Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Shooting to kill "exceeded the right to self defence"

Discussion in 'Legal' started by BigRugerLover, Feb 22, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BigRugerLover

    BigRugerLover Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2008
    Messages:
    63
    Location:
    Ozarks
    And we thought we had it bad in the US. This is what the CIA guy (Davis) is dealing with in Pakistan:

    Punjab Law Minister Rana Sanaullah says the weapon carried by Haider wasn't loaded and thus Davis has no right to claim self-defense.

    The Lahore Police Chief Aslam Tarin in a news conference said...Davis exceeded the right to self-defense by shooting to kill.

    The police report said "there was not a single bullet loaded in the chambers of either of the two slain people -- Faizan Haider and Fahim Shamshaad. Rather all bullets were in magazines."

    Reuters, Feb 22, 2011, "Factbox: What did CIA contractor Davis do in Pakistan's Lahore"

    +BRL
     
  2. Cosmoline

    Cosmoline Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    23,648
    Location:
    Los Anchorage
    It's an unusual situation, but I have no doubt that any American in a foreign nation will face similar levels of hostility and perverted justice in a self defense killing, from Pakistan to Russia to the UK. It's something to bear in mind. Folks *HATE* Americans and think we're all a bunch of trigger-happy cowboys. Stay out of trouble, and stay out of Pakistan.
     
  3. Old Fuff

    Old Fuff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    23,908
    Location:
    Arizona
    I suspect that as we withdraw our military - and money - this sort of thing will happen again. Clearly Mr. Davis had no opportunity to inspect the chambers carried in weapons being used by those that were attacking him. One can only wonder what the finding would have been if it had been a local policeman rather then Davis... :fire:

    Pakistan loves our money much more then they do us... perhaps a substantial bribe might be necessary, or maybe one of those drones might fly off course. :evil:
     
  4. USAF_Vet

    USAF_Vet Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2011
    Messages:
    5,773
    Location:
    Hastings, Michigan
    Apparently, one must be shot at first before responding in kind. Lame. Of course, they could have just doctored the evidence to make Davis look guilty.
     
  5. Vermonter

    Vermonter Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    416
    Shoot to stop
     
  6. withdrawn34

    withdrawn34 Member.

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2008
    Messages:
    529
    Thank God I had the good fortune to be born and raised in this country.
     
  7. Shadow 7D

    Shadow 7D Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2008
    Messages:
    7,005
    Location:
    Frozen North
    Hmm
    An EVEN bigger issue is, say diplomatic immunity, his was not waived and he was INTERROGATED after invoking it, and DEIGNED contact with the embassy (something that is guaranteed everybody, everywhere under treaties)

    So we know that Pakistan isn't abiding the law laid out and signed by them, I say just cut the place off and let the militants play havoc there, convince them that Pakis are easy targets, then India invades to 'secure nuclear weapons from possible theft'
    Or al queda does get their hands on nukes (which they were working with Pakistans 'Hero' to get)

    So once the government realizes that playing the same old card just gets them thrown to the lions, maybe the will remember what comes with the millions of dollars and hundreds of American lives.

    Proper course, if the believe him to be a spy is to take him to the nearest airport and eject him. Or say take him to the Afghanistan boarder and do the same....
     
  8. GambJoe

    GambJoe Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2010
    Messages:
    226
    Location:
    Richmond TX
    I'll ask the obvious.

    What if this was a Pakistani in the US?
     
  9. GRIZ22

    GRIZ22 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    5,037
    An EVEN bigger issue is, say diplomatic immunity,

    What did CIA contractor Davis do in Pakistan's Lahore"

    This guy is a CIA contractor and wouldn't have diplomatic immunity.
     
  10. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    33,736
    Location:
    Central PA
    Yes, it is good to live where the law generally recognizes reasonable justifications for self-defense, and where justice is rarely so blatantly skewed by politics.
     
  11. rbernie
    • Contributing Member

    rbernie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    20,557
    Location:
    Norra Texas
    Sadly, this discussion is more about politics than the actual legal self defense statutes in Pakistan. If anyone can convince me that they can offer material and substantive content to this thread, then I will reopen it. Until then, it's closed as off topic.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page