A common revolver will shoot 1" at 25 yards off the bench. Danged few autos will match that. I much prefer revolvers for outdoor carry, also much more versatile in the loads they will take without malfunction. You can load light for small game, heavy for big game with no function problems.
DA takes practice. I've been doing it for near 40 years now, kinda figured it out in that length of time. SA is for long shots, but up close, DA all the way and I can put them where it counts post haste. My Taurus 66s, medium frame guns, are tack drivers and big enough to soak up the recoil of heavy magnum loads. Both have good DA triggers and are very controllable. They have adjustable sights.
I had a SP101, 2.3". I sold it back to my SIL when he got back from Iraq. It was a shooter, 2" at 25 yards off the bench (great for such a short sight radius) and hit POA with .38 wadcutter AND heavy magnum loads from 140 to 180 grains. That gun was impressive, but I'd promised my SIL I'd sell it back to him. The sighting and POA might have been a fluke, I guess. I have a 3" Taurus 66 I carry and like a lot, only slightly more pain than the SP101 to tote and and extra round in the cylinder. It shoots near POA with .38s when adjusted for magnums, near enough that I don't mess with the sight when shooting .38s. It's about an inch low at 25 with wadcutters and an inch high with +P when sighted for a 140 Speer JHP .357 over 17 grains 2400. My 3" puts 'em into 1.5" at 25 and my 4" 66 will shoot them into an inch. The only centerfire auto I've ever shot that could rival that is a Ruger KP90DC which I like a lot, too.
A very accurate auto will do 2" at 25 and the Glocks I've messed with were capable of that.
It's just all in how good you are with DA and how much you practice, but yes, on the average, I find revolvers mechanically more accurate than autos.