Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

S&W 696s in 44 Spcl...Opinions...?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by Gila Jorge, Jan 10, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Gila Jorge

    Gila Jorge Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    278
    Location:
    El Paso, Texas
    Am considering getting one before they are discontinued by Smith. Have heard rumors to that effect on Smith board. I want one for CCW usage
    and I love 44 Spcls... In fact 44 is my favorite flavor. Did they ever make them with the old style hammer with the pin on the hammer or were they all frame mounted pins,,,? Thanks all in advance.
     
  2. Kahr carrier

    Kahr carrier Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    2,060
    Location:
    WESTSIDE
    They used to make them in Stainless Firing pin in the Hammer I beleive they were the 624.:)
     
  3. SouthpawShootr

    SouthpawShootr Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    2,627
    Location:
    Chesapeake, VA
    624 was an N-frame. 696, I believe, is a 5-shot L-frame. I need to get one of these. There don't seem to be many around.
     
  4. Porter Rockwell

    Porter Rockwell Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    226
    S&W 696-

    The gun is stronger than the rag writers would have you believe and very accurate. My partners had to open the throats for much better accuracy with cast bullets. The smith charged him $30.00 as he needed a new reamer. It seems many of the Smiths are a little tight (.428) in both the Specials and the Magnums.
     
  5. The Mighty Beagle

    The Mighty Beagle Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    218
    I had one but ended up selling it. It was an ok gun, but even though I like the .44 Special I never found anything "special" about my example.

    Balance was great, had a nice feel to it, but the gun was quite chunky and heavy for CCW. Yet it didn't seem nearly as heavy as I desired when I shot it, as it definitely had some recoil even with reasonable loads. It wasn't that bad, just more than I wanted for a .44 fun gun. I can remember wishing for a larger, heavier N-frame for .44 Spec. shooting.

    Accuracy in my gun was disappointing, even after installing a Patridge front sight and sending it back to Smith for a re-cut forcing cone. It never did get under 2.5" - 3" groups at 20 yds. or so with my best reloading efforts, and after I repeatedly missed a rabid coon at about 20 yds. with it I decided a more accurate gun was needed.

    I came away thinking that Smith must be doing something funky with their rifling to have screwed up what should have been a really accurate gun.

    One other thing - I bought the gun thinking I had found an intelligent alternative to the .357 3-inchers, with their flash and blast. To my surprise, my 3-inch .44 Spec. was astonishingly loud, to the point of being about as unpleasant as firing a .357 snub.

    I finally just got a .357 and now have accuracy, much better ballistics, less recoil, readily-available components, and a similar amount of noise. That being said, I'd like to try another 696 as I really liked the feel and balance.
     
  6. VictorLouis

    VictorLouis Guest

    Yes Gila Jorge,

    They were introduced pre-MIM, with hammer-nose, though they've always been stainless.
     
  7. NEon

    NEon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    74
    Trying to trade a buddy of mine out of one as we speak. He brought it over yesterday to the Steeler's game, and is bringing it back for the Raider's game today. Hope I can keep it here. Have several L frame guns, from 2 1/2 inch on up. Would love to add this to the stable! :D
     
  8. zeke

    zeke Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    638
    Location:
    NW Wi
    The original 696 had hammer mounted firing pin, the second version (696-1) has frame mounted pin.

    Blazer's 200 gn hp is very accurate in these pistols, would not advise reaming the cylinders for lead, but siziing the lead to .429 (or buying .429)for the tighter cylinder throats.

    Am happier with the original version.
     
  9. Yanus

    Yanus Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    216
    Location:
    Central TX
    I also have a 696. They are good little guns. In fact, I just ordered a OWB pancake holster from FIST for a carry rig.
    My 696 has a pretty good double action pull for a later Smith.
    It is definitely a keeper.........

    Yanus
     
  10. 9mmepiphany

    9mmepiphany Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    18,984
    Location:
    northern california
    i took one in on a trade for a colt ACP a few of years ago and it was very nice.

    i like the fact that it came with the colorcased hammer and trigger, hogue hardwood mono-grips as well as being mag-na-ported. the trigger was clean, but nothing to write home about. the 3" barrel balances nicely while still being compact and retaining the full lenght ejection rod.

    i took a out and shot it during qualifications and it was deadly accurate with the blazer 200gr gold dots. recoil was about on par with .38spl ball ammo (158gr lead roundnose)...very controlable during double taps.

    it would get more use except for my being too lazy to hunt down accessories for it...selection is a little limited too ;) ...

    HKS makes the only speedloaders i could find for it...i now have two
    there are no rubber speed strips made for it...i've been told that the stripper clips from an .303 enfield work
    a dedicated holster (3" barrel) is pretty much a custom thing...currently using the fobus paddle holster (4") and pondering over a kramer
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page