Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Smoke pole homework?

Discussion in 'Blackpowder' started by Wylie1, Mar 18, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Wylie1

    Wylie1 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2011
    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    Shoshone Idaho U.S.A.
    I was just tinkering with my CVA Buckhorn Muzzle loader today and was wondering if any of you may have done some customizing of you smoke poles for greater accuracy?

    I can get some pictures of where I'm at and fill you in more on where I plan to go with this muzzle loader if you'd like?
     
  2. junkman_01

    junkman_01 member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,728
    Location:
    Florida
    I'm sure you are proud of it, but it's a modern in-line, so don't bother.
     
  3. Wylie1

    Wylie1 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2011
    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    Shoshone Idaho U.S.A.
    I understand where you're coming from but if I'm able to help someone make their muzzle loader more accurate I can't see the harm in posting a few pictures of work done to a modern muzzle loader. :neener:
     
  4. Yarddog

    Yarddog Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Messages:
    503
    Location:
    FL.--There's a Gator in the bushes & She's callin
    Heck I still shoot my side lock & hunt with it, A TC New Englander iron site out to a 100yds 3" groups from bench ; ) PS Good luck on the MODS
    Y/D
     
  5. Jaymo

    Jaymo Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,530
    I approve of making improvements. I like for anything of mine to be the best it can.
     
  6. Wylie1

    Wylie1 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2011
    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    Shoshone Idaho U.S.A.
    Yarddog,
    Thanks! I may have even brought a second life back to my old Mosin today, got the stress off the receiver, found some points that were bound up. She gets some new scope rings tonight. This Barnes CR10 is some amazing stuff and I just don't mean the smell.:barf:

    Jaymo,
    I'm all about that myself!
     
  7. arcticap

    arcticap Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2005
    Messages:
    6,185
    Location:
    Central Connecticut
    I'd like to know more.
    What are the improvements, free float the barrel and/or bed the action?
     
  8. Wylie1

    Wylie1 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2011
    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    Shoshone Idaho U.S.A.
    Yep, although I haven't done the bedding yet I am working on a way to stop the tamping rod from creating tension on the barrel. The stock didn't seem real stable for the floating of the barrel so I cleared out all of the support plastic and epoxy bedded an aluminum channel for the tamping rod to slide in and to create some strength in the stock so it wouldn't move soo much after the barrel was floated.
    [​IMG]

    I think I'll fill the plastic block full of epoxy, I was going to do it today but other projects came first.

    I'll try to remember to update this as I go along.
     
  9. scrat

    scrat Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2007
    Messages:
    6,882
    Location:
    Monrovia, CA
    The CVA buckhorn is a very accurate rifle right out of the box. There really isnt anything that can be reasonably improved. Same time why. Your biggest challenge is just finding the right load the works well with your muzzle loader. For mine. Right out of the box i found using Sabots was very very accurate. i purchased several different types as well as blank sabots to use my own bullets. I found that using any type of hallow point bullet reduced accuracy to the point to where it was useless to use. Most spiere type bullets worked very very well. However sabots were also a pain to load and clean. So then i tried using the R.E.A.L mold by lee. i started casting my own then just tailored down the load until i found something that really works. right now using the REAL mold with some bore butter i use 95 grains Goex 2ff and it seems to really work. So as for the muzzle loader there is not much to do. its a muzzle loader not like you can cut the stock and put a folding stock with a fixed bayonet and a red dot laser with a flashlight on the left when you have 1 shot.

    I guess i can do all that, it may just scare the cardboard or steel that i shoot at to fall over on its own.
     
  10. Wylie1

    Wylie1 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2011
    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    Shoshone Idaho U.S.A.
    There is always room for improvement. This muzzle loader had a slight push from the left side of the stock on the barrel.
    They are illegal for hunting here so I can't see using a different bullet at the range and than have a different POI in the field.
    The only bullets I have found that are legal are hollow points, 295 grain Powerbelt none coated are what we use for Elk here. If I am correct we can't customize our bullets here for hunting either.

    I use 95 grains but I use 777 and I had to change the breech block to a #11 cap because we can't use 209s. I've read that the 777 and the #11 caps are a bad mix because of ignition issues but as long as I keep the nipple clean it doesn't give me any issues.

    A laser would be illegal here as well as optics. I only shoot at paper with the muzzle loader for sighting in and then it's off to the field for freezer fillings.

    Rules are pretty strict here in Idaho compared to other states when it come to hunting.
     
