Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Shot a 1911 for the first time: some observations

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by NoirFan, Aug 4, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. NoirFan

    NoirFan Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2006
    Messages:
    525
    Hello,

    A courteous Englishman shooting a couple lanes down from me let me try out his Para Ordnance 1911 on Saturday. I have read a lot about the 1911 pattern on these forums and I was excited to see if it lived up to all that has been typed about it.

    1) Recoil: Very pleasant. The only other .45's I have shot were plastic framed guns from Beretta and Taurus, which led me to anticipate a lot of muzzle jump from the 1911. Not so. You can tell there is power in the shot but the feel of the recoil is very smooth and does not seem to move the gun off target very much. It is nothing like the sharp blast of the .357 magnum I am used to.

    2) Trigger: Not bad. I was a little disappointed after having read glowing accolades of the 1911 trigger on this and other forums. I found it to be pretty good, but not a vast improvement over the SA on a Sig 220, for example.

    3) Accuracy: Very good. I shot touching holes at 10 yards with no prior practice and I am sure this gun could have shot accurately longer distances with no problems.

    4) Pointability: Mediocre. I do not find the 1911 to be a natural pointer, forum opinions aside. I kept pointing it into the ground and then having to adjust upward before firing. More trigger time might improve this.

    5) Reliability: Can't really speak to this, as I shot only a few rounds out it. It did not jam during the 5 minutes I was shooting it, which is pretty good right? :)

    6) Overall feel: Not bad. The pistol sits comfortably in my hand; the only gripe I have is the beavertail, which I am not used to. I kept feeling like I was holding the gun too low on the grip.

    Based on my experience the 1911 is a very fun gun to shoot. Would I buy one? Not at this time, but I can now see why the pistol has such a large following.
     
  2. Jolly Rogers

    Jolly Rogers Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    620
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    Which Para was it if you noticed?
    Joe
     
  3. Storm

    Storm Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,358
    Location:
    Georgia
    A good 1911 trigger should be much, much better than a SIG 220 SA trigger. Don't get me wrong, I very much like the SIG DA/SA pull, especially on the 220, but a good 1911 should be more like a fine revolver SA trigger.
     
  4. Eric F

    Eric F Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Messages:
    2,934
    wait until you get hold of a sub 2 pound trigger! Total adiction!
     
  5. Black Majik

    Black Majik Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2003
    Messages:
    5,031
    Location:
    Orange County, California
    wait until you try something other than Para Ordnance. Total addiction! ;)
     
  6. JesseL

    JesseL Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2004
    Messages:
    2,492
    Location:
    Prescott, AZ
    Did you happen to notice if the pistol had a flat or arched mainspring housing?

    The Army noticed the same problem you did on the M1911 (which had a flat mainspring housing) and the arched housing of the M1911A1 was created to correct this.
     
  7. Rustynuts

    Rustynuts Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    730
    Depending on the Para, it may not have been a "true" 1911. Could have been double stack mag or have the LDA trigger. Try a US make 1911, Para is Canadian. Not that there's anything wrong with that!
     
  8. combatantr2

    combatantr2 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Messages:
    251
    [Try a US make 1911, Para is Canadian. Not that there's anything wrong with that!] :rolleyes:
     
  9. MICHAEL T

    MICHAEL T Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2004
    Messages:
    6,011
    Location:
    outback Kentucky
    Try a real 1911 Para isn't a 1911 except in looks
     
  10. JesseL

    JesseL Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2004
    Messages:
    2,492
    Location:
    Prescott, AZ
    Para-Ordnance does make single-stack, single-action 1911 style pistols that are just as much a 'real' 1911 as any Kimber, Wilson, Taurus, SIG, commercial Colt, etc.

    If you want to be really picky/snobbish/precise/pedantic; if it's not a US Government marked, pre-1924 pistol; it's not a real M1911.
     
  11. Eric F

    Eric F Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Messages:
    2,934
    Not a comment to you but rather any one with this mentality, If it says 1911 any where on the gun or in printed material by the manufacturer then its a 1911. Companies can call it what ever they want.

    ARGG! I hate word games! So what if I have one made in 1912 and it was not marked US Government then what is it? What about the origional 38 automatics/ 38 supers what are they then?..........early phasers?
     
  12. JesseL

    JesseL Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2004
    Messages:
    2,492
    Location:
    Prescott, AZ
    I believe that pistol would be properly called a "Colt Government Model Automatic .38 Super".

    I love word games, but I appreciate them for the silly games they usually are. Pointless pedantry is my personal pet perversion :evil:. I try to resist inflicting it on others.

