Squeeze, baby, squeeze

Status
Not open for further replies.

labgrade

Member In Memoriam
Joined
Dec 22, 2002
Messages
1,289
Location
west of Loveland, CO
Had some very entertaining conversation at the house last weekend with a fellow THRer & SO. Thanks, you know who you are. A good time.

Talking about politics (duh), the young gent queried us whether we'd be better off voting for the socialist or for a police state (dems vs 'pubs - as it seemd to turn out) - what would wake up the sheep faster.... we four seem to have a rather libertarian bent. ;)

Too, after touting Matt's book on a local radio station, I mentioned the below article. It ought to get some air-time 1/31 & figured since looking it up off the PC, I'd go ahead & stuff it in here.

FWIW,

AA

Squeeze, Baby, Squeeze
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/neill2.html

by Patricia Neill

I don’t care what you call yourselves, communists or fascists, Democrats or
Republicans, Congressmen or Presidents, judges or lawyers, feudal Lords or Monarchs, Multinational Corporations, Friends of the Great Spotted Suck
Toad, Gas and Electric Utilities, the Sierra Club, the United Nations or
the World Bank. You all have a totalitarian bent and aim for the State to
own and control everything and everyone.

You are, in the words of one of the philosophers writing today, moral
vultures.

You squeeze and squeeze and squeeze and the more the people of any nation yelp and protest, the more brutal you become.

Good.

The more brutal you become, the more the people become aware of your game. People will stand for quite a bit of your nonsense—but you know that. It also helps when you brainwash them silly and stupid with that scourge of modern times, the television. It is by means of television that you enure them to your violence, and your generic nazi tactics; as long as it isn’t happening to them, they can bear watching it happen to their neighbors.

Go right ahead and roast some more Somali kids. We’ll watch.
But slowly, under all the layers of your televised sexuality and your
televised violence, and the stupidity of your "news," the idea grows in
millions of minds that they are watching the creation of the ugliest
totalitarian/fascist beast yet.

Good.

Please squeeze harder. Send out more of your goons masquerading as gang members in their cool black suits. Terrorize and kill even more citizens in "the drug-glazed informant told us the wrong house" drug raids.
Jack more young pregnant wives up against the wall so they miscarry, and
shoot more kids in the back. Use even more tanks.

Please continue, most of all, your policy of stealing property rights
through land-grab environmentalism. This is the most important of all.
After all, the great mass of humans can live without a free press—we’ve
seen that in America for this entire century. By the insidious work of
your televised sex and violence, you’ve made sure that people have lost
their moral compass, so freedom of religion doesn’t much matter to them.

You’ve doing great with the "guns are evil monsters" routine as well. Very
few care about justice, so all your illegal searches and seizures have
profited you greatly.

Keep it up.

Squeeze harder. Some blood needs to leak from our eyeballs.

Do it. Squeeze, baby, squeeze.

Please force more of our young daughters to spread their legs for your
unnecessary and invasive government gynecological exams in the schools. Do not listen to their saying NO. Make them do it anyway. Please press all
of our young men and women into involuntary servitude via your newest
mechanism of "volunteerism." Make them suffer for it. Your doublethink on
this issue alone is wonderful: involuntary volunteerism. Orwell would be
very impressed.

Squeeze. Squeeze harder.

Indoctrinate the young men and women of the Armed Forces a bit more. With your new sex trials, the men will vacate the service, leaving an armed
force of whiny females to defend this country. Good job, that one. Do
keep killing all the officials and journalists who discover your tricks and
disagree with your policies via Apparent Suicide Syndrome. You’re doing
great with this tactic, teaching people who is boss and what thoughts they
are allowed to think and say.

With civilians, property rights will be the crux of the issue, which is why
the people have had "Save the Earth From Humans" shoved quite prettily down their throats for the past 30 years. Please keep taking away our
right—bought and paid for—to do what we wish with our houses, our property, our land. This is good. In fact, if you can manage it in the Congress turned Comintern, raise the taxes on producers, employers, and property owners until they cannot be borne. Put more people out of business and out of work with your "endangered species" ploy. They won’t realize that truly they are the endangered species. Make more species "endangered," for that matter. Take a risk. You’ve earned it, and you’ve become quite good at the Big Lie: make cows and pigs and chickens unavailable for human consumption by putting them on the "endangered" list. Put all animals currently hunted or fished for food or sport "endangered" and then you can outlaw all small arms for civilians.
Squeeze. Squeeze much harder. It is, after all, what totalitarians do best.

