Short barrels and red dots

[Gunner Mike]

Is a 4" revolver inherently less accurate than a 8"? I realize that velocity is not up to par, but is it less accurate? With iron sights, I also realize that sight radius may be the problem.

Would a red dot overcome the barrel difference, notwithstanding the velocity?

As usual, any comments are appreciated.

 

[ArmedBear]

Is a 4" revolver inherently less accurate than a 8"?

No. In fact, it will probably be less sensitive to different ammo and changes in your grip than a longer one (not an issue with a .22LR, but a big one with a .44 Magnum). The recoil and torque of heavy loads in long barrels have a lot of effect on where the bullet hits.

Red dots don't know about sight radius, so a red dot would be an equalizer if sights are presenting a problem.

That said, I find a shorter revolver to be easier to shoot with irons than a longer one, since I don't have to try so hard to force my eyes to focus on the front sight like I do with a long one. I have a peep sight on a 10 1/2" .44 Magnum that also eliminates this probem.

To comment any more, I'd have to know what you're asking about with more detail.

 

[BullfrogKen]

No, and 4 inches isn't exactly what I'd call short. It's a common, "standard" if you will, length.


6 inches is getting out there, and 8 inches is pretty long to me and my shooting style.

 

[Gunner Mike]

You guys are confirming what I already thought. Just wanted second opinions.

I just got a Warne Maxima Weaver base for $20 unopened. When I bought my 686, I wanted an "all-rounder" and I've been toying with the idea of using it for hunting. This opened the door.

Any other thoughts?

 

[Gunner Mike]

BTW, nice vests, Ken. Very good idea. Look nice, with another reason. Like it a lot.

Would look nice with my Kangol.