Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by dukefan70, Dec 13, 2009.
Well, if that's the case (and I'm not convinced that it is), you've precluded the statements in the rest of that post.
"There are no data" is an a priori disproof of the assertion that "it makes no difference." Not having any data means, quite specifically, that we do not know whether there is a difference or not.
How 'bout we let people get the best fit they can, since the rifle's made to be tweakable? It's a LEGO set; use that characteristic in your favor. Then, of course, go out and practice a lot. Get instruction and so forth. We can't buy skill by adding gadgets to rifles, but that's a separate issue.
The OP asked, "which did you like better for the weight difference and the feel?" My answer: gun fit matters, it's easy to set up an AR to suit your preferences, and my own preferences are as I've stated above.
PRS is not collapsible
UBR can be had for $250 just about anywhere
PRS can be had for $207
but mostly, i think the point wasn't that we wanted a pinned collapsible stock like the sort used in ban states where they want the look of the m4 but aren't allowed to have a collapsible stock so they pin it to the fully extended position.
the point was that many of us put our collapsible stocks in a position we like and leave them there because we don't have any reason to further collapse or extend them.
Downside is they may be less durable... but flexibility is a pretty big upside IMO.
Separate names with a comma.