Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Smart guns

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by tuj, Feb 25, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. tuj

    tuj Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2011
    Messages:
    1,982
    Location:
    Houston
    Hi fellow shooters!

    While this concept has been around for a while (I think I remember reading about S&W doing something like this back in the 90's), I'm hearing more and more about it. If you're not familiar, the basic premise behind the 'smart' gun is that you need something else in close proximity to the gun for it to be able to fire. This could be a bracelet, watch, ring, etc.

    Obviously there are a lot of concerns; your gun now has to have a battery although battery life has improved dramatically in low-power applications such as this. Also, its much more common to think to charge your cell-phone, so maybe 'charging' the battery in your gun while it resides in your safe, etc, wouldn't be so bad.

    I still see a lot of negatives, such as 'what if the system doesn't unlock when I need it?' But for certain situations, maybe this system would offer some advantages? I'm thinking in particular of LEO's who are probably at the greatest risk for being shot with their own gun. Yes, there are retention holsters in wide use now, so maybe its a moot issue.

    I personally would be against a 'smart' gun at this point in time. But I welcome other thoughts on the topic and would like to know what you all think?
     
  2. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    47,955
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    Is this inspired by the $2,000 Armatix .22lr that ignorant internet sources are lauding?

    While a smart gun that only works in the hands of authorized owners has many benefits the idea of having to pay $1,400 for the handgun and another $400 for each user to purchase the key (RFID watch) is absurd unless you have more dollars than good sense.
     
  3. tarosean

    tarosean Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2010
    Messages:
    5,312
    Location:
    TX
    If it's electronic it can be hacked

    I'd also be concerned with service life... While it might be okay for a gun that sees 200rds in its lifetime, what about 50-100,000rds?
     
  4. Hardtarget

    Hardtarget Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,972
    Location:
    Nashville, Tn.
    If its a really good idea...let the police and the Presidents secret service men use them for a year or two to show us "citizens" just how reliable the system is. Then we'll talk.

    Mark
     
  5. HammsBeer

    HammsBeer Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2013
    Messages:
    755
    Location:
    Minnesota
    I work in auto repair, and those "smart keys" that are all the rage fail more often than you would think, leaving the owner stranded and towing the vehicle to the shop. I don't want a "smart key" for my car, I deffinately don't want a "smart" gun. There is a towing service when your gun fails, it's called the coroner.
     
  6. akv3g4n

    akv3g4n Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2013
    Messages:
    428
    Location:
    Hiram, OH
    As mentioned in other threads about smart guns, the real concern for me is someone being able to use jammers or other signal interrupting devices to make the firearms inoperable. You can bet that if it's possible, criminals would take advantage to make sure that they are the only one with a working firearm in that scenario. I bet they would stick to the old "dumb" guns.
     
  7. pockets

    pockets Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,134
    Location:
    in my own little world
    Honestly? .....YAWN......
    I've been reading that smart guns are here for at least the past 30 years now. Back when the battery pack for one filled the entire magazine well (single-shot anyone?).

    BTW: My car's 'smart key' fob has a backup metal 'dumb key' inside of it.
    .
     
  8. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    47,955
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    Since hacking RFID chip enabled systems is as easy as going to ebay and purchasing a kit for under $50 I'm not sure I'd need to pay these companies for multiple authorized user "keys" when I can make my own.
     

    Attached Files:

  9. FAS1

    FAS1 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2009
    Messages:
    594
    Location:
    San Antonio, TX
    So, this gun has a back up key for when the electronics fail?
     
  10. itsa pain

    itsa pain member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2013
    Messages:
    1,489
    This is not a good omen for gun rights. In ten years they will have a system way better and more restrictive then now. With the way the ammo supply is going throw in smart guns and it don't look good
     
  11. Outlaw Man

    Outlaw Man Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,870
    Location:
    Cleaning my guns.
    I think that's his point. Even a technology as "standard" as smart key fobs has known unreliabilities, so much so they provide a "cheat."
     
  12. Guy B. Meredith

    Guy B. Meredith Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,292
    Location:
    Salem, Oregon
  13. herrwalther

    herrwalther Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2013
    Messages:
    3,216
    I barely trust electronics with my firearms to store them as I have an electronic keypad lock on my full sized safe. I would never have them in order to make my weapon fire or make it safe to fire.

