Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

self defence civil lawsuite

Discussion in 'Legal' started by claytonfaulkner, Apr 10, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. claytonfaulkner

    claytonfaulkner Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2008
    Messages:
    49
    ok i was looking for any cases yall know of where someone used self defence and was either not charged with any crimes or was found innocent, but was stil sued in a civil court. ex... a many shooting someone that broke into his house and was never charged with any crimes because the shooting was in selfdefence but was sued by the family of the victum
     
  2. Bartholomew Roberts

    Bartholomew Roberts Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    14,613
    Location:
    Texas
    Search the archives here in the Legal forum. I know there are at least two cases where off-duty police officers were sued when someone broke into their home and they used lethal force to stop the intruder.

    In one case the homeowner vacuum cleaner by the intruder and the deceased's parents sued in civil court all the way to the Court of Appeals (immediately shot down at summary judgment at both the lower court and court of appeals level).

    I have looked at this before and found at least three cases. It seems like it is more common when there are some deep pockets somewhere in the background (in this case the various PDs that employed the men were also named).
     
  3. Bobarino

    Bobarino member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2003
    Messages:
    1,625
    Location:
    western Washington
    some states like WA, where i live have laws preventing such lawsuits. if the shooting was justified, the deceased criminal's (NOT victim's, the slayer is the victim) family cannot sue the slayer.

    if your state does not have such laws, it would be a good idea to contact your legislators and ask them to draft a bill to that effect.

    Bobby

    p.s.

    here's the law for WA

     
  4. claytonfaulkner

    claytonfaulkner Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2008
    Messages:
    49
    wow, i really like section 2 of that, maby if i was any better at writing i could write a letter to someone
     
  5. Flyboy

    Flyboy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,888
    Location:
    Oklahoma City, OK
    Actually, Bobarino, your law applies to the cost of defense against a criminal prosecution ("found not guilty" refers solely to criminal cases; also, it says that the State will reimburse--in civil cases, it would be the plaintiff reimbursing). claytonfaulkner is looking for something like
    Subsection B concerns situations in your home ("castle doctrine"/"make my day law"), and D covers anywhere else you have a right to be ("stand your ground law").

    All in all, a nice little section of law. But I really like Washington's as well--protects you even from the state. The only downside I can see is that it gives the prosecutor incentive to have you found guilty, and he may take that a little bit too seriously. But I think it's a good law overall.
     
  6. Bobarino

    Bobarino member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2003
    Messages:
    1,625
    Location:
    western Washington
    (1) No person in the state shall be placed in legal jeopardy of any kind whatsoever....

    civil suit is legal jeopardy.

    Bobby
     
  7. USMC 1975

    USMC 1975 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    Messages:
    147
    I believe many States have this law. I haven;t stayed current on which States have this clause in their law books, but it is sometimes included with their CCW laws.

    I would research the State you live in to see if this law maybe on the books there.

    Chris
     
  8. markk

    markk Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Messages:
    490
    Location:
    NE Florida
    Florida's recent "Castle Doctrine/Stand Your Ground" law also forbid civil suits against a self-defender...
     
  9. DutchmanDick

    DutchmanDick Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2006
    Messages:
    179
    Same with Michigan.
     
  10. F4GIB

    F4GIB Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    1,165
    Location:
    Midwest
    Minnesota has it. Section 611A.08.
     
  11. johndeeere1979

    johndeeere1979 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2008
    Messages:
    50
    West Virginia does not have it but are working hard to get it.

    check out this web site if interested www.wvcdl.org great website by a lawyer in Morgantown i belive.
     
  12. oneshooter

    oneshooter Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    1,327
    Location:
    TEXAS, by God
    Texas, God Bless Her, passed that protection in the last session. Took effect Sept.1 2007.:D

    Oneshooter
    Livin in Texas
     
  13. WayneConrad

    WayneConrad Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Messages:
    2,128
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    I have read that the legislation giving you protection from civil lawsuits is, in some states, a scarecrow; that, in those states, it takes a grand jury's "no bill" for this protection to kick in. That means that if the district attorney's office never sends your self defense shooting to the grand jury, you are still vulnerable to a civil lawsuit.

    Is this true?
     
  14. markk

    markk Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Messages:
    490
    Location:
    NE Florida
    Re: Florida

    Quoted from http://www.cfif.org/htdocs/freedomline/current/in_our_opinion/florida-self-defense-law.htm

    See bolded comments...
     
  15. Sage of Seattle

    Sage of Seattle Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2006
    Messages:
    773
    The classic case? Bernie Goetz, the so-called "subway vigilante" of New York City fame.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernhard_Goetz

    EDITED: Well, after reading it again, it seems that he was convicted of illegally posessing a pistol, but nothing else. He was sued, lost, and was ordered to pay $43 million. He filed bankruptcy and never paid apparently.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page