Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Tangent sight on Belgian Hi-Power

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Cannonball888, May 24, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Cannonball888

    Cannonball888 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2007
    Messages:
    2,172
    Location:
    Florida
    Anyone else think these a bit over the top?

    Did they really expect to hit someone at 500 meters? :rolleyes:

    [​IMG]
     
  2. kentucky_smith

    kentucky_smith Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,686
    Ah, the El Capitan.
     
  3. cluttonfred

    cluttonfred Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    1,128
    Location:
    Nairobi, Kenya
    Does yours have the slot in the butt for the shoulder stock? I think that was the point--area fire just to make the bad guys take cover.
     
  4. GRIZ22

    GRIZ22 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    5,035
    Mausers, Enfields, Springfields have sights graduated to 2000 meters/yards. Area fire can be an effective tactic. You kept the enemy from moving freely and would kill or wound with a lucky shot.
     
  5. Cliff47

    Cliff47 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2003
    Messages:
    799
    Location:
    Washington State
    With the under 5-inch barrel on the Hi-Power, I consider the 500-meter notch a tad optimistic. Though lobbing a round in on someone, will get their attention.
     
  6. absolute0

    absolute0 Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    487
    Location:
    Zimmerman, MN
    Regardless of function they LOOK COOL
     
  7. Dienekes

    Dienekes Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,905
    Location:
    Wyoming
    As the proud owner (and user) of a tangent sighted Inglis HP, I think I can say no. Stevens comments in his book that FN in the 1930s thought it was a pointless frill, but kept it as an option for purchasers who couldn't live without it.:scrutiny:

    Reportedly the Chinese of all political persuasions loved them. They probably should have named them "The Warlord Special". :neener:
     
  8. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
    Indirect Fire perhaps? :D

    rcmodel
     
  9. dagger dog

    dagger dog Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
    Messages:
    2,695
    Location:
    SO. IN
    With the enemy at 500 meters and the full 13 rnd mag you could give 'em a squirt to keep their heads down, then have time to reload a fresh mag before they over ran you.
    By the next mag they would be close enough, you might be able to get a few rnds where it counts , the shoulder stock would increase the chances.
     
  10. Old Fuff

    Old Fuff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    23,908
    Location:
    Arizona
    Just for the record:

    Back in the 1880's the U.S. Army's manual covering the 1873 Colt .45 Revolver had trajectory tables going out to 1000 yards! :what:

    Obviously some of today's shooters can't measure up to those old-timey troopers. Tis sad to see how marksmanship has declined... :neener:

    Of course the Army's intent was to (literally) drop slugs on concentrations of enemy troop at that distance.

    I suspect that Fabrique Nationale had the same idea. It worked for the Mauser 1896, and the Browning p-35's that came with the tangent rear sight also had a detachable shoulder stock.

    Also some experiments were conducted with the first S&W .357 Magnums on a single silhouette target at 600 yards. Oh, and they did hit it. Also for the record, the Army tested both a .357 S&W and Colt 1911A1 with detachable shoulder stocks. Don't think they were limited to 15 yards either.
     
  11. BHPshooter

    BHPshooter Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    3,451
    Location:
    Utah
    Actually, the earliest tangent-sighted Hi Powers had graduations out to 1000 meters.

    If it's slotted for a shoulder stock, I don't think it's unreasonable. Otherwise, it's still a cool contraption to experiment with at the range. I imagine you'd find certain loads that hit better close-range, and some that hit better at the longer ranges.

    Wes
     
  12. Just Jim

    Just Jim Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Messages:
    1,099
    The only way to know for sure is to try them out. Looks like it would be fun.

    jj
     
  13. Moonclip

    Moonclip Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    2,766
    Location:
    USA
    I've always liked the tangent sight on a BHP but have yet to have owned one. I haven't tried too much 500yd shooting with a hnadgun byt it can be done, I think Elmer keith wrote of it.

    I've surprised myself at 100 yards or sometimes farther here and there.
     
  14. RCouch

    RCouch Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Messages:
    205
    Don't believe anyone would consider it accurate, but only for elevation. As stated above, for broad scatter fire.
     
  15. Jon Coppenbarger

    Jon Coppenbarger Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,281
    Location:
    co
    I shot my inglis hi power at 600 yards a few years ago. It also had the stock on it. Only shot one mag and had someone looking threw a spotting scope to tell me where the impacts were. Out of a mag I had one hit on a nra highpower target. Did not have anyone in the pits as I did not want one coming in on the concrete wall and bouncing back.

    Fun.
     
  16. wristtwister

    wristtwister Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2008
    Messages:
    419
    Just a suggestion

    I would suggest that the range of the weapon is actually how far the bullet travels... and for "aimed fire", there is only a limited range of accuracy. If you shoot any gun long enough, you could learn how much windage, drop, etc. that you had to employ for shooting any cartridge long range, but essentially you're "lobbing them in" at the extreme ranges of the weapon.

    There's a reason they put longer barrels on rifles... longer sight pattern for higher ballistics and longer ranges. Pistols are more "short and medium range" weapons, and unless someone thinks they're capable of accurately hitting targets at the extreme ranges of the cartridge they're using, and practice to accomplish that goal, it makes more sense to employ the right weapon for the needed firepower.

    I have different weapons for different purposes, and if I have a 300 yard shot to make, I'll use my 7.62 x 39 or .300 win mag... not my 9mm pistol... and unless the target is larger than "man sized", even that range would require some skill. I shoot pretty well for an old ex-LEO with bad eyes, but "range requirements" for weapons are pretty standard unless you're in a war zone.
    Over 50 yards, I'd start looking for a long gun to make my shots... and while I've done some good shooting with pistols, I know and understand their limitations.

    If all I wanted to do was keep their heads down, my 9mm would do fine... it has 18 rounds and lots of spare clips... but for long range accuracy... pick a better choice of weapons. The first thing I learned as a cop was that "bravado will get you killed"... so don't underestimate your adversary. They may be shooting back with the right kind of weapon... a long gun at extended ranges... so then, who's range choice is important?

    Your choice of weapons is based on whether you're dodging bullets yourself at longer ranges... so, like cigs, "smok'em if you got'em"...

    WT
     
  17. dispatch

    dispatch Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    344
    Location:
    DFW area
    Nope- I'm not going to hit anything a 500 meters with any handgun. BUT- I'll not replace the tanget sights on my High Power. I can still hit with it at 7 yards.
     
  18. Vern Humphrey

    Vern Humphrey Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    18,502
    Location:
    Deep in the Ozarks
    The problem with most shoulder stock designs for handguns is that they are modeled on rifle buttstocks, and place the sights too close to the eye. A better design would put the gun at arm's length, and have a comb that allowed the shooter a "heads up" stance.
     
  19. Cliff47

    Cliff47 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2003
    Messages:
    799
    Location:
    Washington State
    One more thing about the buttstock, it puts a nice resonance chamber under your right ear. Just the thing to leave your ears ringing after a magazine or two. Clever design, that.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page