    ETA: Anyone who thinks smart guns are a good idea watched James Bond Skyfall and (License to Kill?) too many times.
     
    Last edited: Feb 25, 2014
  14. JRWhit

    JRWhit Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    971
    Location:
    MO
    When you say smart gun it makes me think of this, "system update required. Please perform update to continue. "
    Just saying with technology updates are a necessity as older systems become vulnerable to hacking.
     
  15. Skribs

    Skribs Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    5,807
    Location:
    Lakewood, Washington
    I don't want to pay extra for a potential source of failure. It's that simple.
     
  16. Ridgerunner665

    Ridgerunner665 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    3,393
    Location:
    Upper East Tennessee
    I don't care if it works....I still don't want it.

    I am not a follower of, nor do I believe in, letting technology replace common sense.

    The end result is disaster...personal responsibility is something we must hold on to...if we lose that, we've lost it all....it is part of our Freedom, the most important part....the foundation of it all.
     
  17. Skribs

    Skribs Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    5,807
    Location:
    Lakewood, Washington
    We've all discussed the electronic failures, what about human failures?
    • You left your RFID chip in your pants pocket, which is in the laundry room. Meaning you now have 2 rooms to go through to get your gun and get it working.
    • You lost your RFID chip.
    • Even in a good case scenario, you have to put your watch on to use the RFID chip in a HD situation. This is much slower than simply racking the slide or flicking off the safety.
    • Forget using a $50 device to make your own RFID chip. If you store it near your gun (needed for quick access), a BG will have access to it.
     
  18. HexHead

    HexHead Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    3,352
    Location:
    TN
    I'd rather be considered a criminal than use that junk.
     
  19. Ridgerunner665

    Ridgerunner665 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    3,393
    Location:
    Upper East Tennessee
    Let me rephrase in light of the previous post....I don't care of it works, and they implant an RFID into each hand....I still don't want it.
     
  20. Ky Larry

    Ky Larry Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2003
    Messages:
    3,526
    Location:
    Ky
    Would each gun come with a seperate ring,watch,whatever or could an owner of multiple guns have them coded to all work off the same ring,watch,whatever? I would hate to have to find the right gun-whatever combination while armed intruders are in my house. This is just another lib-**** feelgood idea that doesn't quite stand up in real life. Remember Murphy's Law and Murphy's Principle.
     
  21. HammsBeer

    HammsBeer Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2013
    Messages:
    755
    Location:
    Minnesota
    "Your firearm's current version of Java is out of date. Please download the latest version and then reboot your firearm to complete the update before resuming shooting"
     
  22. Guy B. Meredith

    Guy B. Meredith Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,292
    Location:
    Salem, Oregon
    I absolutely agree with Ridgerunner665.

    Like I posted elsewhere, imagine a child--little Dottie--playing with her mother's jewelry which just happens to include the ring, bracelet, watch, etc. necessary to enable the "smart" gun mommy has left laying on the jewelry table.

    Or maybe the gun left laying out because the doodad is going to disable it is stolen by an older child or criminal and the mechanism defeated and bypassed.

    This technology is totally bogus in preventing use by criminals or anyone else who would steal it.
     
  23. shafter

    shafter Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2011
    Messages:
    775
    I have no use for a "smart gun". Heck I have a hard enough time accepting the Tupperware stuff, never mind something with a battery in it.
     
  24. RetiredUSNChief

    RetiredUSNChief Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2012
    Messages:
    7,149
    Location:
    SC (Home), VA (Work)
    Personally, I don't foresee any of these high-tech smart guns, whose actual function is to prevent unauthorized users via high-tech electronic means, as being anywhere near use by the military for a long time to come.

    Police? Maybe. Their small arms needs are different than that of the military.

    Yeah, I realize there are some high-tech military small arms designs out there, but they're not the same.

    The military's concern is primarily on the battlefield, in combat against enemy forces of other countries. I don't think they'll take kindly to guns which may be hacked or jammed by enemy forces. Nor to high-tech guns which aren't hardened against EMP.
     
  25. preachnhunt

    preachnhunt Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    428
    Location:
    Central Ky.
    Who is to say that all of the smart guns couldn't be disabled with some kind of EMP?
    This is just back door gun control, i.e a solution looking for a problem. No smart guns for me.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page