Taurus 856 , My Experience

Status
Not open for further replies.

Waveski

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2014
Messages
3,176
Location
43 north
Backstory :
Spouse wanted a simple house/ car sd piece. She wanted a laser. Shooting experience is minimal. Simple = revolver. I learned that Taurus had upgraded the .38 special m.85 to a 6 shot 856 , and there was an optional stock laser. BUT - could not find a laser equipped example for sale anywhere. So , looking at non- Laser ones I learned that there is a 3" option called the Defender , and it has a night sight with bright orange outline. That's what we ordered , for just under $400.

So , I was expecting a somewhat heavy trigger , but I must say it was heavier than I thought . Double action was tickling 13# ... surprisingly smooth, and with almost no stacking , and a decent break , but heavy. There was absolutely no way the intended user was going to master that trigger. Wolff now offer an 856 specific spring kit. No coil cutting required. After running about 150 rounds through the revolver with the stock springs I installed the replacements. Videos suggested that I should expect great results , I an skeptical by nature - but great results is what I got. The enormously heavy da trigger came down to approx 8.5#. That deserves an exclamation point ... 8.5# ! Too good to be true , I thought as I selected a variety of ammunition and headed out to the range.

After several short range trips (very cold up here) I am up to about 250 rounds without any issues. The before/after primer prints are slightly different , but nowheres near proportionate to the difference in trigger pull. Primer strikes are consistent. The trigger is now as light as my S&W 60 which has thousands of rounds and a trip to a good 'smith in it's service. I would not say that the Taurus trigger is as good as the Smith ; they have very different characteristics. I would say that the Taurus trigger is better that I thought possible. Slippery , kind of.

So , here's what I have , and what I think ---
The 6 shot version of the Taurus 85 has a cylinder that is 1/10" wider than the 5 shot. .1 inch for an additional round is a good deal. The frame size is between a J frame and K frame , a bit closer to the J. The 3 inch version - bead blasted stainless - is not light at 30+ oz. That's ok by me because it makes for very mild recoil , and that translates to pleasant shooting experience , and THAT translates to successfully getting my spouse to practice. The 3" barrel points easily and naturally ; the bright front sight is very effective (compared to the standard ramp on the 2"). Putting sots into a silhouette at 15 yards in double action is easy.

Negatives: The stock trigger is excessively heavy. Anyone that maintains that it is unacceptable for a firearm to require work right out of the box has a legitimate point , but I went in with eyes wide open. $14 and 35 minutes of bench time is all it took.
The texture of the bead blasted ss is too rough. It is a dirt magnet. I see no advantage to that texture , it would be better if a finer medium had been used.
There are a few sharp edges. Easy to fix with that finish. It's not like I'm taking an emery board to a Python.

Bottom line:
For 4 bills I have a compact 6 shooter with an 8.5# trigger , a revolver that can be shoved under a seat or in the glovebox along with a flashlight and other miscellanea without worrying about a ding or a scratch. It is a joy to shoot and accuracy seems just fine.
I am SO happy that I could not find a laser equipped 856 , because then we would have a 2" bbl and a ramp sight. The longer barrel and bright front sight makes target acquisition pretty much automatic. We can always add a laser.
I think that with Taurus there are good ones and not so good ones ; I have a good one , a very good one. Service ... well , who knows.

The summary is - I could not be happier with how this venture turned out.

Signed ,
A Smith and Wesson Guy
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3141.jpg
    IMG_3141.jpg
    99.3 KB · Views: 114
  • IMG_3142.jpg
    IMG_3142.jpg
    99.2 KB · Views: 111
  • IMG_3144.jpg
    IMG_3144.jpg
    180.9 KB · Views: 122
Nice handy revolver that doesn't break the bank. Thanks for the review, I'd give one a try.
Taurus triggers are hit and miss, I've got a Taurus gaucho (SA) and I doubt the trigger pull is even 8-10 oz- either way, under 1#. Hammer doesn't push off surprisingly but it will sneak up on you which I consider a fault.
 
Great job!

Nothing wrong with getting a good .38 Special tuned-up for defense, regardless of the screeching from the flying monkeys of 9mm polystriker cabal.

They key to success with Taurus is examining the EXACT gun your are going to purchase with a detailed assessment (lock-up, end-shake, cylinder gap, binding, push-off, etc). I have a blued 605 .357 and an all-titanium .44 special snubs. Both are excellent, and were acquired on the used market for very fair prices.
 
