Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Scary AP Poll?

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by cgjunk2, Aug 26, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. cgjunk2

    cgjunk2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2004
    Messages:
    62
  2. 1 old 0311

    1 old 0311 member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2005
    Messages:
    2,672
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    They do have a right to dissagree. They DO NOT have a right to give aid and comfort to the enemy. Some are getting real close.

    Kevin
     
  3. Delmar

    Delmar Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,052
    Location:
    Cedar Bluff, VA
    I am a big 1st amendment supporter, but I have some serious issues with some of these protests against the war outside of a funeral home where services are being held of a fallen soldier. I also have issues with those who protest the war outside a a military hospital. Along with the right, comes the duty and responsibility.

    Wanna protest the government? Fine, take your beef to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave-its the white house with the big pillars in front. I'm sure the news people are going to flock to you in order to find out what your grievance is. Thats what they do for a living.

    Those few who are doing these things are setting themselves up for a backlash that I HOPE they don't like.

    I guess you can't legislate morality-neither can you legislate good taste. To do so endangers the constitution.
     
  4. dpesec

    dpesec Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2005
    Messages:
    565
    I also saw on Fox News yesterday that for the first time over 50% of the people disagre with being in Iraq. Not a goo omen. :eek:
     
  5. Delmar

    Delmar Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,052
    Location:
    Cedar Bluff, VA
    dpesec - Does it make you wonder how the question was posed to those polled?

    Kind of like "Do you believe firearms should be in the hands of the mentally deranged?"

    Latest galluping poll says most folks don't think people should own guns!
     
  6. Joejojoba111

    Joejojoba111 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,056
    "I am a big 1st amendment supporter, but I have some serious issues with some of these protests against the war outside of a funeral home where services are being held of a fallen soldier."

    I already think the law has means to handle these situations.

    A)The funeral home or the veteran's hospital can remove the protesters from their property (I don't really believe the story about the veteran's hospital, because of this).

    B)If untruths are being said, then this is a case for the courts too. Someone says your dead son was a baby-killer, then the law has means to rectify this situation. The slanderer will have to prove their assertions in court (in slander the burden of proof is reversed) and quite likely they will not receive legal aid to do so.

    C)Sue for emotional discomfort.

    D)Restraining order, because your psychiatrist says you are going crazy with their harassment. Or something like that.

    And so-on and so-on and so-on and so-on. And so-on.

    There is NO justifiable reason to abrogate constitutionally-enshrined liberties. People publishing articles suggesting there are, well I think those people are acting against America, perhaps they don't know it, perhaps they do.
     
  7. geekWithA.45

    geekWithA.45 Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    9,040
    Location:
    SouthEast PA
    I have very little faith in most pollster's ability to concoct proper polls or derive meaningful and reliable information from them.

    I have even less faith in the presses' ability to interpret and report on those results.
     
  8. CAS700850

    CAS700850 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    1,304
    Location:
    Central Ohio
    America. Gotta love it. We're a group of people all about protecting our 2A rights. There's a huge thread over at L&P on the issue of teh War on Drugs and personal liberties. And, here we have a thread asking if a poll showing support for the right of people to exercise their 1A rights and protest the war is "scary?"

    My biggest problem with the ACLU is their method of counting Amendments...1, 3, 4, 5, etc.

    By the way, personally, I believe that they should all go to D.C., and protest the war like crazy. Leave the soldiers alone.
     
  9. Polishrifleman

    Polishrifleman Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    848
    Location:
    Puget Sound, Washington
    Why is this a problem? Why is it scary? Like said above it depends on how the question was asked.

    Do you feel it is ok for individuals to outwardly, vocally, with signs, t-shirts, etc.. within the bounds of the law protest the war in Iraq?

    They have the right to do so and hopefully they do it with courtesey and respect. Unfortunately there is problem with them crossing the line at times.

    The problem I have with the article is that the people polled were obviously asked there political affiliation. What does that matter? We are and should be Americans first and foremost!!!!
     
  10. dpesec

    dpesec Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2005
    Messages:
    565
    Geek, 100% correct, how questions are phrased, plus the lead-up can impact the results. People who believe that the war is needed will be less likely to say so because they don't want to be in the minorty, which in turns adds more fuel to the fire.

    What I'm affraid of is that we're startign to the impact of the constant carping. What ever the US does is bad, everybody else is good.

    There was dissent about Vietnam but the movement gathered steam when Walter Kronkite said "We can not win this war" on the CBS news, that was the spark.

    I wish I could remember the general was that said the troops' morale would be good as long as they knew the US was behind them. I'm getting worried that our support is weakening.
     
  11. wingnutx

    wingnutx Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,047
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    I support the right to say damn near any fool thing that pops into their little heads.

    I'd much rather they be straightforward and call me a baby-killer than cry crocodile tears and pretend to support me as a political tactic, but they have the right to do it.
     
  12. cgjunk2

    cgjunk2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2004
    Messages:
    62
    Just to clarify... It is scary that we are asking whether or not folks back someone else's RIGHT to protest because it is precisely that, a RIGHT (whether we like their tactics/messages or not). The fact that this question is being asked implies that it is debatable.

    However, I am a bit surprised to find that this right apparently is debatable based on the discussions I've read in the other threads mentioned above.