    To this day AFAIK, the only pistol that Colt has called a 1911 in their own nomenclature is their WWI Reproduction.
     
  13. Eightball

    Eightball Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    Messages:
    4,257
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    Wait till you mess with one that's a major brand name (i.e. not P.O.), and/or one that's been to a smith for the trigger. It's day and night.
    There's the culprit. If you're primarily used to a .357 grip, depending on what make/model, what grip points "straight" on that revolver could well make a 1911 point "down."

    Increase trigger time behind it, you'll love 'em.
     
  14. mtngunr

    mtngunr Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2008
    Messages:
    458
    Location:
    SEUS
    English is English, definitions are definitions, and they exist to prevent confusion....a ParaOrd might be a 1911-inspired gun, but (especially if hi-cap), the connection is fading...even more so the LDA....just because it looks like a 1911A1, doesn't make it one...even less so a 1911-period....
     
  15. NoirFan

    NoirFan Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2006
    Messages:
    525
    Hello,

    It was most definitely a single-action, single-stack pistol. After looking at Para Ordnance's website I am sure it was not an LDA. However I don't know the specific model.

    I'm sorry, I don't know what a mainspring housing is, much less whether it was flat or arched!

    I think the next step is to rent out a Springfield G.I. and see how it compares.
     
  16. Beagle-zebub

    Beagle-zebub Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,482
    Location:
    Moscow, Russia
    In this picture, if you look as the rear end of the pistol's grip, you will see that below where the beaver-tail is, sits that checkered hump, which makes up the rest of the grip's rear face.

    standard.gif

    That's the arched version of the 1911 mainspring housing. The flat version is just, well, flat.
     
  17. NGIB

    NGIB Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    885
    Location:
    Hinesville, GA
    IMHO, my Para LTC (Commander-sized) is as much of a "1911" as my Springer Loaded. They point and shoot exactly the same and the triggers are very comparable.

    On the other hand my P16 double-stack with LDA trigger looks like a 1911 but certainly isn't...
     
  18. NoirFan

    NoirFan Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2006
    Messages:
    525
    Ah, so mainspring housing = backstrap! As I remember it was flat, but I can't be sure.
     
  19. Fozzy_Bear

    Fozzy_Bear Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2008
    Messages:
    91
    Location:
    Virginia
    yeah.

    the 1911 has a channel where the backstrap would be and in that notch the Main Spring housing is mounted. they are either flat (sitting flush with the rest of the grip/frame, or Arched, as in the pic above)

    You can probably imagine that the arched design would push the bottom of the grip away from your hand, thus tipping the end of the barrel up (since the top of the grip would not move in relation to your hand.)
     
  20. rduckwor

    rduckwor Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    Messages:
    428
    I have a SIG P226 and much prefer the trigger in my SA SIG GSR 1911. The SA trigger take-up distance on my 226 drives me nuts (Yes I know I could have it worked on.) while the 1911 trigger has absolutely no slack in it. It breaks like the proverbial "glass rod". Never shot a Para, but that does not sound like the typical 1911 trigger.

    RMD
     
  21. Mongrel

    Mongrel Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    238
    Re: Para Ordnance triggers...

    Anyone who has shot a "working man's" 1911 (under $800 or so) has commented on how good the trigger on my Para is. Now, mine is a 1992 model so maybe something's changed but it needed to be said none the less.

    Let's keep it in perspective: Paras at that price level ($600-$700) are not meant to compete with $1200 to $1500 hand tuned guns.
     
  22. The Lone Haranguer

    The Lone Haranguer Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    11,717
    Location:
    Johnson City, TN
    Agreed. Even in lighter guns the .45 has a "push" recoil rather than a "snap," (think .40 S&W), which I find more pleasant to shoot.

    Triggers on 1911s can be variable. Perhaps another specimen might do better. I do think that if it doesn't have a reasonably crisp and light trigger pull, it has little advantage over the "short stroke" DAO.

    Although this partly contradicts the statements above, the trigger has quite a bit to do with this. If the one you shot was a full-size five-inch barrel, the sight radius is a little longer.

    This is very subjective. Most newer 1911s come with a flat mainspring housing (which forms the grip backstrap) and a long trigger. One set up in the 1911A1 configuration (arched housing and short trigger) might point better for you. I find the flat/long to be very natural pointing, myself.

    That is better than the 1911s I've had. :rolleyes: ;)

    The idea of the beavertail is to hold it higher, as well as reduce the abrasion, gouging and/or hammer bite that often plagues the standard grip safety.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page