Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Smith and Wesson revolver choice

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by sprice, Apr 17, 2009.

?

what should be my first revolver?

  1. smith wesson 27 .357 mag

    68 vote(s)
    87.2%
  2. s&w 29 .44 mag

    10 vote(s)
    12.8%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. sprice

    sprice Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2008
    Messages:
    916
    What should be my first revolver? Either a s&w model 27 or 29 is what i was thinking, what about you?
     
  2. JustinL

    JustinL Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    277
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    I would recommend the 27 as the .357 is cheaper/easier to shoot.
     
  3. Duke of Doubt

    Duke of Doubt member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,863
    Model 29 is a classic piece of art.

    But ... your first revolvers? Dang, man; get a Colt Army Special or Smith Model 10 first.
     
  4. Rio Laxas

    Rio Laxas Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2007
    Messages:
    835
    Location:
    Texas
    My 5" 27-2 is my favorie firearm and it's fun to shoot.
     
  5. Zundfolge

    Zundfolge Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    10,755
    Location:
    Colorado Springs
    First get the 27 ... then as soon as you can, go get that 29 (.44mag is just a HOOT!)
     
  6. harmonic

    harmonic member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,247
    Your first revolver? Dang, son, I'd take the money and buy two lesser expensive revolvers. Like, a model 19 and a model 17. The 19 lets you shoot 38 special and 357 and the 17, which is 22, is cheap to shoot.

    If you buy a 44 mag and don't reload, you'll have to take out a loan every time you go to the range.
     
  7. Iggy

    Iggy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,011
    Location:
    Wyoming
    What Harmonic said.
     
  8. orionengnr

    orionengnr Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2005
    Messages:
    5,434
    Harmonic--
    Don't know where you shop, but I can't get an M-17 and an M-19 for the price of an M-27.

    My M-17 cost me $450 (since sold and replaced with an M-18 for $400).
    My M-19 cost me $450.
    My first (6") M-27 cost me $450 (since sold).
    My second M-27 (5") cost me $600 (within the last eight months).

    If you can get a nice M-27 in a barrel length that appeals to you, I'd grab it now--they are neither plentiful nor cheap. You can shoot as many hot .357s as you want through it, or shoot light .38 loads (which is not necessarily true of the M-19).

    I'd look for the .22 next, and shoot the daylights out of it. If you can find a nice M-19 later on, great. Can't see any advantage to the M-19 unless you're going to carry it (slightly smaller/lighter), and mine's too pretty to carry. I have a 586 for that :)
     
  9. Racinbob

    Racinbob Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    Messages:
    693
    Location:
    Central Florida
    Since he mentioned the two he's looking at the 27 is a much better choice in my opinion. I agree with JustinL.
     
  10. Deanimator

    Deanimator Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    10,599
    Location:
    Rocky River, Ohio
    I had a Model 29 before I had a 27. Now I've got two of each.
     
  11. Loyalist Dave

    Loyalist Dave Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2006
    Messages:
    1,832
    Location:
    People's Republic of Maryland
    I like the model 13 myself for a first revolver, or a 65. I like to recommend fixed sights for new shooters is all I'm saying. The other variations, 19, 27 etc are also very good.

    LD
     
  12. jfh

    jfh Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2003
    Messages:
    4,859
    Location:
    Maple Plain, MN
    I vote with Harmonic, I think--but the real issue would be whether or not the N frame (27, 29) is a good fit for your hand.

    Be sure to try gripping the different frame sizes.

    Jim H.
     
  13. Clarence

    Clarence Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    507
    Location:
    KCMO
    I love the M29, but if its your first S&W I'd go for the M27.
     
  14. 351 WINCHESTER

    351 WINCHESTER Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2007
    Messages:
    4,042
    My first revolver was a model 27. I purchased it in 1974. It was beautiful and shot like a dream. I had an 8 3/8" bbl. which was a mistake when I got a holster for it. Someone stole it from my truck while I was at work. I have a model 29 and it's about as good as revolvers get - it was made by real craftsmen in a time when they were made right. It wasn't cheap.
     
  15. JWF III

    JWF III Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2007
    Messages:
    1,183
    Location:
    Mansfield, Georgia
    I voted M-27. But shop the used market, and when you find one (either model) that speaks to you, at a price you're willing to pay, get it. Keep shopping around for the other.

    Wyman
     
  16. ArmedBear

    ArmedBear Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    23,171
    27

    .38 and .357 are unmitigated fun to shoot.

    .44 is only fun for X rounds, depending on the rounds and the gun. Also, if you don't handload or plan to start, .44 has gotten far too expensive for most of us to play with a lot.:(

    With any centerfire handgun, reloading is the next step if you really want to enjoy it (both dramatically lower cost and a much larger variety of loads, combined with really getting to know your gun well, lead to far greater enjoyment for the handloader IMO).
     
  17. BCRider

    BCRider Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2008
    Messages:
    7,714
    Location:
    Pacific North"Wet" Coast of Canada
    I've found that my hand is good for about one cylinder worth of .44Mag. Meanwhile I could shoot a whole box of .357 without any issue.

    I wouldn't turn up my nose at a nice tight and good looking Model 28 either. Granted it's a plain jane version but when you're peering over the sights and squeezing off a round the 27 and 28 look and feel the same.
     
  18. Diggers

    Diggers Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2007
    Messages:
    890
    What is it for?

    Just going to the range and secondly as an SD option....then the .357 for sure, with out a doubt.

    If you intend to use it for more out doorsy type camping hiking backpacking activities then the .44 MIGHT be a better option depending on where you are.

    .44 ammo is $$$$$. You will shoot way more with .38's
     
  19. skoro

    skoro Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,058
    Location:
    Texas
    I'd get the .357 and use .38spl rounds for most of the shooting.
     
  20. ChristopherG

    ChristopherG Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Messages:
    1,933
    Location:
    Central WA
    Everyone's first revolver should be a .357. And everyone's second revolver should be a reloading press and components to load 5 or 10 or 20 thousand rounds of .38.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page