Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

SR Mag Primers w/223

Discussion in 'Handloading and Reloading' started by Maj Dad, Mar 22, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Maj Dad

    Maj Dad Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2005
    Messages:
    1,573
    Location:
    Carolina Low Country
    Does anyone have experience loading 55 gr (or 62) FMJ/Spire pts using SR mag primers & H335 (or other ball powders) in ARs? I picked up some CCI SR Mag primers today and thought I would use them with ball powders & see how they do. I have heard all the YOU'LL SHOOT YOUR EYE OUT, KID! arguments against them but I have used them with zero problems for years using basic, common-sense reloading technique. I am just looking for loads for these bullet weights with ball powders (I have lots of stick powders, but it's a pain in my Dillon 550 powder measure, or any progressive powder measure, for that matter). Please, I am not trying to ignite another flaming slug-fest over the lurking dangers of mag primers, just looking to load some more.
    Thanks to all, even you guys who would save my life ;)
    George J.
     
  2. jstein650

    jstein650 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2013
    Messages:
    552
    Location:
    Morganton, NC
    Sounds like you know what you're doing. Any ball powder load listed with standard primers, backed off by 1 gr, will give fine results. Work from there and I don't see a problem. I'm really not an AR guy, but from what I've read magnum primers have not been a problem in AR's.
    Incidentally, my single stage Lee adjustable measure gives me better thrown charges with small extruded powders. They just seem to fill the cavity better with no side 'leakage' out of the cylinder.
     
  3. Lj1941

    Lj1941 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2009
    Messages:
    845
    Location:
    Portland,PA
    Speer Data

    Speer data,at least the latest I have #12 almost always lists Mag primers with any ball powder. I really don't know if they still do this in their latest data.Personally I don't see the need for them in a small case like the 223. It sounds as if you are erring on the safe side- never a bad idea.:)
     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2013
  4. Maj Dad

    Maj Dad Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2005
    Messages:
    1,573
    Location:
    Carolina Low Country
    Thanks, gents - appreciate the time you took to reply. Lj1941, my Speer manual is about 25 years old & I haven''t looked at it, but if Speer recommends them, that's good enough for me to try them (like jstein650 said, backing off a grain or so just for the halibut). You're right, they're probably not really necessary in the 223, but if they are o.k. to use, I'll use them and see how they do.

    Just checked - my Speer manual is No. 11. I thought it was sorta new... ;-)
     
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2013
  5. NCsmitty

    NCsmitty Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,325
    Location:
    North Carolina
    I have always advocated using magnum primers when loading the older ball powders like H335, BLC2, Win 748, Win 760/H414. They can be harder to ignite, especially in colder northern climates. I believe that they offer more consistent ignition under all conditions with those powders. Magnum primers also have .005" thicker cups over standard as a rule, the same as BR primers.
    Work up your loads as normal, or drop your favorite load with standard primers by 5% and work up. You may just like them.
    I use H414 with CCI magnum primers with lighter bullets in my 6.5x55 M98.

    NCsmitty
     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2013
  6. climbnjump

    climbnjump Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Messages:
    416
    Location:
    Upper Midwest
    My Speer #14, which I think is the latest, also lists mag primers for H335.

    Slightly off-topic... I didn't realize that the #14 has become a collector's item.

    It can be had from Amazon for the low, low price of $428.98! Or only $194.34 if you don't mind "used".
     

    Attached Files:

  7. TheCracker

    TheCracker Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2011
    Messages:
    482
    Location:
    East Texas
    Im pretty sure the CCI military 5.56 primers (that have the thicker cups) are magnum primers.

    I would say just back down some and work up or better yet call the powder manufacturer. They will know for sure
     
  8. 788Ham

    788Ham Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2010
    Messages:
    3,206
    Location:
    Hills west of Denver
    Maj Dad,

    Thats all I use in my .223, CCI primers. I read an article some time back, said the mag primer gets the longer grained {3031} powders ignited better, all I've used since then, no problems.
     
  9. RNG

    RNG Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    85
    Location:
    South Carolina
    MajDad - Looking through my notes I had worked up a load some time ago(2008) using 25.0 H335 w/CCI450's, Winchester 55g FMJBT. Never chrony'd them but they were accurate out of my RRA w/18" varmint. Since then I've settled in on 26.5g w/748 for 55g and standard Win SR primers.

    I'm down here in Bft. Where in the LC are you located?

    Regards,
    Nick
     
  10. steve4102

    steve4102 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,439
    Location:
    Minnesota
    The CCI Military primers are indeed mag primers, so are Remington 7 1/2 primers.
     
  11. Maj Dad

    Maj Dad Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2005
    Messages:
    1,573
    Location:
    Carolina Low Country
    O.K., you guys have sold me - mag primers for ball powders for sure, and I will try them in stick powders & see how they do (like 45-70 & 3031 or 4198).

    Nick, I'm in Sumter - if you are familiar with it, I'm over past Sumter H.S. on the west side. Love your neck of the woods - used to live on St Simons Island, GA & miss the marsh. I use 25 gr H335 w/55 gr FMJs also - I will substitute the Mag primer in a few & see how they do.
    Thanks and cheers to all,
    George J.
     
