Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

So I messed with a SCAR today.....

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Eightball, Jun 8, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Eightball

    Eightball Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    Messages:
    4,257
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    ....and frankly, don't see where the money is on the thing. In an 18" configuration, it was lighter than many ARs, I'll grant it that.....but I still wasn't all too impressed for the $3000+ price tag at which the shop had it :what:. The stock felt....weird. Some of the latches and things didn't look like they'd hold up for a significant period. The adjustable cheek piece was pretty spiffy, though, I have to admit. Overall, the stock mechanism felt somewhat like ye standard 6-pos stock, so maybe it'll hold up better than I think. The charging handle also reciprocates with the bolt, so anyone who would otherwise use the thing for a CMP-ish match might break most of their fingers (depending on their hold). The integrated ambidextrous mag catch was intriguing, and the lower polymer half definitely took a few cues from an AR15 lower. The barrel seemed really thin, like an govt/R4 profile's "thin" part the whole length. I also noticed the complete lack of a bayonet lug.....are our troops moving away from that option? The BUIS were all sorts of funky, IMO. Like a mix between the PADS (PADI?) sight that is on the RRA Elite rifles these days and an HK rear sight's peep mechanism.

    It was kind of nifty, really really light, really "adjustable"....but too freakin' expensive. Yes, that shop marks things up....but then again, they're the only people I know of who would even THINK about getting a few of these things in stock. Now, if the SCAR-H ever hits civvie shelves, and is just about as light.....THAT will be worth seeing.

    P.S. I only got pictures on my phone's camera, which I cannot upload. Sorry. The receiver still has that freaky "gold" color to it, though.
     
  2. P.B.Walsh

    P.B.Walsh Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,287
    Location:
    Tuscaloosa,Alabama
    I thought that the SCAR had a SAW barrel profile?
     
    Last edited: Jun 8, 2009
  3. TeamRush

    TeamRush member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2009
    Messages:
    100
    I didn't see the big deal when we fired them at the SHOT show either.
    The guys were going on and on about how GREAT they were,
    but I just didn't get it...

    No more accurate than an AR or any other 5.56 service rifle,
    and they had some ODD ways of doing things I didn't see why...
     
  4. P.B.Walsh

    P.B.Walsh Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,287
    Location:
    Tuscaloosa,Alabama
    USSOCOM, saw something special, wonder what it was?
     
  5. HorseSoldier

    HorseSoldier Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2006
    Messages:
    5,297
    Location:
    Anchorage, AK
    It runs better with very short barrel lengths and with suppressors.

    I really liked the SCAR the one time I got to put some rounds through one, but have an equally hard time justifying the price tag when it comes to purchasing a civilian one. For $1500, I'd have picked one up the day they hit the market. For $2000, I'd have one by now. But for the very high 2000s it's just a very hard sell . . .
     
  6. dscottw88

    dscottw88 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2007
    Messages:
    772
    It doesn't do anything my AR doesn't already do. And my AR does it all for 1/4 the price tag.
     
  7. yongxingfreesty

    yongxingfreesty Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,396
    it's for tactical folks
     
  8. Jacka L Ope

    Jacka L Ope Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Messages:
    382
    Location:
    Washington State
    Repaired... :D:neener::D
     
  9. MarineOne

    MarineOne Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2009
    Messages:
    361

    Why anyone would do this is beyond me, but I can guarantee I won't be buying one.



    Kris
     
  10. yongxingfreesty

    yongxingfreesty Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,396
    ^^ lol, that's what I meant
     
  11. Owen

    Owen Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    5,964
    Location:
    Georgetown, TX
    Probably the same reason they did it on the M1, M14, AK-47, etc. It's simple.
     
  12. H2O MAN

    H2O MAN member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    2,438
    Location:
    USA
    The SCAR is not getting the warm welcome that was expected...
     
  13. CoRoMo

    CoRoMo Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2007
    Messages:
    8,953
    Location:
    Californicated Colorado
    The color alone makes me shake my head.
     
  14. maskedman504

    maskedman504 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2009
    Messages:
    913
    Location:
    State Line Road KS/MO
    If we start fighting in Siberia, will they make one in white?
     
  15. P.B.Walsh

    P.B.Walsh Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,287
    Location:
    Tuscaloosa,Alabama
    Probaly not....., be very cool looking though..... :)
     
  16. HorseSoldier

    HorseSoldier Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2006
    Messages:
    5,297
    Location:
    Anchorage, AK
    On a good day, dealing with tabbed, badged, or whatever SOF guys is like herding cats. Neither the SCAR or anything else will make everyone in that community happy. The main comment I heard when I was still on active duty wasn't that the SCAR was bad, it was that a lot of guys didn't see any point in spending the money on a new rifle when the M4 worked just fine. Some guys said the same thing about the HK 416, etc.
     
  17. Evil Monkey

    Evil Monkey member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2006
    Messages:
    1,486
    While I have no proof of what SOCOM was asking for, I am confident that the reason they must have wanted a reciprocating charging handle was so that if the user had to assist the bolt forward, he would just slap the charging handle forward.

    This is in contrast to other rifles using a non-reciprocating charging handle where a secondary function must be fulfilled before pushing the charging handle forward (ex: pushing in the handle toward the receiver to make contact with the carrier, then pushing the handle forward....)

    It's easier to strike something rather then to manipulate it in a certain fashion. For what it's worth, the m4's forward assist is also great for a weapon with a non-reciprocating handle because all you have to do is strike it with the palm of your hand, instead of twisting and turning and all that other non sense.
     
  18. SHvar

    SHvar Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Messages:
    648
    I think the 416 was a better choice for their purposes, and they saw that to. Its familiar, its almost the same as what they spend their career training on, alot less training is needed to adapt to it. Also Delta force helped to design the 416 for SF purposes. The SCAR was headed to the civilian market for the past few years, the military decided against it replacing the M-4.
    Aside from this the military 416 upper fits an M-4 lower, and cost alot less than the SCAR, most SF units are buying 416 uppers with their own budgets. H&K sells 416s on contract for around $1000 each complete.
     
  19. MTMilitiaman

    MTMilitiaman Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2005
    Messages:
    2,690
    Location:
    Missoula, Montana
    Warm welcome?

    At $3K, it obviously wasn't meant as a rifle for commoners.
     
  20. Iansstud

    Iansstud Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    Messages:
    336
    can you change the caliber on this rifle??
    When does the Masada come out?? or Bushmaster ACR?? last I heard was summer 09 and It was saposed to be multicaliber
     
  21. HorseSoldier

    HorseSoldier Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2006
    Messages:
    5,297
    Location:
    Anchorage, AK
    Some not most, and the ones we had carried their own problems with them. A 4-5 MOA carbine like the HK416s some of our ODAs had is okay for < 100 meter kind of work, but it starts sucking if you start pushing the range at all. (Some end users were literally impressed enough that they switched back to M4 uppers, if that says anything . . . not unlike the situation with HK's equally hyped wunder-magazine for the AR.)

    Most people who consider the 416 the be-all, end-all solution haven't touched one, much less put it through the paces on the range or downrange.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page