Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Sniper rifles, assault rifles, etc (rant!)

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by mhdishere, Aug 19, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mhdishere

    mhdishere Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    Messages:
    429
    Location:
    New Jersey
    This came to mind while I was reading the post about surplus police weapons being sold, particularly the part about bolt-action sniper rifles.

    It seems that people are confusing the use to which a particular weapon is put in a particular instance with its category. If someone gets on top of a building and shoots someone 200 yards away with a 30-30 lever action rifle with iron sights, that rifle is a sniper's (note the possessive!) rifle, it's a rifle being used BY a sniper. The week before it may have been a deer-hunter's rifle. If it's used by a home-owner to repell home invaders it's a home-defender's rifle.

    I've known people who could reliably hit a 6 inch gong, off hand, and 200 yards with a .22. I wouldn't want them shooting at me with a 22 because I'd end up dead. On the other hand (where I have five fingers) I've known people who (to clean up my father's phrase) couldn't hit a bull in the posterior with a load of buckshot if he was tied to the stall. As we've said before, it's the person doing the shooting, not the weapon, that makes it dangerous.

    I also think we're in-part to blame. All this "tactical" stuff in the ads, the "sniper rifles", the "assault rifles". Call it what it is, it's a bolt-action .308 rifle with a 10x scope, black synthetic stock, bull barrel, and integral bipod. You can use it to punch holes in paper, to get your deer, to justifiably shoot someone, or to commit murder. And if you use it for the last purpose we're gonna be all over you like white on rice.

    OK, rant over.
     
  2. R.H. Lee

    R.H. Lee Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2004
    Messages:
    7,377
    Location:
    CA
    Exactly. I could use my automobile as a "weapon of mass destruction", or I could use it to drive to the grocery store for milk and cookies.
     
  3. Justin

    Justin Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    19,285
    Location:
    THE CHAIR IS AGAINST THE WALL
    They could paint an AR15 pink and call it the Fluffy Bunny Special and the anti's would still accuse us of being a bunch of homicidal, knuckle-dragging psychopaths. The anti's will call us whatever names they see fit.
     
  4. GEM

    GEM Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,379
    Location:
    TX
    Jan Libourel, the gun rag editor, told me once that he would like to describe guns like that. However, the consumer base loves the tactical, killer, ultimate stopping, ballistic, assault, sniper, etc. rhetoric.

    It is the implication of tough guy and violence that is attractive to so many folks.
     
  5. Damon

    Damon Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2003
    Messages:
    110
    Location:
    Virginia
    It doesn't matter what you name them, the media will still mess it up.
     
  6. nico

    nico Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2003
    Messages:
    2,212
    Location:
    Baltimore/Laurel, MD
    GEM has a good point. And the worst part is a lot of those people are voting for kerry. ie: the 21 year old who buys a USP or a desert eagle (which is an awesome, unbelievably reliable gun) because he played counterstrike.
     
  7. mhdishere

    mhdishere Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    Messages:
    429
    Location:
    New Jersey
    You make good points about the media painting our guns in a poor light, but do we really have to go along with them? When we talk about buying a sniper rifle, or an assault rifle, we're buying into the terms the anti's have coined, not us.

    We're giving the rifle qualities it doesn't possess on its own. When people say a "rifle is accurate out to 500 yards", well that depends entirely on the ability of the shooter doesn't it? If you don't actually function as a sniper you don't have a sniper's rifle, and if you do what ever rifle you happen to be using is a sniper's rifle. Just because a rifle is accurate at long range, fires a powerful cartridge, has a scope and other features that make it easier to shoot at long range doesn't make it a sniper's rifle because the person using it isn't a sniper. I might buy one and for me it would be a "high-powered target rifle", another person might buy one and it would be a "deer hunter's rifle".

    This (believe it or not) isn't political correctness. It's a matter of accuracy in the terms we use. Granted, a deer rifle could be my grandfather's "thutty thutty", or it could be a Steyr Scout with all the goodies. If you say "Scout rifle" most shooters have an idea what you mean, mostly from the forward-mounted scope. People who've read up on it know quite well what it means in terms of action, cartridge, weight, length, etc. I've heard of "sniper rifles" in everything from .22 LR to .50 BMG, single-shot, bolt or semi, about the only thing they have in common is a scope.
     
  8. 5knives

    5knives Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2004
    Messages:
    120
    Location:
    Over Yonder on the Sunset Side of the Hill
    As someone says on another forum:

    "The firearm is just a tool, I'M the weapon!

