Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Some judges are still doing things the right way.

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Clean97GTI, Oct 5, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Clean97GTI

    Clean97GTI Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2004
    Messages:
    2,377
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    Just a short story that I thought High Roader's might like.

    This morning, I was in North Las Vegas justice court to appear because of a speeding ticket. I arrive early, check in and await my turn as this court requires everyone to appear before a judge. The court goes through its dockit in alphabetical order and as my last name falls in the M's, I had a while to wait.

    One of the guys ahead of me gets called and greets the judge. The judge responds and is polite as he reads through the charges and asks for the man's pleas. The charges are pretty serious including possesion of cocaine and a firearm. The man pleads guilty to all charges and is awaiting sentence recomendation from city atty. The attorney is a little behind as he shuffles through papers, then he turns to the defendant and asks for the man's green card. The man replies that he doesn't have one.
    Now, this catches the judge's attention. The judge asks him very directly if he is here legally. The man responds negatively and the judge's pleasant demeanor immediately disappears. I swear, you could hear the defendant thinking "Oh s***."
    The judge immediately orders the man taken into custody and instructs the clerk to contact the ATF and the US Attorney. He then addresses the man and says (I'm paraphrasing here) "You don't sneak into MY country, sell drugs and carry guns!" "You let all your friends know that I'm not playing around and I don't think the sentence you'll get is long enough."

    The whole time, I'm thinking that this judge has the right idea and its too bad his thoughts on the matter aren't echoed in Washington.
    I would have liked to catch the judge after court and ask his opinions on things of this matter. He seemed like a very tough, but fair man with an excellent understanding of how laws are to be applied. He also seemed to have a sense of justice that seems to be lacking in other courts. Shame really that a small town judge is doing it right in a small town when he could be doing it right on a bigger stage.

    Judge VanLandschoot, you're a good man.
     
  2. Preacherman

    Preacherman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    13,309
    Location:
    Louisiana, USA
    Wish we had more like him!
     
  3. Henry Bowman

    Henry Bowman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    6,717
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    So how did it go on your speeding ticket?
     
  4. dolanp

    dolanp Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    944
    Location:
    Texas
    That's the problem really, because if he was on a bigger stage the Jesse Jackson types would be coming out calling him a racist anti-immigration bigot and all of that garbage. :barf:
     
  5. Clean97GTI

    Clean97GTI Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2004
    Messages:
    2,377
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    My speeding ticket was only 10 over.
    Went in, plead No Contest, paid my fine and I have to attend traffic school sometime in the next 30 days.
    Ticket reduced to a non-moving violation and no points on my record.

    Next time, I'll be more careful. Fairly inexpensive lesson learned. I'd imagine mine was a nice break after some of the other more colorful characters in the court that day.

    The ones that amazed me were the people who had come back to court and hadn't completed their assigned work programs (usually for more serious offenses)
    All they had to do was show up, work as required and they avoid jail time. Guess they like the accomadations. :rolleyes:
     
  6. Gordon Fink

    Gordon Fink Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,322
    Location:
    California
    Don’t worry. A lot of the folks in Washington, D.C., think you shouldn’t have guns or the wrong drugs either.

    ~G. Fink
     
  7. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    Yeah, but he's not a crony of the rich and powerful.
     
  8. Crosshair

    Crosshair Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    1,985
    Location:
    Grand Forks, North Dakota
    OK, you need to find this judges favorite beer. We can all pitch in and buy him a keg of it. :cool:
     
  9. c_yeager

    c_yeager Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2003
    Messages:
    5,479
    Location:
    Seattle
    Yeah, i love judges who are all about calling the ATF cause someone was "carrying guns". Notice that the *one* federal agency that wasnt named was the INS?
     
  10. Molon Labe

    Molon Labe Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,700
    Location:
    SW Ohio
    Yea, I was kind of thinking the same thing.

    IMO his biggest crime was coming here illegally. He had a gun? So what? He has a right to keep and bear arms...
     
  11. ChiefPilot

    ChiefPilot Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2003
    Messages:
    228
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Wow. We do need more judges like this one.

    Sorry, I disagree with this. His biggest crime was possessing cocaine, which was then amplified by carrying a weapon, in addition to being here illegally.
     
    Last edited: Oct 6, 2005
  12. Alex45ACP

    Alex45ACP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    1,464
    Location:
    USA
    Whoop de do.

