Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Symantec blocks pro-gun sites

Discussion in 'Legal' started by GM7RQK, Nov 2, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. GM7RQK

    GM7RQK Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2003
    Messages:
    103
    Location:
    Sunny Scotland
    Seems that pro-gun websites are a 'risk' to the security of your computer

    The full discussion is available on Slashdot

    Soon I wont even be able to read about guns.
     
  2. Pilgrim

    Pilgrim Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,957
    Location:
    Nevada, escaped from the PDRK via Idaho.
    If I remember Internet Security, the blocked sites list can be modified to suit the needs of the user.

    Pilgrim
     
  3. Mike Irwin

    Mike Irwin Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    7,956
    Location:
    Below the Manson-Nixon line in Virginia...
    "If I remember Internet Security, the blocked sites list can be modified to suit the needs of the user."

    Not really the point.

    Microsoft's Web Sense filter, or whatever it's called, also blocks pro-gun sites, but leaves the anti-sites wide open.

    Interstingly, this is the ONLY firearms chatboard that's not blocked at my office.
     
  4. Moparmike

    Moparmike Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2003
    Messages:
    3,600
    Location:
    Oddly enough, a downwardly-plunging firey handbask
    Well, if you dont buy the product, then you arent actually supporting them. I have friends who have downloaded NIS 2003 Pro and use it. It is great, so I hear.
     
  5. DorGunR

    DorGunR Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    646
    Location:
    Maryland
    Dang.....I just paid for a 1 year update & extension on Norton.:(
     
  6. Jim March

    Jim March Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,732
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    Well, you CAN use it as a general firewall utility and turn off content blocking. But again, that's supporting jerks. Zonealarm is a better firewall if that's what you need.
     
  7. Peetmoss

    Peetmoss Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    604
    Location:
    Syracuse NY
    Sygate is also pretty good
     
  8. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    I don't do business with anti-Second Amendment bigots—and I bought the most recent version of Norton Utilities for the Macintosh, which turned out to be the old version, and didn't work, anyway. No more fakeware from Symantec for me!
     
  9. Fatcat

    Fatcat Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    109
    Location:
    Corvallis, OR
    No big surprise. This wouldn't be a big deal, except for the fact that so many public libraries use this on their systems.

    I'll second the recommendation for Zonealarm, if you're looking for a personal firewall.
     
  10. P12

    P12 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    327
    Location:
    Hewitt, TX
    Hmmmmm....maybe I'll make a trip to the library to do some research.
     
  11. Elmer Snerd

    Elmer Snerd Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Messages:
    337
    Location:
    TN
  12. jfh

    jfh Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2003
    Messages:
    4,866
    Location:
    Maple Plain, MN
    update on Symantec problems....

    earlier this week I tried to confirm this problem without downloading the software and testing it myself (since I currently don't have a testbench computer available; all are in use for the network). This kind of problem is, IMHO, among the most serious, for reasons cited previously--and for the bigger problem of "Internet information" and "what's reality." So...

    I followed Elmer's link to slashdot and reviewed the comments--then I called Symantec corporate offices and got directions to talk to support--I suffered through that routine, and I e-mailed the link on the corporate page.

    Today I got a an e-mail from a Symantec support specialist...and while it was nominally written in corporate-speak, it also appeared to be a sincere response. So, I first phoned the number she had included/left a message, then prepared an e-mail delineating the problem Symantec is facing...

    I received a phone call from this specialist within the hour, and she

    1) confirmed that the problem does exist--i.e., when you turn on Parental Controls, it will block the NRA and not block the Brady bunch, etc.,

    2) minimized it a bit in the form of the "all this software does it" argument--

    COMMENT: which I do suspect is true for ALL blocking software. Of course that's because the blocking keywords are too simplistic; these really have to be multi-level conditional keywords/rules to work even half-assed intelligently.

    3) she did state that traffic on this problem went up significantly this past week, and that they were working on it. (that's a summary; the comments were more extensive.)

    COMMENT I take this to mean that Symantec may well try to get going on what we would call the "next generation" software to market before anyone else.

    In summary, they are aware of a possible boycott/over this as a political problem, and they do NOT wish to get that going. Since the Rep is a shooter herself, I choose to believe her. But, it's still a question of "how long do we wait to see if the elephant can learn to tapdance."

    Jim H.
     
  13. GM7RQK

    GM7RQK Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2003
    Messages:
    103
    Location:
    Sunny Scotland
    And a big hand to JFH for his hard work.

    Thanks
     
  14. Art Eatman

    Art Eatman Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    43,284
    Location:
    Terlingua, TX; Thomasville,GA
    Yeah, a definite "Thanks!", Jim...

    Art
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page