    He makes a good point, I'm sure I'm not the only one on this forum who can be very homicidal with a Bic pen.

    Never hear about that in the media, just the guns and of course thr "terrorist box cutters.

    I've been listening to the hype, the BS, and the PC twaddle for nearly 70 years now. I'm really sick of it!:cuss:
     
    Last edited: Aug 20, 2004
  9. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    Oh, fine! You sound like the kind of person who thinks criminals cause crime. How very unmodern!
     
  10. Onmilo

    Onmilo Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    9,773
    Location:
    Illinois`
    Apparently when the shooting is eyeball to eyeball the bangstick is a "close quarter battle rifle.:"
    When fired at long range targets of opportunity the bangstick is an "interdiction rifle."
    If a telescope of any sort is installed on the bangstick it is a "sniper rifle" unless the bangstick is a handgun which then becomes a "choice of professional assassins."
    The AK47/AKM individual combat weapon is "the commies and terrorist choice."
    And the M16A-whatever is a "POS"
    As for me I have always had a soft spot for the short barrelled shotgun also known as a "whippit gun."
    Oh incidently the 'bangstick" is another name for the "weapon, individual, single shot, 12 guage, protective/hunting, underwater."
     
  11. reagansquad

    reagansquad Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Messages:
    386
    Here's my theory;

    Criminals are the cause of crime, but poverty, lack of education and opportunity are the cause of criminals. Where do guns fit into that equation? They DON'T!!! SO LEAVE THEM ALONE!
     
  12. mustanger98

    mustanger98 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2004
    Messages:
    2,986
    Location:
    Union County, GA, CSA
    Let's see here...

    "Guns don't kill; people kill."

    "Guns cause crime like flies cause garbage."

    "If guns cause crime, all mine are defective."

    "Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my gun."
     
  13. Zundfolge

    Zundfolge Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    10,755
    Location:
    Colorado Springs
    Then they would accuse gun manufacturers of "targeting children" with their marketing. :rolleyes:
     
  14. chetth

    chetth Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2004
    Messages:
    81
    Location:
    Suburbs of Philadelphia
    Hey I plan to buy an AR15 pattern gun in September and put pink furnature on it because my daughter wants a pink gun. :D

    Someone on another forum suggested that all firearms be required to be hot pink (or lime green / blaze orange) to eliminate the evil from EBRs and other guns. What serious bad ass would carry a 'Hello kitty' gun?

    of course, bullets still come out the dangerous end...
     
  15. Justin

    Justin Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    19,285
    Location:
    THE CHAIR IS AGAINST THE WALL
    Last year, when I had time to shoot the occasional high power match, one of the women who participated had a pink AR.

    Oleg has something along those lines on his website:
    The Aesthetics of the Gun Debate
     
  16. 10 Ring Tao

    10 Ring Tao Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    945
    Location:
    SE MI
    [anti] But cars have other uses than killing!!! Guns are only meant to kill!!! [/anti]
     
  17. chetth

    chetth Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2004
    Messages:
    81
    Location:
    Suburbs of Philadelphia
    milk and cookies

    This is EXACTLY the argument that I have repeatedly tried to counter. Because it shows an knee-jerk emotional response. Good counter-strategies welcomed.
     
  18. Edmond

    Edmond Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    1,465
    Location:
    Wish You Were Here
    You can't forget that Hollywood also feeds false information into the minds of people.:rolleyes:
     
  19. Tharg

    Tharg Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    Messages:
    566
    Location:
    DFW TX
    heheh... i was the one unsure of the definition of a "sniper rifle" in that said thread....

    however,,, as i recall i STILL pointed out that it would take a human component to make a capable gun... well... capable.

    btw... the hello kitty AR15 made me giggle my ass off.... and now i want one.... just for shock effect. (cause ya know - the business end STILL ain't smilin) I wonder how many criminals when faced w/ such a gun - would stutter step ... wondering *** is that? rofl oops too late... bang bang bad rat person... <snicker>

    hehe

    J/Tharg!
     
  20. mustanger98

    mustanger98 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2004
    Messages:
    2,986
    Location:
    Union County, GA, CSA
    I recall reading on one of these message boards- here, BR.com, M14FiringLine, I disremember which- where somebody opined that guns weren't designed to kill. Guns were only designed to fire a bullet. What uses to put a gun to are up to the owner/operator.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page