Scalia hates the founding fathers... the treacherous dog!

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Grey54956, Dec 21, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Grey54956

    Grey54956 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2003
    Messages:
    634
    Location:
    IN
  2. Chris Rhines

    Chris Rhines Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,772
    Location:
    Potomac, Maryland - Behind enemy lines!!
    Did you actually read the article you linked to? It says nothing about Scalia hating Thomas Jefferson at all.

    - Chris
     
  3. Langenator

    Langenator Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2003
    Messages:
    2,688
    Location:
    Ft Belvoir, VA
    If you really think Scalia is hostile to our rights and freedoms, you obviously haven't read his dissent in McConnell v FEC, which can only be described as scathing.
     
  4. Tim Burke

    Tim Burke Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,130
    Someone hasn't been paying attention.
    Read his opinions, especially his dissents. The only problem with Scalia on the SC is that there aren't 7 more like him.
     
  5. Khornet

    Khornet Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    1,861
    Location:
    NH
    For some folks

    "civil rights" means unlimited pornography, government racism, and the right to give Uncle Sam the finger. Scalia is indeed and enemy of those rights. Good on him.
     
  6. Quartus

    Quartus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,172
    Location:
    Virginia
    You guys just don't get it, do you? Let me spell it out for you: Scalia dared to think that Thomas Jefferson was NOT perfect and made some mistakes.

    That's just the same as hating all the Founding Fathers!!!


    Yeah.


    :rolleyes:


    With friends like these....
     
  7. Carlos

    Carlos Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2003
    Messages:
    1,196
    Location:
    Portland, Oregon
    YA, think we got a little carried away there. WTH does a mock trial have to do with anything real????!!!!
     
  8. Jeeper

    Jeeper Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,062
    Location:
    Mesa, AZ
    Grey54956

    Saying this shows how little you know about Scalia and the supreme court in general. He would be one of 2 perhaps three people on the current court that would hold that the 2nd amend. is an individual right. He is probably one of the best allies for us. next time try and be a little more educated about what you are discussing.
     
  9. redneck2

    redneck2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    17,000
    Location:
    Northern Indiana
    Yeah, right...

    mebbe we should have 9 like Ginsberg...

    only thing missing then would be referring to everyone as "comrade"

    Scalia is one of the few thin treads saving us from socialism
     
  10. aikidoka-mks

    aikidoka-mks Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    148
    Location:
    Hammond, Indiana
    Yes please do bit more research. Firing from the hip sometimes leads to embarrassment. We need more like Scalia!

    Mark
     
  11. aikidoka-mks

    aikidoka-mks Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    148
    Location:
    Hammond, Indiana
    Yes please do bit more research. Firing from the hip sometimes leads to embarrassment. We need more like Scalia!

    Mark
     
  12. Frohickey

    Frohickey Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,018
    Location:
    People's Republic of California
    I think Grey56956 needs to reread the article...

    I also think that we should have a mock declaration of war against Napoleon and the French... followed by a general French surrender. :D
     
  13. Mark Tyson

    Mark Tyson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    2,523
    Location:
    Where the one eyed man is king
    Say what?

    Grey, this is a MOCK trial, and furthermore from your comments I don't think you know Scalia's legal philosophy from a wet napkin. Go read "A Matter of Interpretation" and then get back to us.

    Edited to add: Sorry for being so harsh, but calling the man a "treacherous dog" is also pretty low.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice