Hypnogator
Member
OK, OK, I've been bitten by the AR-15 bug! I'm looking for an M-4gery type carbine for two purposes: Defense, target shooting, and varmint hunting, but also to use with a drop-in CO2 activated laser kit to use with a judgmental use-of-force simulator for law enforcement training. For that reason, I need a carbine-type weapon that is commonly used by law enforcement. I also need it to be, well, "tacti-cool" to favorably impress police trainers and using officers.
After quite a bit of looking on line, I had pretty much settled on the Rock River Arms Tactical Carbine A4 with free-floating quad rail, and quad rail gas block with folding back-up front sight. Yesterday, however, I went to Sportsman's Warehouse in Lewisville, where their resident AR-15 expert recommended the S&W 15T. They didn't stock RRA, but I compared it quite favorably to a Bushmaster.
Today, at Cheaper Than Dirt, I was able to compare the two weapons side-by-side, and there doesn't seem to be much difference in price between the two weapons with similar features.
Here's what I'm looking at: RRA Tactical A4 as low as $900, plus $85 for quad rail gas block, $80 for folding front sight, $120 for free-floating aluminum quad rail, $40 for chrome lined barrel, and $8 for a set of rail covers. Total $1232.
S&W 15T as low as $1200 including all the above features, but will need $135 Timney trigger to equal the RRA's competition trigger. Total $1335. The Smith is, obviously about $100 higher, but reviews I've read say it has one of, if not the best quad rail system made, and arguably the best flip-up back-up front and rear sights, as well.
Would appreciate any thoughts or experiences from anyone who has used either, or especially, both. Which do you think represents the most, er, "bang for the buck?" Thanks, all!
After quite a bit of looking on line, I had pretty much settled on the Rock River Arms Tactical Carbine A4 with free-floating quad rail, and quad rail gas block with folding back-up front sight. Yesterday, however, I went to Sportsman's Warehouse in Lewisville, where their resident AR-15 expert recommended the S&W 15T. They didn't stock RRA, but I compared it quite favorably to a Bushmaster.
Today, at Cheaper Than Dirt, I was able to compare the two weapons side-by-side, and there doesn't seem to be much difference in price between the two weapons with similar features.
Here's what I'm looking at: RRA Tactical A4 as low as $900, plus $85 for quad rail gas block, $80 for folding front sight, $120 for free-floating aluminum quad rail, $40 for chrome lined barrel, and $8 for a set of rail covers. Total $1232.
S&W 15T as low as $1200 including all the above features, but will need $135 Timney trigger to equal the RRA's competition trigger. Total $1335. The Smith is, obviously about $100 higher, but reviews I've read say it has one of, if not the best quad rail system made, and arguably the best flip-up back-up front and rear sights, as well.
Would appreciate any thoughts or experiences from anyone who has used either, or especially, both. Which do you think represents the most, er, "bang for the buck?" Thanks, all!