Last edited:
From 1 S&W fan to another, and I have quite a few, I also like Taurus revolvers ALOT.
I carry an 85 UL every day and there are several more Taurus in the safe as well.
I have never had a problem with Taurus CS and I'm a firm believer that their revolvers are very under rated.
I'm glad you got one that you like and I hope your wife likes it too.
 
I got a pistol laser for Christmas and have also shot the Sig 320c with a Romeo and have found them not to be all that great. Biggest problem is to hold the laser on the bull. I rather have a quick point with the front site and call it good. Too much time is wasted lining up the laser.
 
I got a pistol laser for Christmas and have also shot the Sig 320c with a Romeo and have found them not to be all that great. Biggest problem is to hold the laser on the bull. I rather have a quick point with the front site and call it good. Too much time is wasted lining up the laser.

A quick point is what I do with a laser. Cover the target, pull the trigger. I don't use a laser for small target shooting.

The biggest help in me doing better with a laser is dry firing at home with snap caps. Lots of low light practice to be had at home in the evenings around here.
 
52D8AFD4-9E2B-4DD7-9DDA-A3A421276C4F.jpeg
Basically the same size as a Charter Bulldog &
Ruger SP101 ... I use the same holsters
The trigger is heavy .. not as heavy as my stock 642 trigger .. goes bang every-time...great carry option
When the world returns and my hospital bills are paid .. Im getting a 3 inch barreled UL version... maybe two
 
Waveski

Thanks for the comprehensive and open-minded write-up on your Taurus 856. The 3" barrel, front night sight, and the extra round in the cylinder should go a long way in making this gun a great choice for home defense.
 
Additional comments :

One detail I neglected to mention in the 856 plus column - This new revolver has no Taurus safety lock - no hammer lock screw , no nuthin'. Internal safety locks of any kind are generally a deal breaker for me. I was willing to compromise and grudgingly accept the hammer screw in order to get the 6 shot 3" , but to pleasant surprise - nothing!

Next item - Upon evaluating the slightly larger frame and cylinder of the 856 I came to the conclusion that Taurus made a very good marketing move. There is a huge gap between a J frame and a K frame. Many folks feel that a J frame is too small to shoot well (myself excluded) ; most feel that a K frame is too large to easily carry and conceal. Colt fills that gap as does Ruger. I've always thought that Taurus targets the S&W market - similar revolver at a lower price. In my opinion , and admittedly with the advantage of hindsight , Smith & Wesson should have developed a mid-size frame a long time ago. I own a very nice S&W Military & Police 2" snub. Many times I have considered carrying it. My preferred carry is IWB; carrying the K frame that way is a bit of a stretch.

Somebody at Taurus went barking up the right tree.
 
I have owned several Taurus revolvers in the past and never had any trouble with any of them. Especially the model 85 and model 82 guns. I have a Tracker in 44 mag I wish I had never sold but have a brand new one bid on at Gunbroker. I will know if I'm the winner in 4 days.

Sounds like you found the perfect gun for your needs.:thumbup:
 
@Waveski
Thank you for that report. I saw an 856 with a 2” barrel for sale at a gunsmith shop recently and the gent I was speaking with said they made a 3” version, which interested me quite a bit. Here in CA we only have options from guns on “the roster” so I looked up what was available and the 2 links below are the 3” revolvers we can purchase in the 856 family. There are more 2” guns authorized but only two 3”. Judging by the 2 links Taurus at least submitted tasteful selections.

https://www.taurususa.com/?view=article&id=480&catid=61

https://www.taurususa.com/?view=article&id=483&catid=61

If I come across a 3” I may jump on it.

Side note: I have a Colt Detective. I have found that the Colt and the Taurus 856 use the same speed loaders and are of similar weight. I may have to get a Taurus to find out. :thumbup:
I like the way the Colt feels in my hand. Maybe the Taurus might be similar in feel and handling.
 
A 3" heavy barrel, big front sight and Hogue grips are my idea of a just about perfect CCW revolver. Love to handle one in person.

Larry
 
Well , they are available.

Another note : I complained about the coarse texture of the stainless being a dirt magnet , but ss is still the way to go - the slightly cheaper matte black finish has a reputation for poor durability.
 
I tried my new 2" 856 CH (concealed hammer) yesterday, and was impressed with how well it shot. I don't think my trigger pull was near 13#, but I don't have a gauge to measure it. I did look around inside and noticed the trigger return spring had white paint on it. Maybe the DAO have a lighter return spring from the factory?