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2011
  11. Loyalist Dave

    Loyalist Dave Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2006
    Messages:
    1,890
    Location:
    People's Republic of Maryland
    While there may always be "room for improvement" not every improvement may be an advantage to the human operator. It's nice to bed the barrel, and worry about the stock rubbing, or pressure from the ramrod..., on a 1000 yard gun that would really be a factor. Are you shooting it that far?

    The only accuracy "advantage" in an inline is the ability to throw the projectile accurately over a longer distance than its traditional ancestors (imho). The best method for this is the sabot, but if you are limited to modernized conicals a-la the CVA powerbelt..., you are now closer to traditional range, OR you are mounting a tang peep sight or mounting a mil dot scope (or perhaps messing with scope adjustments when in the field).

    The Civil War rifles threw heavy conicals over long distances, with adjustable sights, at standing human targets. Before I'd worry about improving the barrel accuracy, I'd get a load that was accurate close, and a sight system to extend that accuracy beyond a football field. When I got it close to 250 yards and accurate enough to hunt, then I'd worry about bedding, and stock pressure and ramrod pressure. :D

    Otherwise it's an academic exercise, which can be lots of fun I admit :D, but are often not practically applicable. (OK I will also admit I have tinkered with many a long arm to see how accurate I could really get it to shoot, and I wasn't competing or anything..., I was just curious. :D) Meaning, I know a fellow who uses his own loads for his rifle, and at the range he can put bullet after bullet in the same hole at 200 yards..., but he can't get anywhere close to that shooting it without the bench and a stool. Put him in the field, and all that "accuracy" gives him fits (barrel heavy, stock doesn't fit him right when he's all that is supporting it, high magnification scope "dances" all over the place, and he's not used to a tight shooting position in the field). ;) In fact he doesn't use his bench rifle for hunting.

    Another person at the local club has a Remington bolt action carbine in .308. Pencil thin barrel, and it doesn't group well at all at 100 yards. BUT the first shot from the barrel is extremely accurate. (Additional shots heat the barrel and he throws a "string" on the target)

    He could worry about the wooden stock changing pressure on the barrel as the humidity and season changes, he could free float the barrel and bed the action, he could have a better barrel installed, and he could have an after market trigger (maybe a Timney) installed. AND he wouldn't take more large game than he does now, for all of those modifications really make a difference at a match nor at very long range..., not necessarily on the first shot for most folks. ;)


    LD
     
  12. Jaymo

    Jaymo Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,530
    Hurry, let's all p*ss in his Cheerios and trample his enthusiasm.
    Come on, guys. There's nothing wrong with his endeavors to improve his gun. After all, why should we even shoot black powder when much more modern guns exist?
    The answer is for the fun of it. For some of us, improving things is fun. I enjoy modding and improving air rifles as much as powder burners.
    Small improvements are improvements, nonetheless. Better is better than not better.
    Why put a scope on a gun? It doesn't make the gun more accurate. But, it DOES enable you to shoot more accurately, by eliminating some of the human error/limitations of human eyesight involved.
    I am intrigued by his efforts and applaud them.

    Just because a particular load shoots well prior to bedding/accurizing, doesn't mean it'll shoot as well after. It could shoot much better, or much worse. I say apply everything that is known about accurizing rifles to the gun, and then work up a load.
    I've had plenty of powder burners and airguns that shot better with one load/pellet after tuning/accurizing than they did before. I've seen mediocre pellets/loads become preferred by the gun and I've seen stellar performers become mediocre after accurizing.

    More accurate is always better, so long as it doesn't adversely affect reliability.

    I say bed it, free float it, and then work up a load. Most of all, enjoy it. We don't have to justify our hobbies or pleasures(as long as no one gets hurt) to anyone other than ourselves, and sometimes our wives.
     
  13. junkman_01

    junkman_01 member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,728
    Location:
    Florida
  14. arcticap

    arcticap Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2005
    Messages:
    6,185
    Location:
    Central Connecticut
    Some folks who have gotten less then stellar performance from their expensive muzzle loaders often resort to bedding their gun and action, sometimes very elaborately. A lot of otherwise nice guns of all sorts only need some expert tinkering to help them give more accurate and reliable performance.
    Only the owner can decide whether the rifle is meeting his expectations or not. Shooting and making improvements to them can be a rewarding hobby, the gun is a personalized tool, and learning how to fix some of their related issues are all part of the art of gun smithing.
    A lot of folks like to tinker with their revolvers and I've seem some great improvised fixes shown by people who are very talented and dedicated to the shooting sports.
    Everything that they do and show us is archived here on THR for others to learn from and to try out for themselves if they think that it's a good idea.
    Even how a gun is adorned is a form of art.
    Well done Wylie1, please keep us updated about your progress.
    That's an impressive custom ramrod channel and artfully done. :)
     
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2011
  15. Wylie1

    Wylie1 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2011
    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    Shoshone Idaho U.S.A.
    I was questioning myself in posting modifications to a short range gun but this is what I do. I am a perpetual tinkerer and there is a lot of trail and error involved in a lot of cases.

