Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Senators who have voted to ban .30-30 ammo

Discussion in 'Activism Discussion and Planning' started by Bartholomew Roberts, Oct 29, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Bartholomew Roberts

    Bartholomew Roberts Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    14,613
    Location:
    Texas
    In 2004, Ted Kennedy stood on the floor of the Senate and demanded a ban on .30-30 hunting ammunition by name saying:

    Source: (Congressional Record, February 26, 2004, page S1634)

    The following Senators voted YES for Sen. Kennedy's proposal. The ones in bold are still in office as of 2010.

    YEAs ---34
    Akaka (D-HI)
    Bayh (D-IN) (retiring this term)
    Biden (D-DE) As VP casts tie-breaking vote in Senate
    Boxer (D-CA)
    Byrd (D-WV)
    Cantwell (D-WA)
    Carper (D-DE)
    Chafee (R-RI)
    Clinton (D-NY)
    Corzine (D-NJ)
    Dayton (D-MN)
    Dodd (D-CT) (retiring this term)
    Durbin (D-IL)
    Feingold (D-WI)
    Feinstein (D-CA)
    Graham (D-FL)
    Harkin (D-IA)
    Hollings (D-SC)
    Inouye (D-HI)
    Kennedy (D-MA)
    Kerry (D-MA)
    Kohl (D-WI)
    Lautenberg (D-NJ)
    Levin (D-MI)
    Lieberman (D-CT)
    Mikulski (D-MD)
    Murray (D-WA)
    Nelson (D-FL)
    Reed (D-RI)
    Rockefeller (D-WV)
    Sarbanes (D-MD)
    Schumer (D-NY)
    Stabenow (D-MI)
    Wyden (D-OR)

    Of the above Senators, the following are up for re-election in November and are rated as less than "safe" by Real Clear Politics (from least likely to lose to most likely to lose (clicking on link will take you to their opponents website):

    Wyden D-OR, Boxer D-CA, Murray D-WA, Feingold WI-D

    Just a reminder of all the Senators who think that banning .30-30 ammo is A-OK and who have voted to do so. By my count, that is still way too many in office. This November will be a good chance to work a little more on that list!

    Let's donate money to opponents and where we can, vote these people out of office.
     
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2010
  2. AStone

    AStone Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Messages:
    24,176
    Location:
    Far N, E coast
    Wow.

    Nice to see my current state is not on that list.
    Not registered to vote here; not sure I'll be here long.

    Nomadic is a way of life....
     
  3. o Unforgiven o

    o Unforgiven o Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2010
    Messages:
    598
    Location:
    Central FL
    They have it all wrong, they need to ban body armor, safes, armored vehicles and tanks so there will be no armor to penetrate. :rolleyes:

    Not surprised to see Graham is not still in office, us Floridians like our gun's. ;)
     
  4. Bartholomew Roberts

    Bartholomew Roberts Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    14,613
    Location:
    Texas
    Well, the job is halfway done. Now just show Nelson the door.
     
  5. justgoto

    justgoto member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2009
    Messages:
    86
    It displays how clueless these people are.
     
  6. Cesiumsponge

    Cesiumsponge Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2004
    Messages:
    2,266
    Location:
    Washington
    Another reason to vote out Murray. The polls have been going for weeks and the incumbent and challenger are literally neck-to-neck between Murray and Rossi. I suspect a lot of national focus will come down to our state as it might tip the balance of Congress.

    I do question what would happen if the race does end up being close once all the ballots are counted (our state switched to an all mail-in system so they'll take a few days to trickle in after election day). Last time Rossi ran for governor against the incumbent, he won. However the incumbent pushed two separate recounts until results from "mysteriously discovered missing ballots" tipped in her favor, then claimed victory with no more recounts, and stole the governor's office. :scrutiny:
     
  7. Zoogster

    Zoogster Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    5,096
    You have to show the weapon this cartridge was designed for in 1894!


    Winchester_Model_1894.jpg


    It was an attempt to ban virtually all rifle calibers.
    Brazil has done this under basically the same tactic.


    Nevermind that the original intent of the 2nd Amendment is completely defeated if tyranny can deploy agents with armor that can defeat the arms held by the citizenry.
     
  8. Cearbhall

    Cearbhall Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2010
    Messages:
    146
    Cesiumsponge: A Cali Bay Area newspaper just last week had an article about recounts already being planned. Maybe they know something I don't.

    Even though I have no love for Boxer's opponent, I'll be voting against Boxer.
     
  9. 71Commander

    71Commander Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Messages:
    2,336
    Location:
    Headin back to Johnson City
    Come Tuesday, that list will be reduced by one.:)
     
  10. tasco 74

    tasco 74 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    Messages:
    855
    Location:
    iowa u.s.a.
    TERM LIMITS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! this was GOVERNMENT never set up to be a CAREER.........................................
     
  11. ReadyontheRight

    ReadyontheRight Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,335
    Location:
    Minnesota - nine months of ice and snow...three mo
    Please note that gun-grabbing Mark Dayton is running for Governor of Minnesota.
     
  12. ReadyontheRight

    ReadyontheRight Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,335
    Location:
    Minnesota - nine months of ice and snow...three mo


    My Wisconsin neighbors: Please vote anti-gun Feingold OUT!

    And we promise to keep Favre (love him!/hate him!) out of a Packer uniform until his Hall of Fame induction.
     
  13. jimmyraythomason

    jimmyraythomason Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    Messages:
    7,419
    Location:
    Alabama
    I noticed the only Republican in the criminal line-up is no longer in office. Did this vote hasten his departure/removal?
     
