Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Sig P227; face palm for advertising

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Yo Mama, Aug 28, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Yo Mama

    Yo Mama Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,789
    "Take hold of the .45acp, high capacity P227 and decide for yourself."-Sept 2013 American Rifleman magazine ad

    So what is this high capacity that Sig speaks of?:
    10+1 for flush magazines
    14+1 for extended

    I'm starting to notice a trend and it's bothering me. So my thought is now 10-14 rounds is high capacity? Seriously? :banghead::banghead::banghead:

    Hey Sig, I love ya, but this needs to be changed to, "NORMAL" capacity.

    Rant over.
     
  2. beeenbag

    beeenbag Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,005
    Location:
    Grayson, Ky
    I believe it is just a play on words emphasizing a greater capacity 45 being introduced, but yeah definatly a bad choice of words.
     
  3. Telekinesis

    Telekinesis Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,412
    Location:
    Birmingham, Alabama
    I think they were going for "a higher capacity version of the 220" or something to that effect. Poor choice of words on their part, but I think I see what they were trying to do.
     
  4. Yo Mama

    Yo Mama Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,789
    I hear you both, and understand it may be so.

    I'm just thinking that's all we need is for 10-14 rounds to start being the standard for high capacity.
     
  5. CPshooter

    CPshooter Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,420
    For .45acp, I consider that to be "high capacity." The term is relative to what type of ammo is being used, obviously.
     
  6. BILLG

    BILLG Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    102
    Location:
    Ohio
    If this is all you have to worry about you are extremely lucky.
     
  7. allaroundhunter

    allaroundhunter Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2011
    Messages:
    3,988
    Location:
    Southeast Texas
    For .45 ACP it kinda is.
     
  8. HorseSoldier

    HorseSoldier Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2006
    Messages:
    5,297
    Location:
    Anchorage, AK
    Agreed. Sometimes words just mean what they mean unless you really try to overthink it.
     
  9. ku4hx

    ku4hx Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2009
    Messages:
    2,794
    Marketing hype. Whatever the marketing department feels will give them an edge in getting noticed. As Hollywood shows us every day, bad publicity is better than no publicity.
     
  10. HOOfan_1

    HOOfan_1 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Messages:
    4,698
    Location:
    Virginia
    I for one am getting tired of the gun community letting the antis dictate how we talk amongst ourselves.

    Why should we be so afraid of the term "high capacity"? Because the antis will try to use it against us? WHO CARES? If we start walking on eggshells around each other, then the antis are winning.
     
  11. ATLDave

    ATLDave Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2011
    Messages:
    3,130
    When the first generations of "wondernines" came out, those with double-stack mags were often described as "high-capacity." It's not a derogatory term.
     
  12. PedalBiker

    PedalBiker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    Messages:
    536
    Location:
    Colorado
    I wish Nissan had considered a "High Capacity" gas tank on my truck. It really stinks having a 350 mile rage on an off road vehicle. Even a 25-30% boost would be really nice.

    Only a idiot will give you credit for making a low capacity product. Thanks to our low capacity politicians Colorado is rapidly approaching California in a number of key quality of life metrics.
     
  13. 918v

    918v Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    3,931
    I want a X5 version of that.
     
  14. Quick Shot xMLx

    Quick Shot xMLx Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2011
    Messages:
    197
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    I think they dropped the ball by not including a 14rd extended mag with the gun. The biggest draw of the gun is that 14rd mag. Not including one with the gun reduces the "hype" on it, especially when they don't even have the 14rd one up for sale yet(or sold out idk).

    Disregarding the potential anti-gun angle lets face it, anything with more than 10rds of .45 is pretty much "high capacity."
     
  15. Hanzo581

    Hanzo581 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    1,444
    Location:
    Chesapeake, Virginia
    14+1 in a .45 is high capacity when compared to other 45s. Don't see the issue here. And just a quick advertising tip, never use the word "normal" in something trying to sell your product.
     
  16. fastbolt

    fastbolt Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,588
    Location:
    Within the lightning
    Words mean things ... but not always what some people may think they mean. ;)

    For Sig, 7-rd capacity, and then 8-rd capacity, for their .45 ACP pistols has always been normal.

    The newest 10-rd double stack version would then be considered high capacity, if you're comparing them to the older design/capacities. They seem to think of it that way, and it's their product to shill.

