Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Size Comparison, Bersa T380CC vs Kel-Tec P-3AT (warning pic heavy)

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by ZeSpectre, Oct 23, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ZeSpectre

    ZeSpectre Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    5,503
    Location:
    Deep in the valley
    Bought myself a brand new Bersa Thunder 380 "Concealed Carry" model.

    Thought I'd post a few pics to show you the size in relation to the Kel-Tec P-3AT (with the +1 round mag extension).

    "Slide by Slide"
    Ruler used to make sure the longest part of each firearm lined up.
    [​IMG]


    "Does my butt look fat?"
    [​IMG]

    Grip length comparison
    [​IMG]

    Kel-Tec on it's rug (note it just fits with the +1 Mag extension)

    [​IMG]

    Bersa on the Kel-Tec Rug
    I think this gives the most accurate impression of the true size difference, about 1/2 inch in either direction.
    [​IMG]

    Kel-Tec sitting on the Bersa

    [​IMG]

    And just for kicks, the Bersa sitting on a CZ-82
    [​IMG]


    What I've noticed is that these photos make the Bersa look positively HUGE (especially in comparison to the Kel-Tec). Seriously it's not THAT much bigger though it is about twice as heavy.

    Initial impression of the Bersa is that it feels extremely solid and well manufactured. With the fixed barrel I expect accuracy to be good.

    PRO-
    It also fits my hand very well.
    Disassembly is extremely simple (parallel to the CZ-82)

    CON-
    The safety lever just about requires a pair of pliers to move, it is STIFF! Hopefully that will break in with time/use.
    (EDIT: I really only expect to use the "safety" as a decocker, I'm a lefty)
    It has a Magazine disconnect (I hate those things)

    I'm looking forward to the first range session with this pistol and then I'll post back with more info on trigger, accuracy, reliability and so forth.
     
    Last edited: Oct 24, 2007
  2. Hoffy

    Hoffy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    187
    Location:
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Bravo!

    Great comparison.
     
  3. DAdams

    DAdams Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2007
    Messages:
    3,080
    Location:
    East Tennessee
    BCC

    Nice choice and hope you like it. I sat around with my BERSA for a couple of days working the safety/decocker. Between it loosening up and my thumb toughening up, the twains met. I seldom to never use it as a safety and use the decock when loading up.

    Nice pics and thanks for sharing.
     
  4. Dallas Jack

    Dallas Jack Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    265
    Location:
    Dallas, Tx
    The decocker should loosen up with use, mine did.
    Dallas Jack
     
  5. rantingredneck

    rantingredneck Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2007
    Messages:
    1,777
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Nice comparison photos :).
     
  6. Bobo

    Bobo Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2005
    Messages:
    906
    Location:
    Central, VA
    Very nice comparison - thanks!
     
  7. Jackal

    Jackal Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    4,367
    Location:
    Northwest Washington
    Pop that flimsy +1 off the Keltec and it becomes much more pocketable.
     
  8. NewShooter

    NewShooter Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    252
    Location:
    ohio,USA
    Nice comparison. Looking forward to your review. I really like the Bersa.
     
  9. BridgeWalker

    BridgeWalker Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2007
    Messages:
    722
    Location:
    Lansing, MI
    Nice comparison, I really like the kel-tec :D

    Almost got the Bersa last week. Glad I didn't.
     
  10. ZeSpectre

    ZeSpectre Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    5,503
    Location:
    Deep in the valley
    Delta9,
    Hope you get lots of reliable use out of your Kel-Tec. Unfortunately mine has been an absolute nightmare but I don't want this to become a "praise or bash" thread, I'm trying to stick to just reviewing new equipment.
     
  11. ZeSpectre

    ZeSpectre Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    5,503
    Location:
    Deep in the valley
    Range Update

    Took the Bersa to the range last night and ran 150 rounds of Winchester White box and 20 rounds of Cor-Bon 90gr JHP.

    (whoops, have to run to a meeting, I'll finish this post later) :banghead:
    I'm back, sorry about that.

    So I fired 170 rounds of .380 both FMJ and JHP and the gun performed with zero issues. Groups at 20 feet were acceptable and about what I expected from a gun with, essentially, no sights. Ergonomics were good for me and although a fatter grip would provide a better hold I like the thiner grips for the concealability.

    One side note, if you lock the safety on and then rack the slide you can hook the webbing on your hand and it HURTS!
     
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2007
  12. NewShooter

    NewShooter Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    252
    Location:
    ohio,USA
    Deleted
     
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2007
  13. tinygnat219

    tinygnat219 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2006
    Messages:
    2,939
    Location:
    The Land of Northern Hospitality and Southern Effi
    Bersa Bite?
     
  14. ZeSpectre

    ZeSpectre Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    5,503
    Location:
    Deep in the valley
    A question keeps coming up about the weight of the Bersa T380CC. The web page lists it as 23oz (unloaded). This is incorrect. The regular Thunder 380 is that heavy but the Concealed Carry model is actually quite a bit lighter.

    On my "precision" scale the weights are...
    (part in red is the corrected numbers see post # 16)

    Kel-Tec P-3AT
    Magazine w/+1 extension
    7 rds ammo in mag, 1 round in chamber (8rds total) = 12oz even
    (Unloaded w/out mag the P-3AT weighs in at 7 & 3/4 oz)

    Bersa T380CC
    Magazine
    8 rds ammo in mag, 1 round in chamber (9rds total) = 21oz (corrected number)
    (Unloaded w/out mag the T380CC weighs in at 16 & 1/4oz)
     
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2007
  15. Wilson 17&26

    Wilson 17&26 Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    334
    Location:
    Texas
    Are you sure those scales are precision? Unless I misread your posting, 9 rounds of .380 ammo in your Bersa weighs 2.25oz but one less round in your P-3AT weighs 4.25oz. Either your scales are off or that plus one extension is made of lead and should be tossed in the trash :)
     
  16. ZeSpectre

    ZeSpectre Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    5,503
    Location:
    Deep in the valley
    Hrmmm, precision should have been in quotes (I was being sarcastic, sorry)...have edited it now.
    Also, you made me wonder so I went back and looked and DUH, One example had heavier FMJ and the other had lighter JHP in the mag. Also I'm not entirely sure I had a 9'th "chamber" round for the T380CC sitting on the scale.

    I'm apparently having a sloppy day.

    I went back and re-measured twice more and the results tally up both times so I have revised above post with correct info (both guns holding the same "heavier" FMJ rounds) and my thanks for pointing that out. So in the end the loaded T380CC is almost two loaded P-3ATs
     
  17. Josh Aston

    Josh Aston Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    613
    Location:
    Mountain Home, ID
    The magazine safety is ridiculously easy to remove on the Bersa. Take off the right grip panel and remove the bar that runs from the bottom of the grip up.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page