Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

S&w 686-3 2.5"

Discussion in 'Firearms Research' started by Jlr2267, Apr 20, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Jlr2267

    Jlr2267 Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,209
    Location:
    South Carolina
    Found this little gem at a local pawn, but don't know that much about S&W revolvers, having been a Ruger fan since a young man. It is a 686-3 with 2.5" barrel, serial starts BFK. No internal lock.

    Hoping someone can tell me year of manufacture, and the differences in the -3 and-4 models. I had never seen the 2.5" only 3"+, and it just said "take me home, please"

    Shooting mainly Rugers for years, I couldn't believe the trigger on this 686...about as good as it gets. I had a 686-6 w/6" barrel a few years ago and it was NOTHING like this gun, not even close in terms of trigger break and fit/finish.

    Traded a Ruger 44 carbine for it:
    [​IMG]

    I see Altamont grips in my near future :)
     
  2. eastbank

    eastbank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Messages:
    2,566
    my 2.5" barreled 686-3 is in the bdb6140 serial range,but i would also know when it was made. to me its the nicest short barreled .357 magnum made. eastbank.
     

    Attached Files:

  3. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
  4. Ron James

    Ron James Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2006
    Messages:
    2,335
    Location:
    Arizona
    Earlier I started to research the numbers, I arrived at 1990 for the BDB but then my eyes started to cross and I said the heck with it. On modern S&W's it is no longer a simple look up, now you have to play with the alphabet.
     
  5. Jlr2267

    Jlr2267 Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,209
    Location:
    South Carolina
    Thanks RC. I usually access THR from a mobile device and cannot easily see all the different forums/stickies (just the way it displays in tapatalk).
     
  6. Jim K

    Jim K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    17,566
    I hate to say this, but all too often a great trigger pull means someone has worked on the trigger. I suggest having someone more familiar with S&W revolvers check to see if the pull is too "good". Or try pushing the hammer off full cock.

    Jim
     
  7. Jlr2267

    Jlr2267 Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,209
    Location:
    South Carolina
    I did the hammer push...all good. I think its just that I am used to the GP100 and Redhawk triggers. This one can't be more than 2 to 3 lbs in single action. My previous 686 trigger was heavier, but it was brand new.
     
  8. kitsapshooter

    kitsapshooter Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2013
    Messages:
    251
    Location:
    Washington - the wet side
    The 686 pre-lock triggers are built with fantastic triggers.
    smith-wessonforum.com is a great resource. Or do what i did when I had questions about a smith. I called the factory and ask a lot of questions.
     
  9. Ironnewt

    Ironnewt Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2007
    Messages:
    2
    Location:
    Baltimore, MD
    Contact you local PD and ask for their armory unit (or find out who worked on their duty pistols) Even though almost everyone is now issued a Semi-auto, most of us (myself included) carried a S&W M-10 or a M-19 and the K-frame action is the same as the L-frame. The guy may be retired but working on guns is not something you forget.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page