Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Stoeger cougar or Taurus 92

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by wambli_7, Mar 6, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. wambli_7

    wambli_7 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2008
    Messages:
    10
    Going to buy one tonight... what do you think is a better choice for a 9mm... the cougar or the 92... If I got the 92 it would be in SS.
     
  2. Princi

    Princi Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    Messages:
    243
    Location:
    DFW, Texas
    I have the Cougar and I really like it. However, I did have a hard time finding one. I also have a couple of 92's and I like the Cougar better, and it was less money too.

    I've seen a lot of 92's where the barrel will wiggle around at the muzzle even when locked up. The Cougar doesn't do that.
     
  3. PointOneSeven

    PointOneSeven Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2006
    Messages:
    169
    The rotating barrel on the cougar is pretty cool.

    But overall, the 92 is a little classier if you ask me, and maybe even a better candidate for launching 9mm projectiles.
     
  4. FieroCDSP

    FieroCDSP Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2006
    Messages:
    2,146
    Location:
    Wooster, Ohio
    The Cougar. I know the Stoegar is made on the same machines as the Beretta Cougar, so it's the same gun, with a different finish. I'm not sure about the Taurus, are they made on Beretta machines, or are they just licensed on the design?
     
  5. wheelgunslinger

    wheelgunslinger Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Messages:
    2,439
    Location:
    0 hours west of NC
    Chinese ninja monks can come into your home and disassemble the 92 while you're trying to shoot them with it.
    This has never happened with the Cougar.

    Plus, the Cougar is just cooler. I like the rotating barrel, ergonomics, and the way it handles.
     
  6. cherryriver

    cherryriver Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2006
    Messages:
    335
    Location:
    Northeastern Illinois
    Well, then, given the problems with Chinese ninja monks, I guess I'd put aside my 92 for home defense. But that's okay, since I still got my ol' Colt .45 for that stuff.
    I bought a 92 a few years ago really, really cheap, just looking for a beater autoloader, and found a sturdy, reliable, don't-worry-about-it kind of gun. I became a 92 convert. It's not super-accurate, but it goes bang every single time and doesn't care what sort of garbage is in the magazine.
    That's a pretty strong recommendation, coming from me.
    Bill
     
  7. Flopsy

    Flopsy Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Messages:
    351
    Wouldn't a sig or an XD be even easier for ninja monks to dismantle? Doesn't their pin just rotate down instead of having the button on the other side of the frame? Why are the monks always picking on the 92FS to screw with?

    Of course, I know the criticism is bunk, but I'm just wondering why the bogus criticism is hung on the Beretta instead of some other pistol. I guess there might not be any logic to it.
     
  8. cowssurf

    cowssurf Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2008
    Messages:
    219
    Location:
    Utah
    I just recently bought a Stoeger Cougar. I can't beleive what a deal it is. It's the exact same gun as the Beretta Cougar, but half the price. A local gun shop actually still sells a couple of the Beretta's brand new for twice as much. The Stoeger is right next to it and nobody knows there is no difference between the two. They were even selling a used beat up Beretta Cougar for the exact same price as the Stoeger. I've used Beretta mags in the gun with zero problems. Recoil feels like nothing at all. It's an unbeleivable deal.
     
  9. Black Knight

    Black Knight Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,439
    Location:
    Charlottesville, VA
    Stoeger is actually owned by Beretta. The Beretta family knows how to make money. They "sell" the Cougar design to a subsidiary in favor of their new Px4. They make money on all sides.
     
  10. Factfind

    Factfind Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2007
    Messages:
    33
    Location:
    Northeastern US
    All of my guns,rifles and pistols are made in the USA. Not a knock on foreign made guns, but rather a personal choice. I buy American when I have the choice.
     
  11. Seven©

    Seven© Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2008
    Messages:
    167
    Location:
    WNC
    I have a PT99 and a Cougar .40.

    I don't see how you could go wrong either way, but if you are ever considering using it for concealed carry I'd go with the Cougar.
     
  12. CU74

    CU74 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2006
    Messages:
    621
    Location:
    Kansas
    I don't own either, but I vote for the Cougar because my wife's "social work" gun is a 9mm Beretta Cougar.
     
  13. Quiet

    Quiet Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2007
    Messages:
    3,062
    Location:
    bouncing between the 909 & the 702
    Get the Stoeger Cougar it's a better gun than the Taurus PT-92.
     
  14. Glockorama

    Glockorama Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    249
    Location:
    Washington
    What he said.:)
     
  15. jhco

    jhco Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2007
    Messages:
    921
    Location:
    Lake City FL
    taurus is made on the same machines as the old modle 92 from beretta that hade the saftey on the frame so its the same as the old 92
     
  16. MPanova

    MPanova Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2006
    Messages:
    425
    Location:
    Houston TX
    If you plan on putting a lot of rounds through it and want to do so 40 years from now go with the PT92, it is built like a tank and will last forever through thousands and thousands of rounds, plus it looks better IMO
     
  17. grizz5675

    grizz5675 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2005
    Messages:
    125
    Location:
    Minnesota
    I have the pt99afs in 9mm and am buying the stoeger(on layaway) because the taurus is to big and clumsy.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page