    I remember when the Browning HP & S&W M59 were commonly called hi-cap guns. Why? Probably because they were hi-cap guns compared to 1911's & M39's. ;) Not hard to understand. (This was in the 70's & 80's, BTW, before legislation ever dreamed about addressing magazine capacity.)

    The canceled JCP military pistol program ('05-'06) listed a standard capacity for the then-proposed JCP .45 as no less than 10 rounds, and then stated high capacity magazines be available. Coincidentally enough, some commercial spin-off's of pistols designed at that time (with those program specs in mind) have given us 10-rd standard and 14-rd hi-cap mags. Imagine that. ;)

    http://www.cbd-net.com/index.php/search/show/893436 (but this older link didn't list specificity of mag capacity of either mag spec)

    Now, if you want to think of the HGK USP 45 and Glock G21 as having "standard" capacity magazines because they were able to be built around mag bodies which held more than 10-rds, go right ahead.

    Doesn't mean the rest of the handgun world is going to think of them as the established "bar" of what standard & hi-cap .45 mags ought to be, though.

    As a long time owner & user of 1911's, beginning back when 7-rd was the only mag available, and then carrying either a 4566TSW (8-rd mag) or a 4513TSW (7-rd mag) as issued weapons ... I tend to think of my M&P 45, with its 10-rd standard mag, as "hi-cap".

    But that's just me. ;)
     
  17. Eldraque

    Eldraque Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2013
    Messages:
    63
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    I heard one round if .45 can kill 3 men, so id say having 10 rounds of .45 is like a WMD
     
  18. jmr40

    jmr40 Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    9,898
    Considering 45's have traditionally held 7 rounds 10 or 14 rounds would certainly rate as a hi cap 45 to me.
     
  19. beatledog7

    beatledog7 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    5,093
    Location:
    Tidewater
    I agree that 14 is more than many other .45s, but using "high-capacity" would seem unwise at best in an age in which guns with characteristic are targeted for extinction by antis.

    Why not just say "10-round or 14-round" magazine? A serious comparative .45 shopper will understand what that means.
     
  20. HOOfan_1

    HOOfan_1 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Messages:
    4,698
    Location:
    Virginia
    You mean...tuck tail and hide in a corner?
     
  21. batex

    batex Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2006
    Messages:
    224
    +1 !

    Also, there are probably more important things to rant about like our politicians lying to us daily regarding gun owners, concealed carry, crime statistics, etc. Let's direct our energy where it matters...
     
  22. 460Shooter

    460Shooter Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2011
    Messages:
    5,553
    Location:
    A cabin in the woods, on the way to nothing.
    Hype for sure, but I'm still interested. I may buy one next year if they come out with a stainless model.
     
  23. beatledog7

    beatledog7 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    5,093
    Location:
    Tidewater
    HOOfan_1,

    It's not tucking tail--it's just smart business. Antis love to use terminology that gets their supporters excited and makes pro-2A folks look (to these supporters) like bloodthirsty killers. High capacity is not a 2A term--it's anti-2A term. Like it or not, they've co-opted it.

    Supporters of 2A do ourselves no favors by describing our equipment using the terms (such as assault rifle, and high capacity magazine) the antis use against us. And we don't need to; we can simply use precise terms. That's why 10-round or 14-round is a better choice than high capacity.
     
  24. HOOfan_1

    HOOfan_1 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Messages:
    4,698
    Location:
    Virginia
    That's like saying the car manufacturers shouldn't advertise their cars has having "high performance engines" or "high fuel efficiency".

    Just because the antis think they can try to use it against us, doesn't mean they can....and if we shy away from using the terms, all we are doing is showing that we are afraid of those terms as well....

    It is an irrational fear. I would like to think that is what sets us apart from the antis...we don't cater to irrational fears.
     
  25. beatledog7

    beatledog7 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    5,093
    Location:
    Tidewater
    Not at all the same. There's no anti-car group out there preaching against those characteristics and just waiting to throw then back at that car maker.

    They can, and they do, regularly.

    It's not fear driven; it's simply smart. If I choose not to put my head in a lion's mouth, would you say that it's only because I'm afraid of his jaws and teeth? Well, if I am, it's perfectly sensible that I should be, given the kind of damage I know they can do.

    It is completely rational not to play to the perceived strength of your opposition, in effect, giving him the exact kind of ammo he needs for his gun. That's what we do if we needlessly use their politically-loaded language. They treat it irrationally, not us. But why give them the chance?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page