    This whole mess reminds me of what (I think it was) Rumsfeld said: Democracies are a messy thing. People will not fall in line in a Democracy. Folks should never expect that in a democracy. That is what it is all about in my view.
     
  13. Sleeping Dog

    Sleeping Dog Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,255
    Location:
    MI
    Certainly there's a right to protest, to disagree with Govt policy. THR's have enough differences over the cause of the Iraq conflict, abortion, other issues.

    It seems to cross a line of decency when protesting at a hospital "Nyah, nyah, I got two eyes and you got none, ya low-life soldier".

    Or protesting at a funeral "Nyah, Nyah, your daughter got blowed up ha ha!"

    Some protesters just need killin. Not because of their stand on issues. Just because they're rude.

    In vino veritas.
     
  14. Smoke

    Smoke Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    3,245
    Location:
    Bosque County, Texas
    I had to drive through Crawford today. Saw much, but not all of the hub-bub.
    Don't have a problem with them protesting out there.

    It's the ones protesting at Walter Reed that I really have a problem with.

    Let them protest all they want. They DO have a right to do it, they are making asses of themselves.

    Smoke
     
  15. psyopspec

    psyopspec Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2004
    Messages:
    4,159
    Location:
    Cape Cod
    In the news vid I saw, they were outside the gates of the hospital on public ground.
     
  16. Monkeyleg

    Monkeyleg Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    5,058
    Location:
    Decatur, AL
    "Our attention span is simply shorter," said Charles Franklin, a political scientist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. "Our willingness to put up with a difficult military situation and losses isn't what it used to be."

    Bingo.
     
  17. cgjunk2

    cgjunk2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2004
    Messages:
    62
    Most of the things I have read or seen seem to show protesters that are sympathetic to the soldiers, but are upset at our civilian leadership that has put them in the situation they are in now. I can't see how anyone besides the most idiotic would think insulting a soldier would be beneficial to their cause. The soldier has nothing to do with the situation, soldiers follow orders. Anti war protesters just feel that they need to make sure the civilian leadership does a better job of deciding when, where, and how our soldiers should be used.

    Now I'm not saying there aren't idiots out there that would insult soldiers personally, but I think it would be a stretch to think that they are the backbone of the "anti-war" protest (whatever that is).
     
  18. cgjunk2

    cgjunk2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2004
    Messages:
    62
    Oh, by the way, I also agree that people should be free to make total asses of themselves when exercising there 1st amendment rights. It is not worth suggesting that limits be placed on free speech because of a few jerks that do a good enough job of discrediting themselves. It is unfortunate, yes, but the alternative is worse.
     
  19. Firethorn

    Firethorn Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2004
    Messages:
    1,386
    I believe that the best responce to these acts are counter protests. I think that unless they're creating an outragous disturbance, they should be allowed to protest whatever they want. From this to the fact that the FSM* theory of creation isn't being taught in school.

    *FSM:Flying Spagetti Monster
     
  20. HankB

    HankB Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2003
    Messages:
    5,212
    Location:
    Central Texas
    People have the right to peacefully protest. That includes the right to peacefully protest those whose protests you disagree with.

    If you go back a few years, consider the Dixie Chicks. They were - and still are! - free to mouth off all they want against Bush, without fear of being thrown in jail. But their former fans are free to stop buying their music, stop patronizing stores that sell it, stop listening to radio stations that play their music, and stop buying stuff from businesses that buy ads on those radio stations.

    Other people have free speech rights, too, and there's no constitutional right to an audience. A peaceful counter-protest does NOT infringe on the rights of the original protestors.

    As far as polls on Iraq are concerned, disagreement with Bush on what we're doing there does NOT repeat NOT automatically mean one agrees with Cindy Sheehan. (For example, how many here agree with the 1st politically-ordered pullout from Fallujah, a decision that was roundly criticized at the time for being militarily unsound?)
     
  21. PCGS65

    PCGS65 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2005
    Messages:
    765
    I am a strong supporter of freedom of speech even though we can be put in jail for it. However there's a fine line between freedom of speech and disturbing the public. Right after 9/11 80-90% of the people were all for going after terrorists in afgahnistan and iraq. But as time goes on people forget and then start second guessing things. The president did what the majority of the people wanted after 9/11. But now he's considered a tyrant for doing so? The people need to blame themself not the president. Just the way I see it.
     
  22. Derby FALs

    Derby FALs Member In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2004
    Messages:
    978
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    I don't believe that is a "Free Speech Zone" anymore. If you protest around the President their are very limited places (free speech zones) you can do it. Usually miles away from where he actually is located. This policy started with Clinton but Bush is taking advantage of it even more.
     
  23. ak47nevada

    ak47nevada Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    91
    It's amazing those Liberal Scumbags have the gall to protest right outside a military installation... But it's fine with the ACLU.

    Have an open carry 2nd amendment ralley outside a federal installation and watch the tanks descend on the group of protestors.
     
  24. charliew

    charliew Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    10
    Location:
    Middle Tennessee
  25. MrTuffPaws

    MrTuffPaws Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,511
    Location:
    Az
    It is so funny around here. We have people ready to give their life for the 2nd, but state that the 1st goes to far. :scrutiny: All 10 should be treated at equal
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page