Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Someone just bullpup'ed an AR-15 and succeeded.

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Hammerhead6814, Nov 26, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Hammerhead6814

    Hammerhead6814 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    701
    It's called the Longziz #1.

    I looked for another forum or post where there might be more information on this and came up short. He says there is an AR-15 lower in that thing. I'm guessing that is an AR-15 barrel.

    Hope he gets a range video up soon.

    EDIT: Found more on this thing! From what I can tell he is using a completely new upper and blot. The upper I understood from the beginning but the bolt intrigues me.
     
    Last edited: Nov 26, 2011
  2. P.B.Walsh

    P.B.Walsh Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,287
    Location:
    Tuscaloosa,Alabama
    I sorta like the concept, love the inovations and the pursue of developments!
     
  3. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    45,612
    Location:
    Alabama
    Very cool.
     
  4. hammerklavier

    hammerklavier Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2009
    Messages:
    837
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Near as I could tell, he said the AR15 bolt will work for for left/right eject, but he had to make a new bolt to work with the gas piston/bullpup design.
     
  5. FIVETWOSEVEN

    FIVETWOSEVEN Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
    Messages:
    5,051
    That is one really neat gun, I would love to have one. Reminds me of the FS2000.
     
  6. ants

    ants Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2007
    Messages:
    3,503
    Very cool. Talented fellow, this Aerostar. I found some old Chinese threads going back to 2005, where he intended to make a 'drop-in' chassis. You just drop your AR15 receiver into it, and go shooting. The current design uses it's own receiver and carrier design. The rails on the outside are from his 2005 project, adapted to the current design (actually, the rails are just a decorative shell over the top of his barreled action).

    As opposed to the Aug and FS2000 designs, he moves the AR buffer and spring to the FRONT of the receiver, around the barrel, and links it to the bolt carrier (from which he removes the back half, since it's not needed to push the buffer into the AR buffer tube).

    He has a lug on top of his carrier set up for gas piston operation, but I can't see where he installs the piston. Perhaps that's why he's just testing with a primed case rather than loaded ammo. He mentions that he has trouble getting it to work on live ammo.
     
  7. 68wj

    68wj Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2010
    Messages:
    1,654
    Location:
    Upstate
    Waiting on an ArchAngel kit for the RRA PDS or Para AR next. :evil:
     
  8. JHenry

    JHenry Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2011
    Messages:
    504
    Location:
    Montgomery Al
    im not a fan of making a weapon bull-pub. F2000,s, p90s, AUG's etc are great but leave the ARs and the AKs alone
     
  9. 451 Detonics

    451 Detonics Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    2,442
    Location:
    Indiana
    I would have to say I have a tough time calling setting off a single blank round a "success". You want a bullpup AR buy a Bushmaster...close enough...
     
    Last edited: Nov 26, 2011
  10. alemonkey

    alemonkey Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2007
    Messages:
    1,678
    Location:
    Lincoln, NE
    I'm not a fan of bullpups but that looks pretty neat.
     
  11. Maverick223

    Maverick223 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    11,260
    Location:
    28078
    That is an interesting concept, but I think I'll stick to my M-17S...which looks to be pretty much what he's emulating to begin with (AR-15/18 bolt type + gas piston operation + bullpup configuration). I do wonder why on earth he would choose a long-stroke GP. :confused: That decision will probably have a negative impact on accuracy.

    :)
     
  12. kwelz

    kwelz Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,835
    Location:
    Henryville, IN
    Success is a relative term.
     
  13. Hammerhead6814

    Hammerhead6814 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    701
    Ooookay. So let me re-phrase this as "... succeeded relative to other attempts to bullpup an AR-15". Like the one listed here. It's toward the end of the page titled "Ace AR Bullpup conversion".

    If this goes into production, it would beat the M17S is that is appears to accept standard AR-15 barrels (see the second link on the first page), magazines, and it can eject from either the left or right side which prevents brass from flying in your face.
     
  14. Maverick223

    Maverick223 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    11,260
    Location:
    28078
    I seriously doubt it will beat the M17S where it counts...accuracy and reliability. From the looks of it, it won't be able to use unmodified AR barrels either, and the M17S already accepts standard AR-15 magazines of any type that I've tried (which is a long list). It's correct that you can't change the ejection pattern, but that's a minor issue IMO.

    :)
     
  15. 22lr

    22lr Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2008
    Messages:
    853
    Location:
    GA
    To echo the sediments of posters above, I like the ingenuity, but id pass on it as a gun id actually buy.
     
  16. FIVETWOSEVEN

    FIVETWOSEVEN Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
    Messages:
    5,051
    Why?
     
  17. Maverick223

    Maverick223 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    11,260
    Location:
    28078
    +1, new ideas is the stuff that breeds innovation and new designs. It doesn't matter if it works, or is a downright foolish idea, some good may come of it, so why not? I think there are enough ARs and AKs, and parts thereof, to cover one or two used in some crazy R&D experiment. I don't particularly care for it, but who knows the inventor may revise the design, or devise something entirely original, and come up with something revolutionary...for this reason I'm glad he's working on it. As unlikely as it is, he may become the next JMB.

    :)
     
  18. Zerodefect

    Zerodefect Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2009
    Messages:
    4,347
    Location:
    Yakutsk, Sakha Republic
    Fail.

    Another Bullpup that ejects cases directly into my eye or ear. :banghead: That's great if you live in a dimension where everything moves right and the left side of cover deosn't exist. Ambi? Whuts that?

    Have any of these guys witnessed the FN F2000, P90, or Keltec RFB ejection???
     
  19. Maverick223

    Maverick223 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    11,260
    Location:
    28078
    IMO ambi-ejection, in the form that swaps the bolt & ejection port to the other side (after all you're either rt. or lt. handed so why is there a need to switch...particularly when you have to disassemble the rifle and use different parts?), isn't a big deal, but I have to admit the downward and forward ejection designs (like those mentioned) sure are nifty.

    :)
     
  20. gunnutery

    gunnutery Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Messages:
    1,682
    Location:
    Iowa
    Innovative bullpup using AR15 lower

    http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/...g-homemade-bullpup-with-ar-15-lower-receiver/

    I did a quick search to make sure no one else posted this. It looks very well thought out and the ambidexrious issue is also addressed by a cheek piece that flips allowing the user to switch ejection from side to side without taking down the rifle.

    Appearantly the inventor is a member of ar15.com but I'm not a member there so I haven't looked for it.

    Thoughts?
     
  21. Mr.454

    Mr.454 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Messages:
    186
    Location:
    Northwest Ohio
    Looks pretty neat but then again I love bullpups. I'd love to hear what the trigger weight is.
     
  22. gunnutery

    gunnutery Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Messages:
    1,682
    Location:
    Iowa
    Same here. The barrel looks a little long, but he's still in the development stage anyway.
     
  23. Kaeto

    Kaeto Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2006
    Messages:
    1,242
    Location:
    Lincoln Park, Mi.
    I love the way he fixed it for changing ejection direction.
     
  24. aerostar

    aerostar Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    33
    Location:
    tx
    I almost forgot I have an ID here.

    If you guys prefer, and the board permit, I can repost what I did in ARFCOM.

    :evil:
     
  25. Andrew Wyatt

    Andrew Wyatt Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    4,468
    Location:
    Bakersfield, California
    That would be optimal.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page