Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Take III - Which NON-.308 "full-sized battle rifle" caliber poll thread

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow, Jul 29, 2009.

?

Which non-.308 caliber in a full sized "battle rifle" do you have or would you want?

  1. .22-250 or .22 Middlestead

    3 vote(s)
    3.2%
  2. .243 Win

    14 vote(s)
    15.1%
  3. 6mm Rem

    2 vote(s)
    2.2%
  4. .250 Savage

    3 vote(s)
    3.2%
  5. .260 Rem

    16 vote(s)
    17.2%
  6. 6.5 Creedmoor

    8 vote(s)
    8.6%
  7. 6x47mm Lapua

    7 vote(s)
    7.5%
  8. 6.5-.284 Norma

    6 vote(s)
    6.5%
  9. .270-08 wildcat

    3 vote(s)
    3.2%
  10. 7mm-08

    18 vote(s)
    19.4%
  11. .284 Win

    3 vote(s)
    3.2%
  12. .30 T/C

    2 vote(s)
    2.2%
  13. .300 RSAUM or other .300 short mag

    6 vote(s)
    6.5%
  14. 8mm-08 wildcat

    1 vote(s)
    1.1%
  15. .338 Federal

    17 vote(s)
    18.3%
  16. .358 Win

    3 vote(s)
    3.2%
  17. .375-08 wildcat

    1 vote(s)
    1.1%
  18. .450 Marlin

    3 vote(s)
    3.2%
  19. Other

    30 vote(s)
    32.3%
Multiple votes are allowed.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow

    Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Messages:
    13,146
    Take III - Which NON-.308 "full-sized battle rifle" caliber poll thread

    Last two were flawed/incomplete for various reasons, and there's no reason to limit it to AR10 types. Promise this will be the last one, even if I screw it up.

    So, BESIDES .308, which caliber have you already bought, or if not, would you be most likely to buy first, in an AR10, FAL, M14, G3 type, etc.?

    See poll. I allowed multiple choices this time.
     
    Last edited: Jul 29, 2009
  2. 10mm Mike

    10mm Mike Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    Messages:
    158
    Location:
    Central Arkansas
    I voted for the 7mm-08 and .338 Federal.

    Both have an abundance of different bullets available for those that reload, and there are is a pretty good choice of ammo available for them.
     
  3. P.B.Walsh

    P.B.Walsh Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,287
    Location:
    Tuscaloosa,Alabama
    .260-6.5 Norma, I like the 6mm's. :)
     
  4. Dr.Rob

    Dr.Rob Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    14,501
    Location:
    Centennial, CO
    I'd like one of those Ohio Ordnance 1918A3's in .30-06

    If you're gonna go heavy, go all the way!
     
  5. FlyinBryan

    FlyinBryan Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2008
    Messages:
    2,795
    Location:
    TEXAS
    i had to vote other because mine would be 30-06.

    i wasnt sure what you meant by "non 308 caliber" because technically the 30-06 is in fact 308 caliber, but then again so is 300 rsaum and other 300 short mags and you had them as options so i figure im good choosing the 30-06, except that i didnt see it on the list.

    so i voted other, and my favorite full sized battle rifle is the m1 garand in 30-06.

    im sorry if that messes it up, but i figured that i should put it since its true for me.

    bryan
     
  6. Kind of Blued

    Kind of Blued Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Messages:
    3,676
    Location:
    Rocky Mountains
    "Battle rifle" implies shooting bad guys to me, and whether true or not, it makes me think "semi-auto". While something like the .375-08 is intriguing in a less cumbersome hunting rifle, I think that lighter and faster makes more sense for human targets.

    I chose .243 and .260, but my choices would be different if some of those 6mm and 6.5mm cartridges were more widely used. If I were to buy a semi-auto MBR, I would want it chambered for something which can be either purchased or reloaded on the cheap, because you know it'll be tons of fun to shoot at the range.
     
  7. jmabbott888@aol.com

    jmabbott888@aol.com Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2007
    Messages:
    101
    Location:
    Bakersfield, Ca
    Had to pick the 250 Sav since it was listed. Great little cartridge, accurate, low recoil & if you can hit what you want every time it's alot better than a cannon you can't hit anything with.
     
  8. Frankl03

    Frankl03 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2008
    Messages:
    711
    Location:
    Kansas City, MO
    I believe its a flawed premise when there are so many 308 battle rifles such as the FAL, M1A, G3, Ar10, Saiga, Galil,

    The one non 308 I can think of is 30-06 as in the M1 Garand.
     
