Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Springfield 1911 A1 vs Taurus PT 1911

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by dubious, Oct 26, 2007.

?

Springfield 1911A1 vs Taurus PT1911

  1. Springfield 1911A1

    59 vote(s)
    74.7%
  2. Taurus PT1911

    15 vote(s)
    19.0%
  3. Skip the guns... I want a Box of Chocolates

    5 vote(s)
    6.3%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. dubious

    dubious Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Messages:
    438
    I'm trying to decide on this one... the Springfield seems like the nicer brand, but which is the better gun?
     
  2. possum

    possum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    8,942
    Location:
    Concord, N.C.
    out of all the reviews of the taurus 1911's they have been great and everyone likes them, but at the same time the same is true about sa 1911's i have a sa 1911 and i love it though i haven't had it that long and haven't shot it that much i have experience with other sa 1911's and i have never been dissapointed.

    another big factor for me is that sa takes care of thier customers and they do it right the 1st time and in a timely manner. so i am partial to sa, which i now own 3 sa pistols, they have been great for me in the past and i will forever be a sa owner.

    taurus has a lifetime warranty but getting work done often takes a long time, which is not the case with sa.

    i would go with the sa
     
  3. MICHAEL T

    MICHAEL T Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2004
    Messages:
    6,011
    Location:
    outback Kentucky
    Springfield wins on Warrenty Service alone. Its a + that its a much better pistol to start with.
     
  4. Texastbird

    Texastbird Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Messages:
    280
    Feature for feature, the Taurus blows the Springfield out of the water. I've never had to send any gun I own in for service, so I can't comment on that. But as good as my PT1911 has been I don't forsee needing much in the way of factory support.
     
  5. GunNut

    GunNut Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,075
    Location:
    Washington State
    Springfield Armory.

    As feature packed as the Taurus is, still at the end of the day it is a TAURUS.
     
  6. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    48,411
    Location:
    Alabama
    Springfield, unless you just want to save a little money, and then I still would say, Springfield. :)
     
  7. 10-Ring

    10-Ring Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,037
    Location:
    California
    Seeing that the Taurus is not approved in CA & that I'm not a fan of Taurus anyway, I'd go w/ a Springfield
     
  8. Ala Dan

    Ala Dan Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,879
    Location:
    Home Of The First Capitol Of The Confederate State
    I voted for the Springfield all the way on this one; as they are among
    some of the finest pistols made by Imbel of Brazil~! :scrutiny: ;)
     
  9. JDGray

    JDGray Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    5,131
    Location:
    SW MI.
    I voted SA, no knocks on Taurus, probably come from the same foundry in Brazil. Both still American made, just South:D
     
    Last edited: Oct 27, 2007
  10. AirForceShooter

    AirForceShooter Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2004
    Messages:
    2,763
    Location:
    Central Florida
    Nothing. Absolutely nothing beats Springfields warranty service.

    AFS
     
  11. jad0110

    jad0110 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,048
    Location:
    Somewhere between the Eastern Block states and Flo
    I've heard a lot of good stuff about both guns, so I think either would be fine in that regard. If you can give a few more specifics about what you are looking for, we may be able to point you to a a few specific models. For example, what is your budget (if you don't mind me asking) and what will this 1911 be used for (concealed carry, range fun only, home defense, competition, etc)? What features are you interested in?

    I do agree with others on customer services differences between SA and Taurus. This is an area that SA holds a clear edge. Though I've never used SA's customer service, everything I hear about them makes me conclude that they are second to none. I have used Tauri's customer service, and was so disappointed by they way my problems were handled that I later wished I had just taken my 94 to local gunsmith for service.

    FYI, I own a SA 1911 Mil-Spec that I bought NIB for $525 plus tax. A good price for a Mil-Spec, though you may be able to do better. It was pretty reliable out-of-the box; but it runs perfectly after swapping out the mag springs for Wolff 11 pounders and putting in a Wilson Combat Bulletproof extractor.

    One fairly consistent complaint I hear about the no frills SA 1911s like the GI and Mil-Spec is that they have crummy triggers. Mine was no exception. It had a ton of creep and was very rough. I had a reputable gunsmith do a trigger job on it and the pull is very good now, right at about 4.5 smooth pounds pounds and no creep.

    Good luck in your decision - let us know what you decide!


    Springfield Armory 1911 Mil-Spec, 45 ACP


    IMG_5503.jpg


    IMG_5541.jpg
     
  12. raveneap

    raveneap Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    174
    Location:
    Maine
    I've got both; a SA Full Size Custom Loaded and a Taurus PT1911. The Taurus has many more "extras" than the SA. The SA has outstanding Custromer service. Both have done really well when I've had them out in the field. The SA is at least half again the cost of the Taurus although the Taurus cost seems to be rising daily.

    DSC06867c-2.jpg

    DSC00079photo.jpg
     
  13. sb350hp

    sb350hp Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2007
    Messages:
    195
    Location:
    Oregon
    If you are talking just a mil spec sa I would go with the Taurus. More features, better sights, ton o options. I own a PT1911 and love it.

    My thinkin on this is "it's a 1911 I am not sendin it out to be fixed, parts are excessivly available and so are good tuners, (well at least for me).

    I would go with the Taurus. Reliability is not an issue. Taurus just has earned a bad rep becuase of thier past. Currently they seem to be building fine firearms.
     
  14. Mainiac

    Mainiac Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    79
    Location:
    Maine
    I own 6 Kimbers, 2 SA's, and a High Standard. I was contemplating the purchase of another Kimber when I decided to try the Taurus. It's every bit as fine a pistol as my Kimbers. Extremely accurate, it will eat ANYTHING you feed it and all at a very competative price.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page