Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Sa emp 9mm vs 40 sw.

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by mrt949, Feb 11, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mrt949

    mrt949 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    221
    Pros or cons of the different calibers or frame materials
     
  2. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    48,907
    Location:
    Alabama
    I love my 9MM EMP. I have never seen a .40 EMP, except in a picture back when they teased us about one in .40.

    Materials? Standard Steel slide with Aluminum frame set up. :)
     
  3. 9mmepiphany

    9mmepiphany Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    18,986
    Location:
    northern california
    the .40 EMP has a steel frame so it would be heavier. the .40 would have sharper recoil based on it's sharper pressure peak. i would think the 9mm would be inherently more accurate
     
  4. CPshooter

    CPshooter Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,420
    I didn't know that..
     
  5. 9mmepiphany

    9mmepiphany Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    18,986
    Location:
    northern california
    the one i handled at the SHOT Show in 2008 had a steel frame. i haven't seen one at a dealer yet.
     
  6. CPshooter

    CPshooter Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,420
    Ahh, I see. It's been a year so who knows what they will end up using for the production version. I don't see why they would stray from the aluminum alloy unless the .40s&w is just too devastating for the frame to handle. However, I don't see that being the case considering the Sig P229 and P226 are such hot sellers in .40s&w. I guess we'll see when they hit the stores.
     
  7. 9mmepiphany

    9mmepiphany Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    18,986
    Location:
    northern california
    i'm waiting too.

    i asked about the weight and they mentioned that they had "concerns" because of the sharp recoil pulse, less mass to the slide (compared to the 229 and 226) and the shorter travel distance available
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page