Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Short barrel + long muzzle brake?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by eastwood44mag, Jul 22, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. eastwood44mag

    eastwood44mag Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2005
    Messages:
    1,027
    Why?

    I see AR's advertised with a 13 inch barrel and a 3 inch muzzle brake, or some other such dimensions, but I can't figure out the logic. A short barrel does not perform as accurately, so aside from the notion that one has a short barrel without needing a tax stamp, is there any reason to do so?

    I'm not trying to be a jerk, but I really don't understand, and I would like someone to explain it to me. Thanks.
     
  2. jerkface11

    jerkface11 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2005
    Messages:
    5,498
    Location:
    Arkansas
    The 13" barrel is lighter and easier handling than a 16" barrel even with the 3" of brake on the end since the brake is lighter than 3" of barrel would be. Of course it still looks dorky.
     
  3. miko

    miko Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2005
    Messages:
    495
    I actually saw one like that at the range - though it was 11.5 barrel" + 4.5 brake"
    It also sported a bipod and a 4x scope - though with a drop of about 2" at 25 yards I could hardly see it as a long-range weapon, not even talking about the low energy.
    I could not see it as a short-range one either, with all the extra weight and muzzle blast and scope obscuring the view... :rolleyes:

    On the other hand, as a toy it was great fun - at least the owner seemed to have a good time with it.

    miko
     
  4. quicktime

    quicktime Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Messages:
    130
    Location:
    Currently in Kabul Afghanistan but usually Colorad
    The short barreled AR is a great home defense weapon that is overlooked quite frequently. It is easier for most people to shoot than a pistol and with the extra sight radius it is usually more accurate. I agree that a short barrel is not the way to go for a varmint rig but to each his own.
     
  5. MisterPX

    MisterPX Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    759
    Location:
    Amerika's Doyleland
    Quicktime, you missed the point of his post. A 16" barrel, or a 11.5" barrel with 5.5" muzzle break is the same lenght.

    Anyhow, it's generally tthwe easy way to get a BR type look without going NFA. SOme 11.5's with teh 5.5 moderators are meant to duplicate the XM177 type rifle.
     
  6. BeJaRa

    BeJaRa Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2006
    Messages:
    195
    Location:
    Florida
    I think it is a bit backwards as well. I know some of you guys say it is a weight thing, but that couple inches of barrel weights alot less than most of the "options" most guys put on those carbines. I love a good AR but less than 16" barrel you are giving up too much velocity and energy for my taste. Plus AR's cost too much money to basically make it a 100 yrd or less gun by going with short barrel. To each thier own, but that is my $0.02
     
  7. Gunfixr

    Gunfixr Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2007
    Messages:
    84
    Location:
    East Coast, USA
    A lot of people think they look more cool, as the long section of barrel past the front sight base kinda looks dorky. But you are right, the overall is the same. When I was younger I thought this as well, and had one with a long flashider and short barrel, but have gotten away from that now. Looks aside, the 5.56mm round needs a certain amount of velocity to have the terminal effects it was designed for. It has been established that barrels below 16" have lost enough velocity to eliminate most of these effects. Thus, the next rifle I build will have a full 16" barrel and relatively short flashider.
     
  8. silverlance

    silverlance Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    2,142
    Location:
    In my Foxhole
    i respectfully disagree.

    my ideal AR15 woudl have a 14.5" chrome lined fluted barrel or m4 profile lightweight barrel with an A2 flashhider permanently attached.

    upper would be flat top, foward assist, with a carbine length HG rail and fixed front sight post.

    stock would be m4 shorty fixed stock, grip would be an israel ISF pistol grip with 2 AA in the grip. optic would be eotech.
     
  9. W.E.G.

    W.E.G. Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    7,392
    Location:
    all over Virginia
    I have never seen a cite to a authoritative article on why the military used the long brake/flash-hider on the shorty "commando" model M16's.

    But, my theory is that the "dorky" muzzle-extension device was necessary for two reasons. First the rifle probably wouldn't reliably cycle without some sort sort of barrel extension (gas pressure boost); and second, the fireball on those shorty guns was unacceptable for combat conditions. Surely the long brake mitigated the flashbulb effect some. One thing is for sure, the military didn't adopt it to comply with GCA '68.

    I disagree that the shortness of the barrel in any way reduces accuracy. This myth has been disproven time and time again.

    I do agree that the short barrel produces lower velocity than a longer barrel. To what degree this fact may be relevant depends on the intended application of the weapon. I always assumed that anybody toting an SBR was not planning on hunting prarie dogs, or entering any long-range benchrest tournaments.

    The 10.5" and 11.5" barrels on an AR-type rifle make the most sense when combined with an actual sound suppressor. There, you have no muzzle flash whatsoever, and a sound level that is a bit less than a .22 long rifle. Again, whether such a weapon is of any practical use, will depend on the needs of the owner. I don't think anything wants to be on the receiving end of that at wall-to-wall carpet distances.
     

    Attached Files:

  10. Fred Fuller

    Fred Fuller Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2004
    Messages:
    21,221
    Location:
    AL, NC
    The muzzle attachment on the XM177 and the XM177E1 acted as both a sound moderator and a flash suppressor. It was that 'look' which inspired lotso folk who wanted kewl-looking AR carbines to get short barrels with permanently attached long flash hiders so they could have lookalikes.

    Since there's no ballistic advantage to 6" of pipe hanging on a 10" barrel, I personally see no use in it. But some folks had rather garner kewl points than ballistic efficiency, more power to them.

    lpl/nc
     
  11. MudPuppy

    MudPuppy Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    1,529
    Location:
    UK and Texas
    I sort of feel the same way, but losing some weight on the barrel is appealing (my young son shoot it a bit and it's a bit heavy out there for him). However, if the law says its gotta be 16in anyway, I might as well be getting all the velocity I can from it...obviously on the fence.

    However, I think a lot of people dismiss stuff they think of as "goofy", when it really is up to the individual (go figure). As long as the equipment is in the "required performance envelope", it comes down to opinions. We all got 'em, sometimes a bunch of us share similar ones, but thank God for individualism, else it'd be a truly boring world.

    And, in my opinion, the XM-177 does look cool.
     
  12. MisterPX

    MisterPX Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    759
    Location:
    Amerika's Doyleland
    I think they look better without the moderator;)
    [​IMG]
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page