Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Springfield or S&W in 1911

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by mrrev, Apr 15, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mrrev

    mrrev Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    Messages:
    69
    I've been set on a S&W 1911 for a long time, the two-tone Dough Koenig and recently started looking at the Springfield A1s in stainless steel with the black etching. The guy behind the counter at the shop started talking about how he preferred the Springfield over a Colt or SW since Springfield has been doing 1911 for a long time, plus he didn't like the SW's new extractor. What do you guys think?

    The two tone SW DK sure does look nice, especially with the rose wood grips, but the Springfield is cheaper and has a similar look...It'll be my first 1911....
    Sway me one way or another....thx again for your input as always....
     
  2. Lonestar49

    Lonestar49 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2007
    Messages:
    2,654
    Location:
    So. Calif.
    SA all the way IMHO

    ...

    Well, don't know if this will sway ya, but I'm ordering a SA 4" all stainless steel, with wood grips, night sights, for 825 NIB, as of all the 1911's with exception of much higher priced 1911's, the SA Champion's adjustable trigger, like my SA 1911 EMP's trigger, is the lightest, sharp, clean, crisp, pull I have come across of any comparable priced 1911's NIB..

    Add to that a lifetime warranty and SA gets another gun buyer.. me.


    Ls
     
  3. MICHAEL T

    MICHAEL T Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2004
    Messages:
    6,011
    Location:
    outback Kentucky
    Colt been doing 1911's a lot longer than the Springfield Company and Colts are made in America. Can't say that for a Springfield Notice I said made not assembled
    Get a S&W if you want I would just get a S&W with out all the added junk and price. I don't like the DK
     
  4. 19-3Ben

    19-3Ben Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2006
    Messages:
    5,146
    Location:
    CT
    Yeah. Those silly guys at Colt. What makes them think they can get into the 1911 business so late in the game when S&W has been making 1911s for a least 4 or 5 years now?


    Colt has been making them for the best part of 100 years at this point. While the real Springfield Armory has been around for a bagillion years, Colt was building 1911's long before the Springfield Armory company ever existed.
    Don't get me wrong. I'm not a Colt guy. I'd rather go with SA or S&W myself. I just think that the counter guy's statement is ludicrous at best.
     
  5. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    48,378
    Location:
    Alabama
    You would not go wrong with either. S&W and Springfield are both putting out quality 1911's.
     
  6. 10-Ring

    10-Ring Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,037
    Location:
    California
    I'd go Springfield :cool:
     
  7. 2nd 41

    2nd 41 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2007
    Messages:
    726
    Flip a coin. I was considering a 1911DK and bought a Springfield Loaded Model 9152 instead. I still might buy the DK.
     
  8. robctwo

    robctwo Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2003
    Messages:
    1,341
    Location:
    Albany, Oregon
    I bought the SA Black Stainless Target a couple years ago, and the S&W1911PD Commander. The SA extractor broke. The Trigger was at least 5-6 pounds as advertised. The S&W has a much better trigger out of the box, the extractor works fine. The ejector needed filed a bit to stop the brass from hitting me in the fore head. I'd go S&W for sure.
     
  9. M47 Dragon

    M47 Dragon Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    127
    Location:
    So. Cal
    I think either one is a fine choice.

    I can only speak to the SW1911DK. The only thing I didn't like about it (not discovered until after I purchased it) was that the thumb safety's shape kept me from engaging the grip safety (sometimes) when using a high grip with thumb resting on the safety. Never had this problem with my plain jane SW1911, but the thumb safety is a totally different shape and size. The ambi on the DK is more rounded, thicker and sticks out further toward the rear of the gun.

    I took the DK into a smith for a FO front sight install, a trigger job (also a new trigger as I did not care for the flat DK trigger) and mentioned the problem I was having. He shaved some metal off of the thumb safety and I haven't had a problem since.

    FWIW, I shoot the DK much better than my plain SW1911, though I love them both. I don't know why exactly - tighter gun if you ask me.
     
  10. Eightball

    Eightball Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    Messages:
    4,257
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    Do you want to always look at a gun you own, and say "but it was cheaper," or look at it and say "Damn, that looks nice, I really wanted it and now I own one!"

    The answer's pretty obvious--get the one you want, not the one you have to justify owning to yourself. Make your first 1911 one you treasure and keep, not one that you had to justify purchasing over another one.
     
  11. Marshall

    Marshall Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    5,569
    Location:
    Oklahoma, Green Country
  12. possum

    possum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    8,942
    Location:
    Concord, N.C.
    i say sa as well i have an mc operator and i love it, i highly recomend there firearms and there comany as a whole.
     
  13. Ala Dan

    Ala Dan Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,879
    Location:
    Home Of The First Capitol Of The Confederate State
    Gentleman-

    both companys manufactuer quality 1911's; as I own firearms made
    by each of these manufactuer'ers. Looking at the over all picture from the
    "high end" side of things, and all else being of equal value- I would have to
    give the nod to Smith & Wesson. They strive hard too put a very decent
    1911 before the American public. Take their basic stainless 5" model 1911
    (product code #108282); its equipped with excellent Novak 3-white dot
    sights, a beaver tail grip safety, and comfortable rubber grips. This gun
    fares well, when put up against a Springfield Armory "Loaded" 1911; and
    in fact, the S&W may be a few $$ less expensive than the SA weapon. ;)
     
  14. Richard

    Richard Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    490
    Location:
    Southeastern Michigan
    I like both of these 1911s and they are good ones but I want to address the internal/external extractor issue. I spoke with my gunsmith, Marianne Carniak, about it and her opinion was the external extractor was fine as long as it was fitted properly. This opinion was shared by Alex Hamilton of Ten Ring Precision; they do not come any better than Alex. Lastly, my Dan Wesson Compact 10mm has an external extractor and it has given me no grief. Regards, Richard:)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page