    I'd take that first shot pencil thin barreled rifle over a heavy target rifle any day of the week because it's the first round out of the barrel that matters to me. Loyalist and Purist are synonymous Dave and I don't hold anything against fly fishermen either but when it comes down to it I can fish the same waters with a spinning rod and most of the time match or do better then most fly fisherman.

    As far as ranging at greater distances I am working with a three sight system at the moment that does make target acquisition a bit tougher but narrows down the error margin IMHO. The verdict is far from being cast on this system at this time being all the projects I have going but I hope to make up my mind before I have to hunt with this muzzle loader.

    Jaymo,
    No worries man. :)
    Even award winning inventors have critics and nay sayers, if they are open minded enough to take the greater percentages comments into account the better they make out in the end, is the way I have been dealing with it.

    I shoot black powder because of the Elk hunts we have here in Idaho. Although I wasn't lucky enough to bag one this year I did help pack one out that was taken with the same muzzle loader I own. The 54 cal. that was loaned to me for the weekends hunt wasn't grouping very well so the weekend after I had the Buckhorn without much experience with it.
    This is exactly what I'm doing although I have a good idea of what could be brought out of the gun while the barrel was bedded in the stock pushing on the barrel.

    I agree 100% although the wife had to go!
     
  16. Wylie1

    Wylie1 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2011
    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    Shoshone Idaho U.S.A.
    arcticap,
    Looks like you beat me to the post. :)

    Thank you!

    I'll just have to see how it does once I'm finished with what I'm doing and go from there. Being what tension there was on the side of the barrel is the only reason I floated the barrel. If I end up bedding the barrel again I'll start by just bedding it to its taper point and go through the evaluation again.
     
  17. Jaymo

    Jaymo Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,530
    Wylie1, funny you mention that it's a short range gun. Look at the time and money spent customizing and accurizing pistols, and it's universally accepted as a good expenditure of money.
    I'm not a huge fan of inlines. I like them, but I'm more interested in traditional. However, they do have their uses and advantages.
    I own a TC Thunder Hawk inline that I was thinking about using as the basis of either a BP shotgun, or a prechargaed pneumatic big bore airgun. I paid 30 dollars for it and found it has a Timney trigger when I stripped it to clean it.
    I may bed the action, install a Pachmayr Decelerator or Sims Limbsaver recoil pad and keep it as a frontstuffing .50 cal rifle, using cast conicals. I'm just not a huge fan of plastic sabots and pistol bullets. If I want .444 Marlin power, I can hunt with my Marlin .444 and have 6 shots on tap. Though it is nice to have that kind of power in a smokepole. I think I'll stick to TC Maxi Hunters in it. That gives even more muzzle energy.
     
  18. Wylie1

    Wylie1 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2011
    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    Shoshone Idaho U.S.A.
    Nice! That would be $30 well spent.

    I swap over a limb saver (The squishy rubber Wally World model)from my Mosin when I'm shooting the CVA. The $20 for this limb saver has gone a long way so I got another for the 770 I was given as a gift.

    Sounds like you have a pretty nice collection!
     
  19. buttrap

    buttrap Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,088
    Location:
    Oregon
    We the issue is most places they are not legal for for hunting is all.
     
  20. Wylie1

    Wylie1 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2011
    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    Shoshone Idaho U.S.A.
    Excuse me, I don't understand?
     
  21. alsaqr

    alsaqr Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    3,351
    Location:
    South Western, OK
    I scope and sight in a lot of muzzleloader rifles for local hunters. The CVA BuckHorn is a very good rifle.

    Wylie is right: When the ramrod is installed and removed the stock flexes. The CVA BuckHorn suffers from the flexible "tupperware" stock that plagues the StagHorn and the Mag Hunter. For several years i've been floating the barrels and glassing the receiver contact points; but the ramrod problem is still there.

    Wylie, i'm interested in the modifications that you're making to your rifle. Please keep us informed.
     
  22. Wylie1

    Wylie1 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2011
    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    Shoshone Idaho U.S.A.
    Okay, I'll get pictures and post them as I progress with the Buckhorn.
     
