Shoving the barrel into an attacker????

Status
Not open for further replies.
In GA, forced entry equals home invasion, and home invasion equals automatic justification of lethal force.
Unless the GA castle doctrine is very different from the various castle doctrine laws I've looked at, it equals no such thing.

Castle doctrine laws provide the presumption of innocence if the criteria are met. It doesn't mean you're automatically justified, it just means that you don't have to prove you're innocent as you would normally have to do after shooting someone. It means that the state has to presume you're innocent unless there is evidence to suggest otherwise. If you provide that evidence or provide good reason for the responding LEOs to suspect that it wasn't self-defense or that you broke other laws, then castle doctrine won't mean much at all.

And it provides absolutely no protection against the penalties associated with other laws. So if you break another law (say tampering with evidence at the scene of a felony crime) the castle doctrine won't help you in the least.
 
Mod, I'm sorry, I am thus far missing your point. Are you agreeing? Or are you castigating me for having posted about Colorado law? Do you wish me to remove my post?
Neither. I'm repeating the point that JohnKSa made that in neither GA or CO, "it equals no such thing."

A much better understanding of what "Castle Doctrine" laws DO is required.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top