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2010
  14. zoom6zoom

    zoom6zoom Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    Messages:
    2,908
    Location:
    Virginia
    Jimmy, Chaffee was a RINO of the worst order. He's another one who "inherited" his seat, being appointed after his father died. After losing his seat to a Democrat, he became an Independent and I believe is currently running for Governor.
     
  15. Bartholomew Roberts

    Bartholomew Roberts Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    14,613
    Location:
    Texas
    Yes, Chaffee is now running for Governor of RI in this election. He isn't in the Senate anymore; but he isn't gone either. However, he is no longer a part of the Republican party. I don't know if that was their good decision or his though. I suspect his.
     
  16. jimmyraythomason

    jimmyraythomason Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    Messages:
    7,419
    Location:
    Alabama
    I KNOW I'm not the only one to notice that they are all (except for the rino) from the same party. I guess pointing out that fact will be too political for discussion though.
     
  17. Zoogster

    Zoogster Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    5,096
    There is a trick in Congress though, seen more on well known controversial issues.
    In the Senate especially where there is only 100 total members most of them know in detail the positions of other senators. They (or more accurately their aides that do that for them) can also reference their known positions on certain topics.

    Most of them also know what issues will be voted on in a given day well in advance. The result is that many of them know who is voting for what and the likely result of the vote on many issues days before the actual vote.
    What some will do is only vote for something unpopular if it is likely to actually pass, and abstain from voting or vote in line with what their constituents won't punish them for if it has no chance of passing.

    The result is something that really would have only failed by a few votes goes into official record as failing by many more votes because of all the individuals who abstain or vote contrary to how they would have if their vote actually would have changed the outcome.

    These politicians can then cite not having voted for something they would have voted for if it was close to passing. For example a Southern Democrat won't vote for some gun control they may have if it was closer to passing and their vote was needed. As a result they take no local heat from their constituents without really



    What all of this means is that the official voting record on various issues is not always as clear is it may appear.

    For example, while I don't know to what extent that applies in this case, let us look at the numbers
    13 democrats voted nay. 63 total voted nay. If you remove the 13 you still have a solid 50 nays. Meaning they couldn't have gotten anywhere anyways.

    Republicans of course do the same thing on certain issues, voting for the more popular choice or abstaining if their vote won't make a difference to keep their record a certain way. They might take the tarnish if their vote actually will decide the outcome, but vote in the way that gives the best citable record if it won't.
    Like certain Republicans against guns as individuals may vote against gun control, unless it is on the verge of passing at which point they may vote for it.
    Instead of going down as voting for something that didn't pass anyways they only take the position unpopular with their party if their individual vote will decide the outcome. (Unless the thing that won't pass is important enough to their constituents to have on their record for re-election as having voted for.)



    So you can only judge the politicians and hold them accountable by what they have done, but keep individual votes in context. They often don't tell the whole story.
    If word got out that X and Y, people known to have a staunch position on an issue were changing their positions, and Z was changing their position because X agreed to vote the way Z wanted on another piece of legislation in a private meeting if Z votes how they want, then an additional large number of individuals can instantly change their votes as a block when they see the issue will actually be close enough to be decided by their votes.

    How certain individuals vote can change dramatically if their vote will actually be a deciding factor.
     
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2010
  18. jimmyraythomason

    jimmyraythomason Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    Messages:
    7,419
    Location:
    Alabama
    Regardless of how they play the game ,it is only their votes they actually cast that matter.
     
  19. augustino

    augustino member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    272
    Idiots!!!!

    Guns, like any other TOOLS are precisely that, a TOOL.
    Now take for instance the ball peen hammer. Fantastic TOOL in the hands of many a craftsmen. But the ball peen hammer is also quite popular among some very well known motorcycle enthusiasts. Well actually a motorcycle gang. They wear the ball peen hammer through their belts and use it as a fierce WEAPON. And with this WEAPON they have killed and maimed many in fights and brutal attacks.
    So with the brightest and the best of the best serving as our elected officials I'm quite surprised that the ball peen hammer hasn't yet been banned! In fact I suggest that Americans run out and buy any/all ball peen hammers because based on their track record our elected officials may soon ban this TOOL uhhh I mean WEAPON since it's responsible for so much pain, suffering and death.
    I am so sick & tired of illogical thinkers trying to cure the cold by killing off the people that I can't help but feel these folks are just plain crazy. The ball peen doesn't do the crime the person does. The gun doesn't shoot people the criminal that our system let's lose time after time again and again is the one responsible for doing the crime. If they didn't have this 30 30 they would go with the 7.63X39 or the 40 caliber or whatever it was they culd get their hands on.
     
  20. ljnowell

    ljnowell Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2008
    Messages:
    6,201
    Location:
    The Peoples Republic of IL
    Regardless of why they voted that way, they did. Anyone that owns a gun and votes for those people doesnt deserve to own that gun. I'll take all the heat anyone wants to heap on me for saying that, because its true.
     
  21. robertbartsc

    robertbartsc Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2010
    Messages:
    87
    Chuck Schumer from NY is on the ballot November 2nd.
     
  22. ilmonster

    ilmonster Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    552
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    As of last night, Feingold...gone!
     
  23. Bartholomew Roberts

    Bartholomew Roberts Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    14,613
    Location:
    Texas
    Yup, Feingold is gone. We are standing by to see if Murray gets the boot. It appears to be really close though and it could be months before we know. Looks like it will be 2016 before we get another chance at Wyden and Boxer.
     
  24. ColdChili

    ColdChili Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2007
    Messages:
    98
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Hey ReadyontheRight, you better keep your promise:

     
  25. Kernel

    Kernel Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2003
    Messages:
    2,005
    Location:
    77 Square Miles Surrounded by Reality (Madison), W
    Next up: Kohl :barf: :barf: :barf: :fire:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page