Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Springfield 1903 Rock Island Arsenal

Discussion in 'Gunsmithing and Repairs' started by wleggart, May 22, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. wleggart

    wleggart Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Messages:
    102
    Location:
    Little Rock, Ar.
    I have a serial number 268591. I have believed that it is a no shooter based on the accepted miminum serial number of 285507. I was recently discussing a possible trade for a 8MM mauser even trade. the collector seemed too eager. Is my gun really a no shooter or is it just don't take a chance? Seems like less than 20,000 serial number guns between no and okay might be a little over cautious. I would appreciate your knowledge and experience on this. Thanks in advance for your comments. I am tempted to try it!
     
  2. Jim K

    Jim K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    17,566
    If the 1903 is in good shape and all original, it is worth several times the value of most Mausers, regardless of the type of heat treatment.

    The problem with those low-number M1903's is that there is no non-destructive test to determine which are OK and which might be dangerous. The serial number situation is only that anything over a certain number will be OK, while anything under might be either good or bad. So over is OK, under is a crapshoot.

    Jim
     
  3. 1KPerDay

    1KPerDay Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Messages:
    12,486
    Location:
    Happy Valley, UT
    Depends on how paranoid you are... lots of guys shoot the "no shooters."

    I don't think I would, personally, but I have a couple shooters to shoot. :)
     
  4. Jim K

    Jim K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    17,566
    Some have argued that there is no danger today because all the single heat treated rifles that were going to blow already have. Since I have no idea (and neither does anyone else, no matter what they say) how many brittle ones there were, or how many have let go, I am not fond of the odds. FWIW, I broke a 1903 SHT receiver with a light ball-peen hammer. It shattered into three pieces and I turned a bit green because I had been shooting that rifle the day before. So being just a bit paranoid might not be a bad thing.

    Jim
     
  5. Got_Lead?

    Got_Lead? Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2011
    Messages:
    348
    I have a Springfield in the 500,000 range, and I shoot it. It has a bran spankin new looking barrel on it with a date stamp of '43. It must have been one of the arsenal rebuilds during the war. The rifle is in beautiful shape, I believe I gave $175 for it about 15 years ago. I got it cheap probably because of its low serial number.

    I don't have a lot of rounds through it, but she hasn't blown up yet. Someday I'll get around to shooting it in service rifle competition.

    I also ride a bicycle (to try to stay in shape a bit). Statistically, you are about 1000 times more likely to be killed by an automobile while riding a bike on the road than for one of the low number 1903's to let loose on you. I'm good with those odds.

    Enjoy,

    Dave
     
  6. Jim K

    Jim K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    17,566
    I don't ride a bike on the road, either, but life is nothing but a series of choices.

    Jim
     
  7. carbine85

    carbine85 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2007
    Messages:
    2,096
    Location:
    Southwest, Ohio
    The rifle has lasted this long, it will most likely last a few more rounds. Depending on what your rifle looks like and which Mauser he has I would bet your rifle is worth more.
     
  8. au_prospector

    au_prospector Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    729
    Location:
    North Georgia
    The first sentence of post #2 is spot on why he is over eager to trade straight up. Dont give it away.
     
  9. lathedog

    lathedog Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    270
    There is another post on this that is active right now. I'd read the other thread too to get all the input. I'm not typing all that stuff again.

    The Army's test is destructive if the receiver is brittle. If it is a good receiver I think it survives the test?

    Since for 99% of us, 99% of our guns are luxury items and we can survive the night without them. I'd recommend not doing anything that makes you nervous. If it is not fun it is not worth the stress. If you need to take the shot to survive a deadly encounter then I would worry much less about the possible heat treat situation on a rifle that has been fired a lot already and is statistically very likely to be fine. Read Hatcher's Notebook on the issue and that might help you a lot.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page