Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Scope Mount on my Winchester 94

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Magnum460, Jun 5, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Magnum460

    Magnum460 Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2008
    Messages:
    5
    I'm wondering, just out of curiosity, how I can mount a scope on my non-angle eject Winchester Model 94. It is a 1970's model in the .30-30. I heard that mounting a scope on a non-angle eject is rather "goofy", but I'm also wondering, in this case, what "goofy" actually means. I know that I have to use a scope mount that doesn't obstruct the ejection, so the mount has to sit off-to-the-side. HELP ME OUT :D! Please include a price on the scope mount if possible.
     
  2. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
  3. rodregier

    rodregier Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,677
    Location:
    Halifax,NS Canada
    There were forward-deployed mounts made for the non-AE W94, but they are out of production to my knowledge. I managed to buy a Leupold version used from a fellow several years ago. No, it isn't for resale.

    To quote "Monty Python and the Holy Grail", "...it's very nice!".
     
  4. yakkingallover

    yakkingallover Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    184
    Location:
    Jacksonville,Fl
    I bought my 94 and it has a weaver rail bolted to the left side for a red dot, not really a scope but the previous owner said it was great. I have a scope on my Marlin so the rail is coming off the 94 and it will stay pure with iron sights. PM me if ya wanna go that route, it can be had for a smoking deal.
     
  5. Nhsport

    Nhsport Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2006
    Messages:
    581
    I am 54 and have well,54 year old eyes. The use of standard Winchester sights is pretty much past me.
    I think a scope is a poor fit on the 94 . The stock is alltogether the wrong shape and getting a good mount is difficult.
    The old school solution is a peep sight. You might have the two small holes on the left side of the rieciver but if not it is a pretty simple task for a smith to do the drilling and tapping.
    A peep is fast,allows good accuracy and solves many types of eye problems. It looks right on the gun,doesn't mess up the balance and is cheeper than a scope and mounts.

    If you feel you have to have a scope -go for it ,just consider that a good peep might work out better for you.
     
  6. theotherwaldo

    theotherwaldo Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2008
    Messages:
    2,047
    Location:
    In the Wild Horse Desert of Texas
    I forward-mounted a Bushnell Phantom 2.5x pistol scope on one of my 94s. It was OK, but I preferred iron sights.

    BTW, the gun was already boogered up some by someone that used one of those side mounts that used existing frame holes. Problem was, the included mounting bolts were a poor match and allowed some movement in the mount. Ouch!
     
  7. PhilA

    PhilA Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2008
    Messages:
    94
    Apologies to the OP for what is most likely an unwanted answer, but...

    PLEASE don't scope your Winnie. That's the kind of rifle that simply wasn't meant to have a scope put on it. It's kinda like teats on a bull, you know?

    Again, sorry for the unsolicited advice, but I just couldn't help myself.
     
  8. bogie

    bogie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    9,569
    Location:
    St. Louis, in the Don't Show Me state
    Right. Some things are just wrong.

    If the target is so far away and so small that you need a scope for it, you need a bigger and more accurate rifle.
     
  9. Malamute

    Malamute Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    3,016
    Location:
    Rocky Mts
    Any 94 made from the early 50's on has enough holes to mount a receiver peep or a Weaver side mount without doing any more drilling. For some reason in the late 90's or so, Winchester quit drilling and tapping for receiver peep sights, but that doesnt affect you or your 70's gun.

    I see no reason not to scope a 94 if you want the extra clarity. I disagree about it being wrong. It does have a few quirks, such as, the scope should be rotated 1/4 turn counterclockwise so the scope adjusting turret doesnt get in the way of the ejecting shell. You then need to keep in mind that the windage and elevation knobs are reversed. A little common sense when sighting in takes care of that issue. Yes, it is a little off center when side mounted, I can deal with that better than I can deal with a marlin. I simply like Winchesters far better than marlins (and yes, I've owned a bunch of both).

    Most 94's are plenty accurate to use a scope, tho most people simply buy the cheapest ammo they can lay hands on and then say they arent accurate, but in thier bolt guns will try various loads, bullet weights, tinker with charges, etc,....There's also the issue of poor light, identifying horn count in some hunt areas, old eyesight. I see nothing wrong with a scope. Go for it.
     
  10. bellystalker

    bellystalker Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2
    i just put a scope and side mount on my pre 64 there was no drilling or taping done now ican hit the same mark at a 100 yards every time
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page