You’re doing really well on the death front, with the older ones crying for
Dr. Kevorkian to give them his tender mercies, and an entire generation of
young women willing to kill their own blood and bone wholesale, aided by
the Lords of Medicine. A fine job on this, since now the people can kill
and be killed for the sake of convenience.

We’re coming to the historical point where you really start culling the
herd of humans—but be careful here, since, after all, it’s those
inconvenient humans who provide the money to support your totalitarian
agenda. At least, don’t take too many all at once—a few invented in
laboratories diseases will do to start—AIDS, Ebola, whatever. Don’t overdo it until the big push, of course.

But keep up the squeeze.

Use your free labor in prisons, where many of you have money invested, to
make clothes and other goods for your consumption. This works well, too.
Privatize prisons and run them on the Chinese model. If you run into
trouble on this, note that most current (and rapidly becoming so)
totalitarian governments can easily intimidate their herds of humans by
using tanks against the people, and, needless to say, televising it.

Keep using informant lowlifes to frame your enemies as well as the innocent among the people. Give the ones you catch extremely hard sentences for not knowing, say, that a government snitch had buried "pipe bomb material" on their property. That’s a nifty tactic, and one some people learned from mightily.

Do not prosecute your agents of the government bureaucracy no matter what laws they break, people they kill, or perjury they commit, whatever they may have done in the "line of culling the herd" just let it pass and cover it up. Make it very clear where the lines are drawn and for whom your laws apply. Among the people, the very few are appreciative and aware of the lesson.

Squeeze Real Hard.

Keep lying through your teeth. Various current and former rulers are quite
adept at this and it teaches the people discernment. This is a fine point,
but important. The people learn when they hear when rulers or their agents say "No wrongdoing was done" in the face of blatant and obvious wrongdoing.

Keep well your paparazzi pets, the media. They will live as long and
prosper as well as you. They serve you well. Have them oblige you even
more by ignoring lies, deceptions, thefts and coverups by squeezing them
just a touch as well.

Squeeze us even more, oh "kind-hearted" totalitarians. Until our eyeballs
bleed. On that day, we shall see you reap what you have sown.

March 7, 2000

Patricia Neill is managing editor of a scholarly journal on the life and
work of William Blake, the 18th-century artist and poet.

----------
Note:
"... God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion.
The people cannot be all,and always, well informed. The part which is
wrong will be discontented, in proportion to the importance of the facts
they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions,
it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty.
... And what country can preserve its liberties, if it's rulers are not
warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of
resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to
the facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a
century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time,
with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure."
-- Thomas Jefferson, Nov. 13, 1787, letter to William S. Smith, see
Jefferson On Democracy, 20 (S. Padover ed. 1939).
 
Hm, interesting thoughts. However, the author gives a literary personification to our government as a living being. Doing this insinuates that this "monster" is one being acting on it's own personal motives.

I won't argue that the results seem as if it were a big monster controlling us. But the government is far from being a one-minded entity following a plan of totalitarianism. This makes for a very imaginative story though.

Am I really expected to believe that our leaders make every decision based on a thirst for power and the desire to imprison our citizens in a totalitarian state oneday? Maybe I am just more willing to see the good in everyone, even taking into consideration motives. Painting the opponents of your own personal politics as evil is rather irrational.
 
She left out bad weather, halitosis, and a few other things.

Mizzoutiger said: "...however, the author gives a literary personification to our government as a living being."

Not just ours...it's the WORLD Government(s) and everyone else ('cept her apparently) who are the living breathing organization(s) behind these plots.

My first thought was that she must be a college student...but apparently she is sort of employed. Sounds like LSD induced revelations to me.

"Patricia Neill is managing editor of a scholarly journal on the life and work of William Blake, the 18th-century artist and poet."
 
Well, many of the worlds governments are headed up by a single dictator. So their views, and theirs alone, actually do affect the direction of their nation's political agenda.

It makes much more sense for her to regard the general public as being part of this machine as well. My next argument against her would have been we all have a vote. So if the government is a big evil monster, we made it that way.

Nonetheless, everyone should always vote their conscience. Those who strategically vote for Republicans every time just so the Dems don't win will forever damn the Libertarian party, or any other 3rd party actually willing to change the direction of this nation, into a snowball's chance in hell of winning.

There is no mention of a two party system in the constitution. But American politics have, thus far, doomed us to only two parties: one wanting big government, and the other wanting a bigger government.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top