
  19. thunder173

    thunder173 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2007
    Messages:
    813
    Location:
    Upper Peninsula, Michigan
    Choices.

    The spice of life!!

    Of course ya could fall back on the old,.."when in doubt,...get one of each" rule!!! :)
     
  20. Wolfeye

    Wolfeye Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2008
    Messages:
    314
    Location:
    Washington
    I'm mostly familiar with the 6" 629. The 4" would be more comfortable in the holster, but on the range I'd prefer the longer 6". 4-inchers don't really let the bullet develop its full velocity potential... and they are loud. A full-sized 6" gun isn't all that much of an inconvenience to carry.
     
  21. rjrivero

    rjrivero Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,064
    5" is the shortest you can hunt with in Ohio. 5" for me. ;)
     
  22. Legionnaire

    Legionnaire Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    4,070
    Location:
    Texas
    Nice pic, Sam. That young'n has a good grip!
     
  23. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    33,545
    Location:
    Central PA
    Thanks! :)

    She's seen a bit of shooting in her (now 8) years and has a pretty strict instructor! ;)

    No 7 year old girl in my house is going to go "tea-cupping" a .44 revolver! :D
     
  24. Classified00

    Classified00 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2003
    Messages:
    214
    Location:
    DFW, TX
    UPDATE :what:

    Thank you all for your thoughts. I ended up going with the 4". I held both the 4" and 5" for a long time and in the end the 4" felt and looked better.

    It's an awesome gun BTW! My largest revolver by far. Hopefully I can get to the range next weekend. Now to decide on grips and leather :confused:
     
  25. CraigC
    • Contributing Member

    CraigC Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    14,284
    Location:
    West Tennessee
    IMHO, a 4" N-frame is packin' pistol supreme and makes for a great woods companion. Though I don't quite understand why some folks think the 6" is so unweildy. Velocity difference between the two will be dependent upon many more factors than barrel length alone and a short barrel can indeed shoot faster than a longer one. I also find shorter barrels to actually be more pleasant to shoot. A well-known gunsmith stated that it's because the shorter barrel has less leverage against your wrist. That said, proper grips are critical. I don't know how anybody gets by with those narrow Hogues with the funky palm swells.

    I have yet to add one to the accumulation but I think the 5" Classic would make a dandy general purpose sixgun.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page