BTW, I strongly supported the action in Iraq and still do, but I hate when our military allows a lie to continue through omission of the facts.
So far, I haven't seen a single member of the military(other than a few Army doctors speaking about her injuries) speak to the issues surrounding Pvt. Lynch's capture/firefight/lack thereof/etc...
I have seen reports that talked about "sources" that remain unnamed to this day. Not to mention what's his name - the urinalist from the New York Slimes - who was fired for making up virtually all of his articles, not least of which, was the story about Pvt. Lynch's family home. His description of their home was
totally wrong, not one word of it was true, not one.
So now tell me, what can the military do to put out the correct story, when the leftists in this country are so bold as to be willing to describe the home of Pvt. Lynch's as being on a hilltop surrounded by tobacco fields and livestock, when it is actually in a river bottom, surrounded by woods?
While we are at it, tell me another thing. I'm supposed to believe the Iraqi piece of
"doctor", right???????
If he is a person that I am expected to believe; why then did he not treat Pvt. Lynch's wounds when she was in his care? Why is it that he said, on ABC television, that he was about to treat her the morning
following the night of her rescue????????? Was the Iraqi POS "doctor" waiting for something in particular to happen for the week or so that she was in his hospital? Is it traditional for those
ers to wait a week or two before setting a broken bone? Somehow, I think not. And if the "doctor" is that much of a POS quack (in his chosen profession) then his opinion on firefights, and reasonable/unreasonable force to rescue an American soldier are of
ZERO value to me.