Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Sig P228 and Sig P229

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by valor1, Jul 22, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. valor1

    valor1 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2004
    Messages:
    385
    I believe the P229 replaced the P228. Is there any difference between the two models? Which is better in terms of overall durability, reliability and accuracy? Any inputs? Thanks
     
  2. dogtown tom

    dogtown tom Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,301
    Location:
    Plano, Texas
    228 had a stamped steel slide, 229 has a milled stainless slide.

    Many Sig fans believe the 228 balanced better due to it's lighter weight.

    Visit here for better info:
    http://sigforum.com/eve





    .
     
  3. wojownik

    wojownik Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,852
    As noted the p228 is stamped slide, while the p229 is milled. As such the two pistols have a slightly different balance to them. Also the p229 is available in 9mm, .40 and .357 Sig.
     
  4. CWL

    CWL Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    6,505
    Wasn't the P229 originally designed for .40SW and used the extra weight for recoil control (.357Sig came later)? It was also a USA-specific design.
     
  5. wojownik

    wojownik Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,852
    Yep - the heavier milled slide was intended to accomodate the .357/.40 caliber. Which makes it a bit overbuilt for 9mm, which is a good thing, IMHO. Well designed, tough pistol.
     
  6. Ala Dan

    Ala Dan Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,879
    Location:
    Home Of The First Capitol Of The Confederate State
    The SIG P228 chambered only for the 9m/m; but as dogtown tom
    eluded too; the P228 balances a lot better~! My 1990 P228 is a West
    German model. ;) :D
     
  7. LancerMW

    LancerMW Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    Messages:
    391
    I have had both, both where great personally i liked the 228 more
     
  8. valor1

    valor1 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2004
    Messages:
    385
    Is it correct to assume that since the P229 is originally designed for the .40, it is way overbuilt for the 9mm? Consequently, it is more durable than the P228 which takes only the 9mm?
     
  9. 9mmepiphany

    9mmepiphany Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    18,694
    Location:
    northern california
    are you asking if it's more durable because of the stainless construction or more durable because the slide is heavier?

    the slide of the 9mm 229 is actually lighter than the slide of the .40 or 357 versions
     
  10. valor1

    valor1 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2004
    Messages:
    385
    durable in terms of tenacity or strength. let's say if a slide is weaker, it will digest only 10,000 rounds. If it's stronger, it will take 20,000 rounds.
     
  11. 9mmepiphany

    9mmepiphany Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    18,694
    Location:
    northern california
    it's hard to say as the 9mm doesn't use the same slide as the .40

    i understand that the stainless slide is harder on the alloy frame than the fold slide was
     
  12. RonAMOK

    RonAMOK Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    32
    Location:
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Had both still have the 229. I preferred it’s balance.
     
  13. dogtown tom

    dogtown tom Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,301
    Location:
    Plano, Texas
    As to durability.........

    Whether the slide is stamped steel, cast or milled may not really matter except for cosmetics.

    The slide will probaby be the least likely part to fail on an semi automatic pistol. I think after many thousands of rounds you may need to replace springs, extractors and other small parts. That is expected on any well used piece of machinery.

    Both the 228 & 229 would be considered "durable" handguns. The 228 is also US military issue as the M11.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page