  23. Wylie1

    Wylie1 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2011
    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    Shoshone Idaho U.S.A.
    Dealing with a tupperware stock.

    As I am waiting for reloading materials for my .308 I decided to turn my attention toward the stock on the Buckhorn today.

    I still haven't got the ram rods pressure off of the barrel but this is all working up to just that.

    Just as I found with the Remington 770 the Buckhorn utilizes tapered screws which I find to be a mistake in plastic stocks. At least the Buckhorn has the trigger guard for proper seating of one of these screws the other I think I have worked up a pretty good remedy to.

    First I chucked up a hex screw left over from some motorcycle handlebar clamps and drilled a depression for the screw to seat into properly leaving enough of the hex recess for a wrench to get a good grip on the screw.
    [​IMG]
    Then I ran a smaller drill bit in just beyond the depth I needed for a pillar bedding application of this screw.
    [​IMG]
    After that I had to make a couple runs at getting the length just right because the tapered screw head messed with me a little. Once the length was correct it screwed right into place.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    Then I grabbed another threaded cylinder I had from a lamp I scavenged and made a pillar for the rear screw at the trigger guard. I plan to make a sleeve and press it into this pillar later to tighten up tolerance.
    [​IMG]
    So in effect I pillar bedded the Buckhorn's stock today and once I have the material to bed the two connection points I'll go ahead with that.
     
  24. Wylie1

    Wylie1 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2011
    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    Shoshone Idaho U.S.A.
    Other then a little epoxy to hold it in place and a little thicker o-ring I think I have the ram rod tension on the barrel cured but I have to see when all the stock work is finished. I'm going to mill a little area on the ram rod where it sits in the sleeve attached to barrel and put some shrink tubing on it to quite any rattles.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  25. BCRider

    BCRider Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2008
    Messages:
    7,737
    Location:
    Pacific North"Wet" Coast of Canada
    I'm surprised at the attitude of some folks to this thread. While Wylie's gun may not be an old classic or even a copy of an old classic the stuff he's doing could easily apply to the oldies in principle and for some of us the fact that he's using a muzzle loader and plain sights would make him a brother in arms. And then the old adage comes to mind "If you don't like what you see then don't look".

    Wylie, the channel you added should result in some added stiffness. If you still want more than merely filling in the open cells of the shell will do more to add weight than making any appreciable difference in stiffness. If you want to add a lot more stiffness I'd suggest you chew out the plastic along the sides to allow sections of carbon fiber to be laid in with epoxy to bond it in place.

    Carbon fiber rod is available in various round and rectangular sections from quite a few places these days but the one I know of in particular is http://www.acp-composites.com/home.php .

    Any carbon fiber "rails" you lay in do not need to be one solid piece or even full length. But any overlaps you make should be over a few inches and fairly close together to ensure that the encapsulating epoxy provides a good bond between the rods or plates used to form the stiffening rail inlays. And sanding down the outside of the rod to remove the shiney finish is also a good idea. Such sanding should be done outdoors and it needs to be fine paper used so as not to cut into the fibers more than needed to obtain the dull finish for a better bond.

    I'd suggest using small rod sections in multiple pieces so it can fill more of the channel over a single larger piece. For example a bundle of ten to a dozen overlapping .030 rods cut to fit and fill whatever track you chew out and then all laminated into one rail would be better than a single 1/2x1/8 rectangular section that you have to cut and notch to make it fit and that still doesn't fill in the channel all that well. And using smaller section rods to form a bundle means you can mold the rails around corners so you could extend these stiffening rails along the barrel, past the action and fan them out into the rear shoulder portion of the stock a couple of inches behind the butt of the barrel to stiffen up the stock from stem to stern. This last part may require drilling a few holes that extend back but it would be very much worth it if the goal is to stiffen up this plastic noodle that it appears to be from your description. There's not much point in stiffening up the fore end if it "hinges" at the rear of the barrel around the action.

    This bundle of carbon rod would be wetted out with mixed laminating epoxy and then bedded in with more of the same epoxy thickened and made lighter by adding phenolic microballoons. And be sure to use the thinner laminating epoxy so that it wets the surfaces out more fully and flows better than with the more common and thicker glueing epoxy found in tubes. And when you're mixing in the lightening micro balloons for the filler part don't be stingy with the phenolic. As long as it is still able to slump down it's good. Just "putty" it in, lay in the wetted bundle of rods that you prefit and then top it off with a little more. What little you use will then at least be as light as you can make it.

    Between your aluminium channel and a couple of laid in built up carbon rails the stock should come out easily as stiff as a good wood stock.
     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2011
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page