  9. jpwilly

    jpwilly Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,892
    Location:
    Phoenix AZ
    .260 Rem how about the .276 Perderson!
     
  10. AgentAdam

    AgentAdam Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    439
    Theirs the new .300 OSSM (.300 Olympic Super Short Mag)
     
  11. Gelgoog

    Gelgoog Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    Messages:
    600
    7x57 Venezualean FN-49 baby!!
     
  12. JimmAr

    JimmAr Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2008
    Messages:
    224
    good ol' 8mm mauser
     
  13. Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow

    Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Messages:
    13,146
    It's not a "flawed premise". It's a "question". And I don't think it could be much clearer. However, for the benefit of those who don't yet understand the question, I'll try to clarify.

    *IF* you have bought a semi-auto "EBR" in a non-.308 caliber, then which one was it? If you have not bought a semi-auto "EBR" in a non-.308 caliber, then which one, if any non-.308 caliber, do you want, plan to buy, or would be most likely to buy, first?

    If you didn't know, DPMS, DS Arms, and several others make non-.308 "EBRs" or "battle rifles".

    If the answer is none, don't vote. Don't choose "other" for .308 - that's not the question.

    Guys, you cannot pick 8mm mauser, .30-06, 7x57 mauser, or any other "long action" caliber. This question is intended to be limited to "standard" length calibers that will go into existing magwells/platforms.
     
  14. H2O MAN

    H2O MAN member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    2,438
    Location:
    USA
    I agree with FlyinBryan, make mine .30-06 or leave it .308



    If you start a poll with "other" as a choice you have to expect all
    sorts of answers that you may not want or agree with. That's life.
     
  15. FlyinBryan

    FlyinBryan Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2008
    Messages:
    2,795
    Location:
    TEXAS
    am i correct in presuming that when you say "non 308 caliber" that you mean non 308 winchester cartidge firing?

    if you mean non 308 caliber then my choice would have to change.

    i figured you meant non 308 winchester cartridge firing because you actually have a couple of 308 caliber cartridges listed.
     
  16. Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow

    Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Messages:
    13,146
    Yes, I mean "non-.308 win". Which I thought was obvious by my inclusion of .30 T/C and .300 RSAUM in the poll.

    H2O, in my post immediately above yours, I specified that it needs to be short action cartridge, and specifically that .30-06 is not a valid choice. Thanks.
     
  17. FlyinBryan

    FlyinBryan Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2008
    Messages:
    2,795
    Location:
    TEXAS
    my apoligies, i had already posted 30-06.

    since its excluded i would pick the 338 federal so instead of being 8 votes it would be 9.

    sorry
     
  18. H2O MAN

    H2O MAN member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    2,438
    Location:
    USA
    I was still typing my response when you posted your revised specifications.

    I feel that your never-ending polls are not valid because you have not yet
    been able to focus your attention on what it is that you are looking for specifically.

    Good luck with poll number 4.
     
  19. Jason_G

    Jason_G Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2007
    Messages:
    1,874
    Location:
    Louisiana
    I'm confused by the fact that only one person has picked 6mm Rem, but several have picked .243 Win. 6mm is roughly the same size cartridge, exact same projectile, and has more umph.


    Jason
     
  20. Jmurman

    Jmurman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    661
    Location:
    MD
    M1 Garand, 30-06 is mine
     
  21. Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow

    Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Messages:
    13,146
    Define "valid". Is it any more or less "valid" than the thread I just posted in that said "Man I sure wish CZ would make a revolver", with other people saying "yep"? But you are correct about the never-ending part. If I post a couple of polls per month consistently through the next coming years - well, all I can say is......the horror - THE HORROR!!!

    No, you are quite incorrect. It is focused on exactly what I want it to answer. How would you know what I'm trying to answer? And what would make you think it's something different from what I actually asked? The ONLY way it doesn't answer what I want it to answer is when people don't read the question or make up their own question, and respond to that, as some have done.

    As I said clearly above in my post #1, this is the last one no matter what. Guess maybe you were posting your post at the same time I was posting post #1 too - perhaps you have a slow computer.
     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2009
  22. rbernie
    • Contributing Member

    rbernie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    20,450
    Location:
    Norra Texas
    He's just frustrated that you didn't give him a legitimate reason to post yet another picture of his beloved M1As. :)

    I decided that my final choice was 358 Win. If I'm going to carry the weight of an AR10 instead of my AR15s, it better do something that my AR15 can't do. Since I can have 6.5 Grendel, 6.8SPC, 7.62x39, 458 SOCOM, and other such AR15s, I decided that only the 200+ yard bigger bore options really differentiated the AR10 platform from the smaller one.