  12. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    45,610
    Location:
    Alabama
    I used to use Federal 205 (Mag) primers with H335, IMR4895, and AA2015 in .222 Mag. Worked great. It's a near ballistic twin of .223. About 5% more case capacity IIRC.
     
  13. ArchAngelCD

    ArchAngelCD Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    21,674
    Location:
    Northeast PA, USA
    Like said above, CCI NATO primers are magnum strength according to Hodgdon. Many reloaders like using a magnum primer with ball powders especially in larger cases. The times dictate using what you can find but at least magnum primers with ball powders isn't counterproductive.
     
  14. FROGO207

    FROGO207 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2008
    Messages:
    6,140
    Location:
    Mount Desert Island Maine
    I have worked up loads with Magnum primers for most of my high volume ammo due to the last primer shortage and limited supplies. No problems with anything that was an eye opener but the standard versus magnum primers do require you work up the loads again though. You do have to be sure to work your load up again with each brand as well. I did not notice much difference in the load data with different brand magnum primers other than the Federal all were a slight bit hotter than all the others. Yes I feel it is a good idea to use MAG primers with ball propellants as a general rule anyway. YMMV
     
  15. steve4102

    steve4102 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,439
    Location:
    Minnesota
    It was my understanding that Fed makes Two small rifle primers. The 205 and the 205M.. neither are considered "Magnum"?

    The "M" stands for "Match" not Magnum. As in Fed 215=LR Magnum and 215M=LR Magnum Match, 210=LR and 210M=LR Match.
     
  16. Mr.Revolverguy

    Mr.Revolverguy Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    1,168
    WOW what is going on with Amazon and the Speer manual? Glad I own one already.

    Now back on topic utilizing h335 all I use is rifle magnum primers right out of the speer manual and I get great results.
     
  17. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    45,610
    Location:
    Alabama
    When I was working up loads in my .222 Mag I had Federal 200, 205, and 205M primers. It was my understanding, and perhaps I was wrong, that the 200 was a standard small rifle (And high velocity {I read as high pressure} pistol) primer, the 205 was a small rifle mag strength primer, and the 205M a mag strength Match small rifle primer. I have always remembered it that way.

    Anyone know what strength the fed small rifle primers are? Do they make another small rifle primer besides these I mentioned?

    [​IMG]
     

    Attached Files:

  18. TexasShooter59

    TexasShooter59 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    315
    Location:
    North Texas
    ^^^ What he said. I use the CCI41s in my AR loads with Win748. Bullets used are FMJ, Z-Max, and SPs. All Hornady 55 grain bullets.
     
  19. steve4102

    steve4102 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,439
    Location:
    Minnesota
    According to the "new" Federal primer box, the 200 is a Small Pistol Magnum primer.

    http://www.midwayusa.com/product/953676362/federal-small-pistol-magnum-primers-200

    The Fed 205 and 205M say Small Rifle with no indication of being a Mag primer. .
    http://www.midwayusa.com/product/953179134/federal-small-rifle-primers-205

    Federal Large Rifle primers clearly state on the package whether they are Magnum of not.

    The 210.
    http://www.midwayusa.com/product/953519190/federal-large-rifle-primers-210

    The 215 Magnum.
    http://www.midwayusa.com/product/953586171/federal-large-rifle-magnum-primers-215

    One could only assume that if the 205 was indeed a Mag primer the box/package would indicate so, similar to the Mag pistol and Mag Large rifle packaging.

    Primer chart. No Fed Small Rifle Mag Primers listed.
    http://www.handloads.com/misc/primers.asp

    http://www.grafs.com/catalog/tech-resource/technicalResourceId/6
     
  20. kingmt

    kingmt Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    3,593
    I've never seen a difference. CCI says that the need for Mag primers is to get the powder burning before the bullet gets to the lande. They did a stranded primer will kick the bullet into it then the powder lights & causes a pressure spike. I asked Hodgon about this & they said they were stupid & there is no problem using stranded primers.

    I guess you decide.
     
  21. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    45,610
    Location:
    Alabama
    In .222 Mag the 205 worked better than the 200. Yes, they list the 200 as a pistol primer now. I just wonder at the strength of the 205 vs another makers standard small rifle and small rifle mag primer now. Hmm. Maybe we should call Federal and ask.
     
  22. steve4102

    steve4102 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,439
    Location:
    Minnesota
  23. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    45,610
    Location:
    Alabama
    Looks pretty puny.
     
  24. Lennyjoe

    Lennyjoe Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    6,052
    Location:
    Southwestern Ohio
    I use CCI 450 primers with all of my 55 grain H335 loads for my .223 AR's
     
  25. Lennyjoe

    Lennyjoe Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    6,052
    Location:
    Southwestern Ohio
    But the funny thing is, I get better results using Winchester small rifle primers instead of CCI 450's and H335 out of my 6.8 SPC AR
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page