Special considerations when dealing with an elevated shooter...

Status
Not open for further replies.
As events like this become more common a pressure dressing and tourniquet on your person makes a lot of sense.
If taking a pressure dressing and tourniquet to an event was a reasonable precaution, I think I would rather just skip the event entirely. Of course, if we are talking about terrorism, discouraging people from going to events is a secondary goal of the terrorists, so they win if people don't go. In the situation in Las Vegas, however, the only goal of the shooter was simply to rack up a large body count.

Any time you go to a crowded venue, you take a finite risk.
 
If taking a pressure dressing and tourniquet to an event was a reasonable precaution, I think I would rather just skip the event entirely...

Any time you go to a crowded venue, you take a finite risk.

I don't agree with that assertion. I dont think its unreasonable to take that sort of precaution in normal driving, which is another very real reason to have a TQ, and has been used my people that were on hand when they happened and were able to give assistance. To have them at a concert isn't that much of an issue. There are various ways to carry them that make it easier. One carries one flat against you on a belt, and some people carry them on an ankle. Seriously. It may be a reasonable statement to say youre probably more likely to need a TQ than a gun. This being a gun forum, most people put a gun at the top of the list, but a gun doesnt help in many situations that a TQ can, and having one instantly available may mean the difference rather than waiting for EMS to arrive. A TQ or two and a small first aid kit oriented towards gunshot wounds in the range bag may be more useful than a gun to many of us.

Just something to think about.
 
And after all the various countermeasures considered... Here's the first one I'd advocate - one of the topics I had to learn in one of the many classes I was sent to when I took over my agency's Community Patrol outfit (great fun - it included everything from training on down - I even had our marine patrol unit - all at the same time...) was something called CPTED (short for crime prevention through environmental design...). The basic idea was that you could prevent some kinds of crime (or greatly diminish them) by how you either designed the environment in the first place - or how you planned public events.... Hmmm, in this case the first item on my agenda would be... wait for it.... No public concerts right next to (or within shooting range of) nice tall buildings.... Just think - the organizers had their choice of venues and they chose the one that turned out badly. I'm not criticizing them for not thinking of the un-thinkable - I wouldn't have either.... I'll bet, though, in future -outdoor concerts will be held away from places that are natural high elevation ambush points.... if at all possible.

The most common feature of places designed using CPTED principles are things like walls - that you can see through (solid perimeter walls create places where bad things can occur un-observed - pay attention to how the proposed new border fences are built...). Apartment buildings where the parking lots aren't under the building - but out where the tenants can look out of their windows and actually see their own cars... These are simple steps that cost little if anything extra - but actually do cut down on crime opportunities without being obvious about it... By the way, I have no idea whether this kind of training is still called CPTED - so for young officers (and citizens wanting to learn a bit about this sort of stuff) you might have to look a bit through course listings at your local academy - or college that offers police science course work...
 
If you had thought about it ahead of time, your survival plan would probably be better than if you had not considered the possibility. There are an unlimited number of bad situations to consider, but at least thinking about what to do in some of them might help focus the mind when things get crazy.

Luck is the best thing to have on your side. I will take being lucky over anything else.
 
For post #30 - I'm long out of police work and have no further references - I do think that folks involved in urban planning, among other endeavors, are probably familiar with some of the basic concepts...

Not all of the CPTED ideas work out as well as you'd like - the category that irritates me the most are when they're applied to the design of large parking areas for shopping malls and similar projects. You'll know you're in one when you realize that "you can't get there from here". The idea is to discourage criminal actions that involve easy access to parked vehicles by bad actors pretty much "shopping" the lot by driving through it in leisurely fashion. Using those crime prevention principles these kind of parking lots are impossible to drive through and considerably inconvenient for ordinary users. I'm sure they've reduced vehicle break-ins and thefts - but at the cost of making the parking lot pretty inconvenient for daily users... Just another trade-off I guess but the results end up being hard to live with...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top