    I would define my use for this platform as sporting use, field carried, shots taken inside of 400 yards, suitable for any two or four-legged critter smaller than bear.
     
  23. MikeKeyW

    MikeKeyW Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2008
    Messages:
    116
    I love my 7mm-08's, especially my 18.5" 788 Remmie
     
  24. Float Pilot

    Float Pilot Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,093
    Location:
    Kachemak Bay Alaska
    Hmm lets see.

    1. Battle rifle, ie military use. So all the big bore hunting cartridges need not apply. Unless you were talking about an all around survival type rifle.

    2. Battle rifle implies more than an assault rifle (intermediate) round.

    So we have some factors to review.

    A. There is no set rifle action size so we can come up with anything and then build a rifle around it.

    B. Reliablity, it must work in a semi auto action and load all the time.

    C Weight of ammunition is a prime concern. This is a battle rifle and not a bear hunting rifle. You need to haul around a real battle load in field conditions all day every day. Not see how much you can pose with in your mom's basement.

    D.Recoil. You have to figure for all sorts of different size troops.

    E Space. How much room the ammunition consumes in magaziens and ammo cans.

    F Anti personnel /material effectiveness. The ballance of what your troops can carry and fire versus what effect it has on the enemy. While an exploding 458 Win Mag does lots of damage, it is not practical. Just as a troop could also carry 2,000 rounds of 22lr ammo without being much of a major threat on the battle field. So the best round for killing is not going to be the best round to carry.

    So...

    ***22-250. Basically a 250 Savage case necked down. A great varmint cartridge but is rough on barrel life and would not lend itself to anti material work unless it was slowed down and loaded with heavier bullets. Then you end up with a 5.56mm again.

    ***6x47mm, also known as the 6mm x 222mag, About the same as a 6mm x223. While slightly better than a 5.56mm, it probably falls into the intermediate cartridge group.

    ***6mm Rem aka 244 Remington. While slightly betetr than the 243 Win. it has a longer case.


    ***243 Win and 260 Rem. 6mm and 6.5mm. Both based upon the 308 case. Better for weight considerations but about the same in space consumption.
    Both have good downrange trajectory and enough impact damage for 250 pound living targets.


    ***250 Savage also known as the 250-3000. This case is 48.56mm long (1.912 inches) Generally a good all around cartridge that was years ahead of it's time. Would offer some weight and size advantages over the 308 based cartridges. Would not have the long range performance of the 6.5mm weapons but would offer more power then a 5.56mm.


    *** 7mm-08. Another round based on the 308 case with a 51.18mm (2.015 inch) long case. Not different enough from the 7.62 NATO to bother spending any money on mass produced military rifles. May offer some slight savings in weight.


    ***7.62 NATO, (308) seems to work just fine, but space and weight considerations have been working against it for 50 years.


    ***30-06 and larger, too big and too much recoil for military purposes only. There is a reason they invented the 7.62 NATO.

    *** Dual use hunting: The 338 Federal and the 358 Winchester. Both these offer a large game hunting edge in a 308 size package. The 358 Winchester having the edge with heavier bullets. Both are good cartridges out to 300 yards. Ammunition weight now becomes a major concern.






    22-250 or .22 Middlestead.......... Nope
    .243 Win............ good
    6mm Rem..........nope
    .250 Savage......good
    .260 Rem...........very good
    6.5 Creedmoor........Nope, not good in shorter barrels
    6x47mm Lapua.........why bother?
    6.5-.284 Norma..... too big in diameter, short barrel life
    .270-08 wildcat.......just get a 7mm-08
    7mm-08...........not as good as the 260 rem
    .284 Win........Too big in diameter
    .30 T/C.............not in an auto loader
    .300 RSAUM or other .300 short mag... not good for auto loaders, too big in diameter.
    8mm-08 wildcat.......why get a .323 bullet when you can get a .338 Fed.
    .338 Federal......Ok for game critters.
    .358 Win..........very good for game critters.
    .375-08 wildcat.... nope.
    .450 Marlin..... being attacked by zombie bears? this would be rough on weight and on the rifle action.
    Other
     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2009
  25. FlyinBryan

    FlyinBryan Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2008
    Messages:
    2,795
    Location:
    TEXAS
    ask any ww2 vet if their rifles were too powerful.

    ya, and there is a reason that trojan makes an ultra slim fit too but that doesnt mean they are right for all of us.:neener::neener:
     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2009
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page