    Carrying a gun and possessing drugs, two things that shouldn't even be illegal.

    I'm glad he got caught for being an illegal alien though.
     
  13. Molon Labe

    Molon Labe Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,700
    Location:
    SW Ohio
    Oh, I see. So keeping and bearing arms is a privilege bestowed upon people who adhere to government-defined rules. :rolleyes:
     
  14. GunnySkox

    GunnySkox Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,129
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    Uhm, I think he probably had them call the ATF since, if the fellow was a DRUG DEALER and an ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT that his weapon was probably acquired in some MASSIVELY ILLEGAL fashion; the ATF probably wants him to find out who sold him the gun, to aid in any investigation into illegal arms trafficking that might be going on.


    :rolleyes:

    ~GnSx
     
  15. ChiefPilot

    ChiefPilot Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2003
    Messages:
    228
    Location:
    Minnesota
    No, keeping and bearing arms is a right for law abiding U.S. citizens. Your hero was neither.

    :scrutiny:
     
  16. RealGun

    RealGun Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2004
    Messages:
    7,257
    Location:
    Upstate SC
    On a grander stage, perhaps the Supreme Court would rule that an illegal immigrant was denied due process. :rolleyes:

    This morning the Senate passed a bill to grant special rights to Gitmo detainees. My sense of right and wrong does not include being impractical, certainly not suicidal. Their prisoners get decapitated. Ours get special laws to make them comfortable.
     
  17. Gordon Fink

    Gordon Fink Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,322
    Location:
    California
    Wrong. The right to keep and bear arms is a natural right, bestowed not by government but—as some would have it—by God.

    ~G. Fink
     
  18. ChiefPilot

    ChiefPilot Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2003
    Messages:
    228
    Location:
    Minnesota
    The affirmation of that right is not contained in a document that has world-wide jurisdiction but rather in one that applies only in the United States. That the B.O.R. affirms or grants rights is not at issue here, but rather that the right is affirmed for citizens of the U.S..

    Our hero is an admitted criminal here illegally. Sorry, no rights for you. And that is how it should be.
     
  19. Molon Labe

    Molon Labe Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,700
    Location:
    SW Ohio
    I see. So I have a right to bear arms only as long as a government recognizes it. :rolleyes:

    ChiefPilot... every human on this earth has the right to keep and bear arms. Furthermore,

    - This right does not come from the UN's Declaration of Rights. (Blasphemy!)

    - This right does not come from the government. (Our government does not have the authority.)

    - This right does not come from the Constitution / Bill of Rights. (Our Bill of Rights does not give us any rights; it simply says that the government won't take them away.)

    - This right does not come from the Founding Fathers. (Our Founding Fathers did not have the authority.)

    - This right does not come from the Declaration of Independence.


    Our natural rights pre-date government, and thus do not depend on the government for their existence. They can only come from one source: God. (Or if you prefer, our "Creator.") In other words, you're born with them.

    Now having said that, if you live in a country where guns are prohibited (e.g. Japan), you still have a right to keep and bear arms. But the government has prohibited you from exercising this right.

    Understand, now? ;)
     
  20. RealGun

    RealGun Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2004
    Messages:
    7,257
    Location:
    Upstate SC
    I certainly wouldn't say that. Arms are just tools. Needing arms is a practical matter. I consider self defense to be an instinctive reaction to danger and then of a much higher order, spiritual if one chooses to look at it that way.

    Allowing that one might own and use weapons respects and facilitates the right of self defense and self determination. Using the law to declare and protect a right to own and carry weapons is a social contract. What use of those weapons is considered acceptable is also a social contract. We are not and never will be free to use weapons at will.

    If their was a better weapon that weighed about 20 ounces less and fit in my pocket, I would be happy to carry something other than a gun and then do all my shooting at the range.
     
  21. Gordon Fink

    Gordon Fink Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,322
    Location:
    California
    Our wonderful Bill of Rights merely establishes a legal framework in which we can contest violations and infringements of our natural rights. Without it, our only alternative would be force.

    Rights are inalienable. They can neither be taken nor given away. The only way to deprive a man of his rights is to kill him.

    ~G. Fink
     
  22. RealGun

    RealGun Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2004
    Messages:
    7,257
    Location:
    Upstate SC
    Once we agree via the law what those rights might be. I believe that is the central issue on the abortion question, assisted suicide, right to die, and many would contend RKBA on the State and local level.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page