I was not impressed with the stock grips, however, and found them uncomfortable to shoot with. I'm eyeing the VZ grips on the Taurus USA website, as they are a good $15 cheaper than through VZ. Any suggestions on a comfortable grip for these?
 
I tried my new 2" 856 CH (concealed hammer) yesterday, and was impressed with how well it shot. I don't think my trigger pull was near 13#, but I don't have a gauge to measure it. I did look around inside and noticed the trigger return spring had white paint on it. Maybe the DAO have a lighter return spring from the factory?

I was not impressed with the stock grips, however, and found them uncomfortable to shoot with. I'm eyeing the VZ grips on the Taurus USA website, as they are a good $15 cheaper than through VZ. Any suggestions on a comfortable grip for these?


I have one with the spur hammer. I dont like it for pocket carry as the spur catches on something
Thinking about grinding it down. I should see if Taurus will sell me one
 
I don't think my trigger pull was near 13#, but I don't have a gauge to measure it.

From what I hear about Taurus there is a lot of variation from one to the next. Rossi was always like that ; my first handgun was a Rossi and it was very nice in every way including reliability. My next 2 were duds - mechanical issues.
About 2-3 years ago I had a Taurus 85. I'd say the da trigger was around 11-12# , a bit stacky and not real smooth. The 856 that is the subject of this thread was very smooth right out of the box - but heavy with a capital H. No stacking.
Obviously my sampling is limited , but that's what I have experienced.

Basically , a stock Taurus revolver is a good value , given the pricing. Improving the trigger is pretty easy , although there are many consumers who do not have the interest or the wherewithall to do that kind of work.
 
Just a few years ago, any mention of a Taurus product was met with vitriol and admonishment. Their reputation seems to be improving.

I will say they're doing a good job of coming out with products that fit the formulas of what people want to buy.
 
Well , there is that stigma.
I still would not call myself a "Taurus guy" .

I know , irrational , but ...
 
Funny how most military and L.E. fight wars and crime respectively with duty grade heavy no frills triggers, but the conceal carry crowd in this country sometimes acts like if a trigger isn't skating on ice and extremely light, they can't shoot or don't want the gun. The shorter and lighter the trigger pull and/or reset on a carry and self defense gun, the happier people are. Many even go as far to make their guns less reliable and more prone to negligent discharges by changing springs and even lightening the trigger to as light as 3.5-4lb on a carry gun.

Some people buy Taurus pistols expecting a target grade trigger or extra refinements that have nothing to do with how the gun functions or stopping a threat. Their handguns are meant to be an affordable civilian self defense firearms, and not for gaming, target shooting, putting rounds through the same hole on paper, family heirlooms, BBQ guns, etc. If you go in with the expectation of having practical combat/self-defense accuracy out an utilitarian handgun, I think most would be happy with the performance especially at that price point. I might not impress anyone at the range or win any shooting competitions with a Taurus; however, I'm confident that I can put rounds into a perp at self defense distances without an issue.
 
Last edited:
I've owned around ten Taurus revolvers... maybe 12.

Only one was a dud (lemon from Day One).

The rest went bang every time.

Some had stiff triggers, some mediocre, some quite good.

In general the better triggers seemed to be from the late 80's until the very early 90's.

Less Taurus hate these days because it's more difficult to find a decent deal on any handgun at all?

I bought a 2" blued steel Model 85 NiB in 1990 or so that sure had a nice trigger. I wish it hadn't been stolen.

This is my favorite lately. It's from the early 80's and has an internal trigger block instead of a transfer bar.

The trigger is very nice.

 
Everything Styx said is valid , and so is this:

In the case of selecting a handgun for a middle age woman who has minimal shooting experience and does not do manual labor (thinking in terms of hand strength) , trigger pull weight has to be taken into consideration.
It is highly unlikely that the particular person in question was going to become comfortable or proficient when working with a 12 -13 pound trigger.
The military and LEO personnel you refer to are young and physically fit. They train in fitness and in firearms as part of their jobs.

As to:
Many even go as far to make their guns less reliable and more prone to negligent discharges
I do not think that a full length da trigger stroke at 8.5# represents a heightened or unreasonable risk of a.d.
Regarding reliable ignition , I am taking great care to confirm that primer strikes are consistent and sufficient. So far there is no evidence to the contrary. And if that means that I have to spend a lot of time at the range to eliminate any lingering doubt , well , I am willing to accept that burden.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top