Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Tapco for an AK, what is the consensus?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by jon_in_wv, Jul 29, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jon_in_wv

    jon_in_wv Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    3,816
    Alright, I'm sure this has been done before. But I would like an adjustable stock for my Saiga AK to replace the KVAR stock that is currently on it. What is the deal. Is the Tapco T6 stock crap or not?!?! I hear so much conflicting crap. If you HAVE one, what do you think of it? How sturdy is it? Or is it worth getting a good adapter and installing a AR15 stock instead? I love my Saiga but the KVAR stock on it isn't the greatest and I would like the adjust ability of the M4 style stock and a rubber butt pad for more secure shooting. Let me know what you think.
     
  2. Z-Michigan

    Z-Michigan Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    4,047
    Location:
    Michigan
    I have one but it's not yet installed. It's O-K, not great. Personally I would learn to live with a fixed length stock. If you must have adjustable and want quality, I'd get the AR stock adapter.
     
  3. vit

    vit Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Messages:
    93
    Location:
    SE WI
    I had the adapter and it sucked, cheek weld was too high and I couldn't even get my head low enough to see irons. The T-4 is angled down and is a bit better in this regard, but the position of your head changes as you change stock length.
     
  4. Maverick223

    Maverick223 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    11,269
    Location:
    28078
    I DO NOT have one, but the ones I have played with felt really flimsy. I have not actually seen one break, but I got the impression that I wouldn't have to try hard to do so. :)
     
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2009
  5. nalioth

    nalioth Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2007
    Messages:
    5,841
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    One gets what one pays for.

    Yes, they're lifetime warranted, but . . .
     
  6. jon_in_wv

    jon_in_wv Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    3,816
    Ace sells as adapter that looks like its steel or aluminum. It looks pretty sturdy. Its $50 bucks and a AR stock should be cheap enough to score. Do you think that would be a better deal?
     
  7. Maverick223

    Maverick223 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    11,269
    Location:
    28078
    Not familiar with the Ace that you are referring to (do you mind linking to it?)...but the following links include a couple examples of retrofit kits (not complete) with aluminum tubes... Vltor & CAA. I haven't actually seen either of the above but they appear to be well constructed, however they don't come cheap. :)
     
  8. THE DARK KNIGHT

    THE DARK KNIGHT Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2009
    Messages:
    1,550
    Location:
    NJ
    The TAPCO stock is inferior to the KVAR. If you want a quality adjustable stock, get the adapter. The TAPCO one is just cheesy.
     
  9. benEzra

    benEzra Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    8,575
    Location:
    Down East in NC
    There are a lot of people over on Warrior Talk who run AK's hard, and the consensus over there seems to be that the Tapco stock is a little fragile, with the Ace adapter + a regular AR stock being a better approach.

    Having said that, if you do not foresee having to whack things with the butt of the rifle or doing a lot of climbing, jumping, or tumbling with it, then that may not be an issue for you.

    I do have a Tapco Galil-style forend on my own AK, so I don't have anything against Tapco, BTW. I have a Romanian sidefolder buttstock, though.
     
  10. jon_in_wv

    jon_in_wv Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    3,816
    My AK is in my possession just for the things I DON"T forsee. So I want it set up for hard use.

    I plan on getting on of the new intrafuse hand guards for mine..
     
  11. SimpleIsGood229

    SimpleIsGood229 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2008
    Messages:
    934
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    I have the T-6 on my Saiga, but I really don't like it due to the drop (as vit mentioned above). I simply cannot get a good cheek weld with this setup. I would definitely go with the Vltor (milspec diameter) or CAA (commercial diameter) one-piece block/tube.

    I figured I would save some money by getting the Tapco T-6/Magpul CTR combo from AIM Surplus for $111.11. As it turns out, I should have sprung for the Vltor block/tube in the first place (like I knew I should have in the first place). :rolleyes:
     
  12. Maverick223

    Maverick223 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    11,269
    Location:
    28078
    What you want is a Ace Skeleton Stock ...with or without a folding mechanism...they are built really well and are reasonably priced...not adjustable but available in different LOPs and it can be set up to fold. :)
     
  13. Mr.510

    Mr.510 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2007
    Messages:
    485
    Location:
    Belfair Washington
    +1 to what Maverick223 said.

    I've got an Ace stock on my .308 with the folder and it is STOUT. You could lay the rifle over a ditch and stand on the middle. You never know when you may need to use your Saiga as a bridge, crowbar, or fencepost! :cool:

    Unless you *need* adjustable length I'd skip it. It's more stuff to break when you whack somethin' upside the head. Plus with a folder the gun will fit in a violin case or backpack for those Discreet Ops. I'm not a fan of plastic stocks on AKs and the Crapco T6 is the flimsiest I've tried.
     
  14. Deus Machina

    Deus Machina Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    2,206
    Location:
    Brandon, Florida
    I've got one, and it's not so bad. Doesn't allow a firm cheek weld, but that could change with a stock saddle. Tougher than the imported M4-style stocks you find in those kits.

    Wouldn't whack someone with it, though.

    I'm still keeping an eye out for a good deal on a folder, but the Tapco's just fine for now.
     
  15. theotherwaldo

    theotherwaldo Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2008
    Messages:
    2,047
    Location:
    In the Wild Horse Desert of Texas
    What's wrong with wood?

    I thought about putting a 4-position on my AK, then I had to stop and cool off.

    I don't wear body armor. It's too hot here to wear heavy clothing. I have other stuff for truck guns.

    So why an adjustable stock? I decided to add a stock pad extension and leave it at that. No added rattle, no cheek weld problems.

    Sturdy.
     
  16. Glockman17366

    Glockman17366 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2005
    Messages:
    1,150
    Location:
    South Central Pennsylvania
    Personally, I'd leave the rifle stock (meaning the original wood furniture). If you have a thumbhole stock, go with a decent used or new AK style stock set.
    Don't forget the 922r compliance if you go this way.

    I did convert from a thumbhole stock to a sidefolder a few years back. It was a bit more difficult to get all the compliance parts then, but it was doable.
     
  17. jon_in_wv

    jon_in_wv Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    3,816
    Mine currently has the KVAR stock, as I mentioned above, it never had wood furniture. I also have the plastic grip and handguard. I understand the preference for wood, but its not happening on this one so wood is a moot point.

    I do like the ace tubular stock. The folder would help also but I'm afraid it would be really bulky when its folded up. I'm really just going for some versatility. I would like to shorten it up for closer quarters but still have the option of a longer stock when shooting where there is more room. The M4 style stock seems to work well enough for the troops. I haven't heard any cry to replace them with solid stocks that won't break.
     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2009
  18. Maverick223

    Maverick223 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    11,269
    Location:
    28078
    :eek: But I want curly walnut on it (crying in the corner).

    If you really want a collapsible stock (and it sounds like you do) I would go with one of Al. tubes that I mentioned above. These look to be reasonably durable (but I wouldn't use it for a pull-up bar) and will give you the ability to shorten it when desired. :)
     
  19. Lone_Sheep_Dog

    Lone_Sheep_Dog Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2009
    Messages:
    162
    Location:
    Georgia
    I have one on my WASR10. The dealer installed it before I bought it. I like it. I think the wood stock is too short. The tapco seems pretty solid. I think it looks cool too.
     
  20. jojo200517

    jojo200517 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2009
    Messages:
    580
    Got one on mine. While it does have a smidge of wiggle and play its tough material and I don't see it breaking provided i don't try using it to break down doors or something insane. As for the cheek weld, i'm glad it's low now I can float my head where I want it like I shoot everything else.

    ONLY negative thing I have to say about it is I had to give up my place for my cleaning kit.

    Really a butt pad? on an ak? The back end of the tapco's are no worse than the steel plate on the rear of the original wood. I do plan on keeping and refinishing my wooden stock set that came on mine but for now I like the all black look I have going.
     
  21. Maverick223

    Maverick223 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    11,269
    Location:
    28078
    As alluring as that sounds I think I'll keep my cheek weld...even for the lowly inaccurate AK. :)
     
  22. jon_in_wv

    jon_in_wv Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    3,816
    How sturdy is the ACE folding mechanism? I found a YouTube video of a review of the robinson armament folder and it made me really consider the one from Ace.
     
  23. Maverick223

    Maverick223 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    11,269
    Location:
    28078
    I don't know about the standard folder...but the push-button folder is very solid. Solid enough for me to trust it to hold about 2000lbs without collapsing or breaking. It is much stronger than any other folding mechanism that I have seen. The only problem that I have found with it is that it has a slight it of movement when open (or closed). The included set screw did not completely solve the problem...at least for me. I solved the issue by using a nylon set screw that would be crushed slightly when the stock is fully opened. :)
     
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2009
  24. Cactus Jack Arizona

    Cactus Jack Arizona Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    640
    Location:
    Southwest MO
    Personally, I don't like the T6 stock for the AK. It makes the AK look cheap and flimsy. Of course, I'm a bit of a traditionalist and I believe the stocks on all AK-47s should be wood, especially with wood Dragunov stocks. :neener:
     
  25. Maverick223

    Maverick223 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    11,269
    Location:
    28078
    I am a bit of a traditionalist also...I believe that the Dragunov stock should be reserved for Dragunovs. :neener:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page