• Possible Downtime Alert

    I am working to migrate THR from the current cluster to a new one. I would like to get this done before the weekend, but it's unclear what the timeframe will be, as testing is still ongoing. As I am writing this the new (rebuilt) host is doing a burn-in to ensure that everything will keep running under load.

    When the migration happens users will see a Cloudflare message indicatating it cannot connect to the server. This is expected, and depending on how the migration goes this may last from 30 minutes to 3 hours - I won't know more until testing the various migration options is complete and I have finalized the plan.

    More information is available in this thread.

    As always, thanks so much for your patience.

sd ammo change/big deal?

Status
Not open for further replies.
In the three full magazine test it doesn't matter the number of cartridges fired. Yes, it will require more ammo to test a Glock than a 1911 - but the end result is the same - three full magazines of ammo were fired without a failure. At this point the ammo isn't suddenly going to start failing to feed and function. Ammo that doesn't reliably feed and function in the pistol will not pass the test.

9mmepiphany hit the nail on the head - it's the absolute minimum level of testing.
 
If you have something you know runs IMO it's not worth cost of the test ammo to switch when you are comparing modern reputable brands. Dudes often seem on the lookout for the next best wonder bullet, and companies are happily boastful in their marketing, but when comparing reputable big name modern lines, they are all pretty much the same.

No offense, but that's just silly in my opinion.

It may well be true that most modern "bullets" will perform just fine for self-defense depending on shot placement....
But, that in no way means all modern "cartridges" as a whole will function flawlessly in the same gun.
That's 2 VERY different things.

If I find some ammo in which the "bullet" is relatively the same thing and just as good as another...but it costs less as an example....
I'll still test that ammo for proper "function" in my gun before I just go arbitrarily trusting my very life to it.
:eek:
 
Water Man said:
MAH says Law Enforcement Sales Only for the Winchester Ranger ammo.

That is Winchester's policy...


Shawn Dodson said:
In the three full magazine test it doesn't matter the number of cartridges fired. Yes, it will require more ammo to test a Glock than a 1911 - but the end result is the same - three full magazines of ammo were fired without a failure. At this point the ammo isn't suddenly going to start failing to feed and function. Ammo that doesn't reliably feed and function in the pistol will not pass the test.

Is 24 rounds enough, in your opinion?

Sabbath Wolf said:
I'm not LEO and have over a 1k of both 9mm and 45acp Ranger right in front of me....lol
Bought it on line with no problems at all.
What or who is MAH?

I think I already posted a picture of some of my ammo. Note the Ranger. I am not LEO either. And I like MAH. (www.mahsupplies.net, referenced earlier in this thread)

Edit: Guess that was a different thread. Well, here is my shelf of semi auto JHP, note the Ranger. And I like MAH...

1bbd9dc6.gif
 
That is Winchester's policy...




Is 24 rounds enough, in your opinion?



I think I already posted a picture of some of my ammo. Note the Ranger. I am not LEO either. And I like MAH. (www.mahsupplies.net, referenced earlier in this thread)

Edit: Guess that was a different thread. Well, here is my shelf of semi auto JHP, note the Ranger. And I like MAH...

1bbd9dc6.gif



Now that's funny....lol
You have the exact same ammo I do.


15acd3f1.gif
 
I do. My local PD uses the 147gr T-series, has for years...good results. Some of the boxes you can't read are 127 +P+ as well as 147gr bonded.
 
If you have something you know runs IMO it's not worth cost of the test ammo to switch when you are comparing modern reputable brands. Dudes often seem on the lookout for the next best wonder bullet, and companies are happily boastful in their marketing, but when comparing reputable big name modern lines, they are all pretty much the same.
No offense, but that's just silly in my opinion. It may well be true that most modern "bullets" will perform just fine for self-defense depending on shot placement.... But, that in no way means all modern "cartridges" as a whole will function flawlessly in the same gun. That's 2 VERY different things. If I find some ammo in which the "bullet" is relatively the same thing and just as good as another...but it costs less as an example....
I'll still test that ammo for proper "function" in my gun before I just go arbitrarily trusting my very life to it.

Hmm. Man, we are way miscommunicating somehow. How about this saying it this way: If you have a reputable, big name modern defensive carry load that you've tested and know runs 100% in your gun(s) it's not worth the money to waste on testing a different reputable, big name modern defensive load to replace it just because you, or company marketing, think it will be more effective. There, we clear now?
 
Hmm. Man, we are way miscommunicating somehow. How about this saying it this way: If you have a reputable, big name modern defensive carry load that you've tested and know runs 100% in your gun(s) it's not worth the money to waste on testing a different reputable, big name modern defensive load to replace it just because you, or company marketing, think it will be more effective. There, we clear now?

Ah!
Now I see what you mean.
Sure. I agree with that.
Changing ammo just to change ammo because of some pipe dream promise of a supernatural magical new bullet in magazine ads that is supossed to be 1200000000 times better than anything else on the market is most likely just another scam.

In that case, then sure, just stick with what you already know works.
Agreed.
 
inb4 extreme shock

top_2.jpg
 
SabbathWolf,

It doesn't matter how much Winchester Ranger ammo you have. You're not buying it at MAH. :rolleyes:

I didn't say you couldn't buy it anywhere else.

W-M
 
Water-Man said:
It doesn't matter how much Winchester Ranger ammo you have. You're not buying it at MAH.

I am. And I'm not in LE and I have no special connections. I'm sure others are as well.

You were supposed to read between the lines.

Edit: And please don't quote this message. I will delete it later...
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top