MCMXIautomatic
Member
I've heard a lot of people talk about how the Mosin Nagant is more accurate at distance with the bayonet attached, as they were sighted in at the factories that way and the Russian military doctrine of the time dictated that the pig sticker remain fixed at all times, whether it was a 91/30 or an M44.
I don't know if this is true or if it's just another one of those internet gun myths that everyone seems to take as gospel. I've had two Mosins pass through my hands but I never shot either of them very much so I couldn't confirm or debunk this claim.
However, it got me wondering: if it IS true, then could the same apply to the SKS? If I were to extend the spike on my Norinco and take a few shots with it at 100 yards (which I've strangely never thought of doing before), could I expect to see tighter groups? Have any of you ever done this with the same thought it mind? It seems plausible to me since the SKS was designed in the waning days of WW2 and the Simonov would have most assuredly been conceived with the Red Army's then current SOPs in mind.
I don't know if this is true or if it's just another one of those internet gun myths that everyone seems to take as gospel. I've had two Mosins pass through my hands but I never shot either of them very much so I couldn't confirm or debunk this claim.
However, it got me wondering: if it IS true, then could the same apply to the SKS? If I were to extend the spike on my Norinco and take a few shots with it at 100 yards (which I've strangely never thought of doing before), could I expect to see tighter groups? Have any of you ever done this with the same thought it mind? It seems plausible to me since the SKS was designed in the waning days of WW2 and the Simonov would have most assuredly been conceived with the Red Army's then current SOPs in mind.
Last edited: